NORFOLK
Two years ago, a powerful Virginia lawmaker was instrumental in getting state funding for a teacher training center at Old Dominion University.
The day the money began flowing, the center put him on its payroll.
Del. Phillip Hamilton and the man who hired him at ODU say he was hired because of his credentials as an educator, not because of his political connections.
A government ethics expert and Hamilton's re-election opponent call it a conflict of interests.
Hamilton, a Newport News Republican, is a retired teacher and school administrator who works part time as coordinator of innovation and development for the Newport News school system.
During the 2007 General Assembly session, Hamilton sponsored an amendment to the state budget that provided startup funding for the Center for Teacher Quality and Educational Leadership at ODU.
Since then, the center has received $500,000 a year in state money. The center, in turn, has been paying Hamilton $40,000 a year as an independent contractor.
A legislator for 20 years, Hamilton is a senior member of the budget-writing House Appropriations Committee. Each year he sits on the House-Senate budget conference committee, a select group of lawmakers who hamme r out the final details of the state budget.
Virginia's conflict-of-interest law says a legislator cannot "accept any business or professional opportunity when he knows that there is a reasonable likelihood that the opportunity is being afforded him to influence him in the performance of his official duties."
In an interview, Hamilton said there is no conflict in this case, because he was not yet on the ODU payroll when he introduced the initial budget amendment for the center and he has done nothing to advance the center's continued funding since he was hired.
"It would be wholeheartedly inappropriate for me to do that," he said.
There was no discussion with ODU officials of possible employment with the center before his introduction of the budget amendment, he said.
Hamilton said he has not recused himself from any votes on the basis of his employment by ODU because there have been no separate votes pertaining to the center. He has voted for the overall budget bill, which includes funding for the center.
According to his contract, Hamilton serves as coordinator for the center. His stated duties include recruiting school districts to participate in center activities, marketing the center to state and federal officials and maintaining records.
The center is based in a small office in ODU's Peninsula Higher Education Center in Hampton. It shares space with the Urban Learning and Leadership Center, another ODU-affiliated entity that provides some training services for the teacher-quality center.
Hamilton said he has worked closely with the urban learning center. However, Harvey Perkins, that center's chief executive officer, said he was unaware that Hamilton had any role in the teacher-quality center.
Hamilton was hired by Dave Blackburn, director of the Program for Research and Evaluation in Public Schools in ODU's Darden College of Education.
Blackburn said ODU has been working with the Newport News school system for several years and Hamilton's hiring grew out of that partnership.
"It was just a natural fit," he said.
Blackburn and Hamilton had worked together in the Newport News school system before Blackburn came to ODU.
Blackburn said the ODU center is working with eight other school systems, including Norfolk, Virginia Beach and Hampton, and has received $19 million in competitive grants.
Hamilton helped win those grants, Blackburn said, adding, "He's more than leveraged the money that we're paying him."
Hamilton's affiliation with the ODU center raises several red flags, said Judy Nadler, a senior fellow in government ethics at Santa Clara University in California.
One problem, Nadler said, is that he is serving two masters - the center and the state legislature, its funding source.
Of particular concern, she added, is that one of his duties is promoting the center to government officials.
"When he is going to one of these legislative bodies and he says, 'How do you do? I'm here as the coordinator of this center,' they actually know him as a member of the state legislature," said Nadler, a former mayor of the city of Santa Clara. "If it were John Jones who was the coordinator of the center and he went knocking on doors, would he get the same response? Obviously not.
"If you say, 'No, thank you, we don't have any money,' or 'No, thank you, we send our students to a different institute,' there's certainly the possibility that people would feel that there may be some retribution.
"If they don't consider this a conflict, I guess my question would be, what is a conflict?" Nadler said. "Where is your threshold?"
Hamilton faces opposition for re-election this fall from Newport News attorney Robin Abbott, a Democrat.
"In my judgment, a member of the Appropriations Committee drawing salary from funding he initiated using taxpayer dollars denotes a clear impropriety and an obvious conflict of interests," Abbott said in a statement. "This is another example that the people of the 93rd District deserve a new delegate focused on the needs of the people."
Pilot writer Julian Walker contributed to this report.
Bill Sizemore, (757) 446-2276, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com






Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo



Oh, God, more of the "Ditto head" rheortic
You can always tell who are the "Ditto Heads". You know, the listeners of Rush Limbaugh, Hannity,etc political hacks.The sheep will come out of the barn all repeating the same rhetoric word by word. Just look at the previous post. Dodd is the word of the week, as their sheep herder has been singing all week. Amazing how they will turn every thing that happens back to the same garbage. Instead of focusing on the issue, the crook in the story, they start the usual Bahh Bahh! All in tune together. The guy is this article is a crook and a cheat. It has nothing to do with any party. But to them anything gives them the opening to start bashing the Democrat party, just like the sheep they are. For 8 years we listened to the Bahh Bahh of this crowd as Bush lead our country into a bogus war, and into a economic ditch.May God help us!
I know this is a....
matter for local voters, but seeing how I've seen the names of the esteemed Senators Dodd and Conrad invoked, it's interesting that Congress has decided that there will be no investigations into their sweetheart deals, per today's Pilot. Business as usual, I reckon. I'm sure there will be no editorial outrage expressed by that extension of the DNC known as the Pilot's Editorial Board. How's that change coming that you all voted for? How's that new level of transparency doing? Get back with me on that, 'ya hear?
The REAL conflict of interest
Yes, let's talk about a "conflict of interest." We have a Democratic Governor working part-time for the voters who elected him and part-time on partisan politics. Virginia taxpayers are paying 100% of his salary. Where is the Pilot's and Robin Abbott's disgust, questioning and inuendos here?
disgust?
Where was the disgust from the republicans when we had republican Governor Gilmore (RNC chairman) working part-time for the voters who elected him and part-time on partisan politics?
"leveraged"
A neat investment term indicating control of big money with small money. In this case $40k brought in $500k. A pretty good investment after all!
Hey Pilot watchdogs!
How about something on the ducking & dodging of responsibilities by the Democrat Congressional "leadership" regarding the investigation of sweetheart mortgage deals given to Democrat Senators Dodd & Conrad (and possibly even a Republican or 2 - you can't resist that now, can ya?)
If ya need to refresh your memories on how to write an objective piece, it's on breitbart.com.
How much does it take?
Given the comments defending Hamilton in this latest situation, I wonder how much it takes for some of the posters to conclude that Hamilton and the members of the republican caucus from Hampton Roads have not served our interest? How many more bridges need to close? How many more rest stops need to be shuttered? How many more pot holes do we need to endure before you acknowledge that the republican caucus hs brought us only decay and deterioration? I don't care whether he is a republican or a democrat; the point is, he is in the majority in the House, and has been for a decade, and they have continued to block adequate funding for transportation for all that time. So what is the cost of failing to do ones job?
What is the cost of another frivolous lawyer?
So what will having yet another lawyer in the legislature change? More legislation to make it easier to sue. This is NOT what the citizens of the 93rd district need!
Go Phil! He has lived here is whole life, he cares about this community and has represented us well!
Take your pot holes and shove em.
You speak of the roads as if they're in bad condition. Perhaps you are unaware of the fact that Virginia is consistently ranked as having the best roads in the nation. And, your DEMOCRATIC governor made the decision to close the rest stops. Delegates did not vote on this decision. CHECK YOUR FACTS MIKE!
This cas about Hamilton has
This cas about Hamilton has nothing to do with transportation.
Resign
Hamilton is a good and decent person. Unfortunately, this makes him look otherwise. Even if he happened to be the best man for the job, he shouldn't have taken it.
Well, we know based on typical Pilot...
reporting that if this guy was a Dem, we'd never see a peep uttered about his party affiliation. But, regardless, this does seem fishy based on what has been reported, but there again, based on that typical Pilot reporting, we may have to ask what has NOT been reported? But, this guy may have a future within the Obama admin if he keeps this up!
Give me a break
What makes you think that the Pilot would not disclose the party affiliation if it were a democrat? Stop being ridiculous.
From experience, AM...
and I have the e-mails to prove it, where I submitted letters to the Pilot's Editors asking them why I had to do the research to determine the party affiliation of a politician mentioned in a scandal who turned out to be a Dem! They do that out of routine.
And your beloved Pilot, due to their questionable journalistic credentials (at least among that extension of the DNC known as the Editorial Board) couldn't (or wouldn't) get the party affiliation of New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg correct in an editorial a few months back that tried to taint the GOP, to name but one example. They seemed to have somehow missed that Bloomberg hadn't been a Republican for almost 2 years, and that their OWN paper gave the story significant prominence.
OK? Any other inane questions? Hmmm?
Inane?
And you bring up one article about Bloomberg? Reread your definition. And by the way, the editorial board is not the news crew, which makes your argument, how should we say? Inane? We are talking about a news story and not an editorial by the way. And speaking of editorials, you must have missed my comments when I take my 'beloved VA pilot' to task for failing to properly identify LTE writers.
I bring up ONE article..
because of space and time limitations here, AM. The Pilot claims that their Editorial Board is composed of (ahem) 'journalists'. If those (ahem) 'journalists' can't even research a basic fact that was ballyhooed IN THEIR OWN PAPER, why would anyone expect any modicum of veracity in their editorials (which some of us do NOT expect, by the way, based on their record!)? The EB routinely comments on the NEWS stories you mention, AM, or didn't anyone ever communicate that to you? And it's in the Pilot's news reporting where routine info like a politician's party affiliation is routinely omitted, IF that politician is from the party they choose to promote, and thus protect, the Dems! That's a fact.
You must be new.
The Pilot doesn't leave party affiliation off the stories of
criminality & conflicts of interest on the Left - only because they usually just don't run the story in the first place (e.g. Sen. Dodd & Sen. Conrad's sweetheart mortgages that they were caught lying about; the 44 crooked NJ politicians & rabbis nabbed last week for financial scams, money laundering & even selling human body parts - all but one of the pols were Democrats. Need more?)
Newport News Lawmaker!
Now let's get this straight, if this would have been a liberal Democrat everything would have been Hush, hush on the Qt. Now this guy is a Republican so this just is not right. Now you tell me what's not right about this thing. There is some things blatant obvious you don't have to be blind and dumb to see it. This falls in that catagory.
This has nothing to do with
This has nothing to do with rather he's Republican or Democrat. It has to do with good ethics. Shouldn't both parties fall into that catergory?
Absolutely...
both parties should fall into that! And the media should be the ones enforcing that, going after ALL who exhibit questionable ethics, or worse. There in lies the rub, our media (especially the Pilot), by championing one side only, does not provide the objective insight to hold all accountable. With limited resources, it's not hard to picture how those resources will be alloted when it comes to investigating political wrongdoing. The Pilot has been failing that standard for years now, and we all pay for that!