69°
forecast

With road plan, McDonnell gears up race

Posted to: Elections News Politics Traffic - Transportation Virginia

RICHMOND

In releasing a far-reaching transportation plan Tuesday, Bob McDonnell has taken a step toward defining the battle lines on the topic as the race for governor heads to the fall.

The package envisions adding tolls on two highways that connect North Carolina to Virginia, raising interstate speed limits to 70 mph, and fast-tracking projects such as expanding U.S. 460, widening Interstate 64, and creating a third bridge-tunnel linking South Hampton Roads and the Peninsula by leveraging private builders to do the work.

Accomplishing all that won't be easy, however.

In some cases, McDonnell would need a cooperative legislature and approval from federal agencies.

His plan borrows from failed legislative proposals of the past - it suggests raising money for roads by privatizing state Alcoholic Beverage Control stores and taking future tax revenues from the ports.

Other anticipated transportation funds hinge on federal action. McDonnell wants permission to spend stimulus money programmed for other uses on roads, and he is counting on royalties from offshore energy drilling that hasn't yet been authorized.

The Republican says he is using "creativity and innovation to fund the key priority" of transportation by relying on new and surplus revenues, not existing money earmarked for other core services.

His Democratic detractors insist the plan is more shell game than solution.

"We're not going to rob Peter to pay Paul by taking money away from the schoolchildren of Virginia, which is what Bob McDonnell's plan would do," said Jared Leopold, a spokesman for the Democratic gubernatorial candidate, state Sen. Creigh Deeds.

McDonnell wants to provide Hampton Roads officials with a portion of future revenue growth at the port, capping it at $300 million annually. By one estimate, the port generates $1.2 billion annually in state and local tax revenues, some of which go into the state general fund to support government services.

Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw, D-Fairfax County, said McDonnell's plan to pay for roads without raising new money is unrealistic.

"He's saying, 'I don't have to raise taxes. I can take it from public schools, higher education, health and human resources and the State Police,' " Saslaw said. "What Bob is hoping is he can find a highway contractor who will pour roads for free, but it ain't going to happen."

Monday, Deeds released an economic proposal that detailed his conceptual transportation plan. Among other ideas, the proposal advocates investments in rail and other multi-modal transit, and port enhancements. But aside from pledging to tackle transportation in his first year as governor, Deeds has been reluctant to wed himself to a specific funding approach, preferring to first build a consensus.

McDonnell called that "a non-plan."

A spokesman for the Republican said Deeds is intentionally being vague so he can "get in office and then raise taxes."

"It's a wish list of ideas with not a dime of money to actually fund a transportation plan," McDonnell added. "That's not how we're going to solve our transportation issues in Virginia."

Saslaw continues to believe a gas-tax increase is an ideal fix to the road funding problem. Legislation he introduced in 2008 to that effect passed the Senate - Deeds supported the plan - but died in the House of Delegates.

McDonnell rolled out his plan in Northern Virginia on Tuesday morning, then discussed it with reporters on a conference call shortly after noon.

He criticized the state for failing to issue roughly $3 billion in bonds approved by the legislature in 2007 as part of a road funding deal and said he would support $1 billion more in debt to fund projects in congested areas.

The 2007 package received the blessing of then-Attorney General McDonnell and Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, who amended it, but was ultimately dismantled by a state Supreme Court decision that ruled some of its components unconstitutional.

Because of the economic downturn, the state pushed back the scheduled sale of the bonds until this year to build up the money needed to pay back loans.

McDonnell also favors boosting the speed limit on more stretches of Virginia interstates to 70 mph, noting that 32 other states have similar highway standards.

Since the federal interstate speed limit was abolished in the mid-1990s, altering interstate speeds is largely a state decision. Changes in highway speeds require approval from the General Assembly, which typically relies on the opinions of traffic experts to determine whether the increase is safe.

Martha Meade, a AAA Mid-Atlantic spokeswoman, said the idea "is worth consideration."

Getting clearance to toll Interstates 85 and 95 could prove to be a more difficult task.

Federal government permission is needed before tolls can be enacted, and a condition of approval is often that work is being done to improve the road.

McDonnell wants to pump that toll revenue into improvements along I-95 and U.S. 460.

His plan also calls for an independent audit of the Virginia Department of Transportation to find waste and improve agency efficiency.

