76°
forecast

Stolle drafts bill to help freed Norfolk man get restitution

Posted to: News Norfolk

NORFOLK

State Sen. Kenneth Stolle said Thursday that he will try to get state restitution more quickly for a Norfolk man who was wrongfully imprisoned for nearly 22 years on charges of rape.

He may face problems getting it considered.

Arthur Whitfield, 54, has been out of prison for almost five years. He has shuttled between jobs, his car has been impounded, and the water has been cut off at his Lamberts Point apartment. His father drives him to work each morning, although lately Whitfield's health problems have meant days off for lab tests, he said earlier this week.

Stolle, R-Virginia Beach, drafted a bill Thursday that he hopes will go before the General Assembly during a special session that begins Aug. 19. It calls for Whitfield to receive $445,703 in compensation for the 22 years he spent behind bars.

Stolle said getting the money to Whitfield now, instead of waiting for the regular session in January - as legislators had previously planned - could help the struggling man.

"He's got health issues, he's kind of slipped through the cracks," Stolle said. "Instead of holding it in limbo another year, we should try to introduce it."

But getting it before legislators for a vote will be its own challenge, Stolle conceded.

Gov. Timothy M. Kaine earlier this week called the special session only so legislators can amend state law dealing with how government forensic scientists are called to testify in criminal trials. The state needs to respond to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling that places the burden on prosecutors to have crime analysts testify in court about evidence, rather than simply submit a written report.

When Kaine announced the session, he said legislative leaders had agreed to keep its scope limited.

There is a possibility that a claims bill could be filed at the start of the special session, said House Majority Leader Morgan Griffith, R-Salem, but it's unlikely that it will be heard unless legislators agree to include it in a procedural resolution they must adopt.

Griffith cautioned that making an exception for one bill could open the floodgates for other legislation and distract lawmakers from the forensic evidence issue.

Fairfax County Democratic Sen. Richard Saslaw, the Senate Majority Leader, said he plans to stick to the understanding reached with Kaine. Saslaw said he sympathizes with Whitfield's plight and isn't opposed to compensating him when legislators return to Richmond early next year.

Stolle said he hopes public pressure on the legislators will change their minds.

Whitfield's attorney, Michael Fasanaro, said he worries that the amount Whitfield would receive - which equals about $20,000 for every year he spent incarcerated - isn't enough.

"I would say that's low," Fasanaro said.

The amount was calculated according to a state formula set in 2004. Whitfield would receive roughly $89,000 initially and the rest over 25 years. He would also be eligible for $10,000 in tuition assistance at any Virginia community college.

Fasanaro said Whitfield needs the cash as soon as possible: "The guy's desperate for the money."

Oddly, it has been Whitfield's very freedom that has stood in the way of his receiving state aid quicker. When DNA test results in 2004 found that he was not the man who had committed two 1981 rapes in Norfolk, he was released on parole almost immediately.

That circumvented the normal release procedure for wrongfully incarcerated people, and along with a protest from a rape victim, delayed a governor's pardon until April of this year.

Fasanaro immediately applied for transition money often paid to wrongfully incarcerated individuals, but the state Supreme Court ruled that Whitfield was not eligible.

Fasanaro said Thursday that he has been working with Del. Bob Tata, R-Virginia Beach, to prepare a claims bill for Whitfield for the General Assembly's regular session. But he welcomed a chance to introduce Whitfield's claim earlier, in August. Tata did not return a call to his office Thursday.

Fasanaro said people in the community have sent in roughly $2,500 to help Whitfield.

Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Whitfield is just the latest

22 years. No amount of money can compensate a man for 22 years. This case shows just how broken VA’s court system is. For an innocent man to be found guilty “beyond a reasonable doubt,” the judge was either biased or incompetent. At the end of the day, he’s responsible for whatever happened in that courtroom.

There are many other innocent people in jail right now, and that shows that VA has many bad judges. In most cases, the only qualification needed to become a VA judge is giving a campaign contribution to a state senator. They have no oversight and no accountability, and the Pilot won’t even print their names when they ruin peoples’ lives.

Not all judges are bad, but there are many terrible ones all over VA (vacriminaljustice.webs.com). Governor Kaine and our legislators refuse to fix that problem. It’s time to hold them all accountable. Until that’s fixed, they will keep on destroying innocent lives. And the taxpayers will continue to have to pay for it.

Whitfield's attorney,

Whitfield's attorney, Michael Fasanaro, said he worries that the amount Whitfield would receive - which equals about $20,000 for every year he spent incarcerated - isn't enough.

Pro Bono work Mr. Fasanaro or it isn't enough because your 'cut' will be smaller?

No money for attorney

As I understand Mr. Fasanaro will get nothing from the claims bill. While he may not recognize this, the settlement should should and will go completely to Mr. Whitfield.

There is an interesting...

juxtaposition of issues as far as today's Pilot's letters-to-the-Editors. The first letter is about this case, where the writer states that this man should receive compensation for being wrongly incarcerated, and that it's just wrong for the govt to take this long in trying to right this. Below it are several letters pro and con about the govt health care proposals. Not wanting to get off track here, but I found it interesting that anyone weighing in on the merits of the govt taking over the health care industry just may want to take a good, hard look at what this man is going thru! Might his case be an indication of what govt run health care could entail, for some anyway, in hoping the act in a timely manner on health decisions?

That said, there's no excuse to drag this out with this man. If the state screwed up, the state needs to step up and do the right thing!

Contact your reps

Please contact your General Assembly representatives NOW and ask that they include this legislation in the special session. To make Mr. Whitfield wait any longer is an absolute injustice.

Tax free!

Taxing him 38% which is the rate on large payouts would be wrong.

Kaine

Since you are the main man in this Micky Mouse state, why don't you step up to the plate...do something about this and pay the man. To me, that is even not enough money for 22 years of life.

her protest delayed his pardon?

Too bad the PILOT can't post the name of the rape victim who is so full of bitterness toward this man that she would protest his release.
So, often, emotion clouds reason. She needs to leave this innocent man alone. He has been through enough. What part did she play in getting him wrongfully accused? If the transcript of her testimony back in the early 80's says what it probably does, she could be civilly liable. To help send a wrongfully accused black man away for 22 years is egregious. She should back off.

If there is no DNA how can you prove innocence?

Unfortunately this issue is being debated only in the Va. Pilot, which continues to push its side and will not allow the other side to be heard. The rape victim who is opposed to Whitfield’s pardon says that no DNA evidence was collected in her case. How can DNA evidence acquit someone of a crime where there is no DNA evidence? It is easy for the Pilot to push this issue if they only report one side. They continue to refer to Whitfield as innocent until now his innocence has become uncontestable fact. They have even convinced a state senator, who will need black votes to win his next citywide election. I wish the Pilot would just give us all the facts of the case and stop avoiding the inconvenient truth. But I doubt that will happen

DNA Evidence

The police still had the physical evidence ("rape kits") from the two victims Mr. Whitfield was wrongly accused of raping. DNA tests were run on both rape kits in 2004. Neither matched Mr. Whitfield's DNA; both matched another person's DNA. Investigators don't "take" DNA evidence. DNA is extracted from the samples of hair, skin, bodily fluids, etc., obtained during the investigation. DNA evidence is 100% conclusive. Sadly for these victims, including Mr. Whitfield, eyewitness accounts and human memories are imperfect.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox