Missionary's killer seeks to overturn verdict

Posted to: Chesapeake Crime News

CHESAPEAKE

Convicted murderer James Boughton Jr. is seeking a new trial, alleging juror misconduct during his three-week trial in the shooting death of a Mormon missionary.

Defense attorney Andrew Sacks told Chesapeake Circuit Judge Randy Smith on Friday that a woman known as juror No. 26 complained to other jurors about defense tactics and withheld information about a bitter divorce.

Smith said he would allow attorneys to gather more evidence and rule later on whether the juror's testimony tainted the trial. He denied other motions to throw out the verdict and grant Boughton a new trial.

A Chesapeake jury convicted Boughton, 22, in December of killing Morgan W. Young with a gunshot to the head and wounding another missionary, Joshua Heidbrink, in January 2006.

Juror No. 26, a divorced woman with children, testified Friday she had been slapped by her former husband and that he threatened to kill her prior to their separation.

She went to Chesapeake Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court after the verbal threat, spoke to investigators and took her children to a shelter, she said.

When asked before the trial whether she had ever been a crime victim, the woman did not mention details of the divorce. "I didn't think of it as a crime. I thought of it as a marital dispute," she said.

Sacks said he would have excluded the juror had he known her background. He also argued that the juror's complaints about defense questioning revealed a bias that affected other jurors.

"That creates a cloud over this case," he said.

Prosecutor D.J. Hansen said the juror unintentionally left out details about her divorce because she didn't believe she had been a victim of a crime. "It was an honest omission," Hansen said. "There was nothing malicious about this."

Smith gave the lawyers three weeks to review the woman's divorce records and file new motions. He said he would issue a written ruling.

A jury recommended a 38-year sentence for Boughton. The sentencing, which had been set for Aug. 3, will be rescheduled.

Louis Hansen, (757) 222-5221, louis.hansen@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

I have an idea...

Why don't we all call this creepy defense attorney Andrew Sacks and let him know just what a "sack" we think he is?

Retrial?

If we're lucky, maybe he'll get more time for the crime!

This is a Hate crime plain and simple

This man attacked two white missionaries in his neighborhood with a gun knowing full well that these two had no weapons and dressed the way they were were not cops.
This thug executed one young man but the second one got away. All along the Pilot has told us that these two stumbled onto something they shouldn't have seen. How do you know this?
Why don't you print a story about the rehabilitation time and pain the victim is going through and how he had to pay his medical bills?

How did this brutal cold blooded killer only wind up with 38 years?? Who was the judge who presided over that case? Another example of a broken system and a cold blooded killer with a short sentence that does not decrease crime.
What circumstances in this case removed any consideration of capital punishment for this evil crime?

Fry em...

This defendant needs to get the electric chair.

The Court Needs To Do What Is Right!

How does a defense lawyer sleep at night?

how does a defense attorney sleep at night?

On a mattress stuffed with blood stained money.

We are all entitled to a

We are all entitled to a competent defense. I just don't get challenging a verdict based on something other than being innocent. "I am guilty....but..."

"...withheld information about a bitter divorce...." ???

This was a murder trial where a totally innocent missionary was gunned down. This is the desperation of the defense to free a convicted murderer--they never want anybody to go to prison, do they??? Note to future jurists: don't play along with the games of those involved in the jury system, you have rights as a jurist, too. More rights than you might think.

how wonderful!

And the sad thing is, he'll probably get it and then he'll probably released back into society to kill someone else. These Mormon Missionaries are least threatening and most passive people I have ever seen and this thug kills and maims them, then whines about every little thing. TOUGH IT UP BIG TOUGH KILLER! You are right where you belong. Hopefully your life will be living you know what before someone arranges a meeting for you and your maker.

Bizarre.

Anyone else find it bizarre for a conviction to be fought for a reason other than innocence?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Crime rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features