In the state's two most populous regions, McDonnell would allow Northern Virginia to keep a slice of local sales taxes to pay for roads, and in Hampton Roads he wants to push the U.S. 460, I-64 and third-crossing projects as priorities.

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

McDonnell's Transportation Plans

My husband tells me that it's against the Constitution to place tolls on interstate roads. Maybe that's because the Constitution claims the right for the U. S. Congress rather than the states to regulate interstate traffic.
Surely McDonnell must also have some idea that the money coming from the ABC stores is already being used by the state. Another thing must be considered. The state currently has a legal monopoly in Virginia. Would he have the right to sell a legal monopoly on liquor sales to any private vendors? He could dismantle the present system and throw liquor sale prices to the open market. But this could lower the price of liquor and cut the state out of a valuable and protected source of revenue.
I'm sure that he must also know that the Navy, the Department of Defense and NASA as well as environmentalists are down on the idea of offshore drilling. Only a short time ago the Pilot reported that Virginia Beach was having problems with the Navy over the number of buildable floors in hotels at the waterfront. Surely, somebody must have told McDonnell about it.
Increasing the speed limit on the interstates sounds nice. But it would run cars in a less environmentally eff

For what it's worth...

there are already toll on part of the Interstate system. In WV, I-64 has parts ot if that are toll access.

I have a plan

Raise the tax on ALL alcohol regardless of where it's being sold.

Why?

Why raise the tax? Is it to raise revenues, or to dissuade some from consuming alcohol (not a bad ending in and of itself, but does it contribute to the immediate problem of funding state priorities?). Eliminating the brick and mortar establishments that the state runs now, along with all that overhead associated with them, would generate more revenues without having to do anything! The stroes that presently sell beer/wine are certainly capable of handling booze sales, and all the requirements that go with that. The state and local ABC people will still be able to enforce and ainvestigate any abuses.

surprisingly I agree with McD

Surprisingly I agree with McD, but if either he or Deeds would be in favor of gay rights, then it was be a race.

Pigs can't fly

I support investment in transportation infrastructure; in fact, I happen to think it is the most important thing government can do to ensure prosperity in the future. What I and other business people do not support is the failure over the last decade to raise taxes and fees to invest the funds necessary to maintain and sustain a 21st century transportation system. McDonnell was part of blocking that when he was a member of the House of Delegates, and he was part of it as attorney general and high ranking member of the republican party in Virginia. He has consistently given in to right wing, anti tax component of the party to the detriment of the Commonwealth, and he has done so again with this Plan. I fervently believe that he knows this Plan has absolutely no chance of being implemented, but he believes it gives him cover as he proposes no new revenue sources so he gets the check off from the anti tax zealots. But seriously, does anyone believe that robbing Peter to pay Paul is the best Virginia can do? Come on, pigs can't fly.

Right wing Anti tax ?

You must have been one of the guys pushing for Regional Taxes. You Democrats never met a tax you didn't like. To you everyone else looks like a right wing anti tax zealot. You can call me right wing if you want to. That doesn't insult me. Just don't call me a Red State.

of course

Of Course Mike Barrett supports regional taxes. Think SPSA and how wonderfully managed that organization is. Mike Barrett is the blogging face of SPSA. What else do you call SPSA other than a regional tax and spend organization. I wouldn't trust his fiscal sense any more than I would my 4 year old daughter.... Come to think of it, I trust her fiscal sense much better. She understands when daddy doesn't have the funds to buy the new toy, Mr. Barrett apparently doesn't. Look at your city budget for refuse fees to see that.

Check the Facts first

Highly intelligent my you know what. Did you know that drilling for oil off the coast of Virginia is not only costly to consumers, taxpayers, and our environment, but it would pose a serious challenge to the military's ability to continue working and training in the Hampton Roads area? The United States Navy, the Department of Defense, and NASA all oppose drilling off the Commonwealth's coast, and most citizens strongly agree with those positions. This is just typical of McDonnell's supposed Plan, it is a laundry list of action items with little basis in possible action. For example, he wants to take a portion of the sales tax and dedicate it to transportation, but of course, those funds now support education and public safety. Does he really expect us to believe that we can spend the same tax dollar twice?

Do 'wind farms'...

off the coast pose such hazards as well? The Navy and most everyone else sure seems to do a good job avoiding the oil rigs off the coasts of Texas and Louisiana, not to mention off the coast of Great Britain, among other places.

Just a thought..

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Elections rss feed    News rss feed    Traffic - Transportation rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners