The Virginian-Pilot
©
NEWPORT NEWS
A lot can go wrong, constructing a vessel as sophisticated as a nuclear-powered submarine.
Something as simple as nuts and bolts wouldn't seem to be a problem.
But the Navy said Friday it is investigating mechanical problems involving bolts in the torpedo rooms of four Virginia-class submarines built at Northrop Grumman's shipyard.
It's the latest in a series of problems for the shipyard, which partners with General Dynamic Electric Boat in Connecticut to build fast-attack submarines. Each sub costs about $2 billion.
Alan Baribeau, a spokesman for the Navy's Sea Systems Command, said the Navy received word on Aug. 6 of "a mechanical quality issue" with the weapons-handling system tracks on the Missouri, which is being assembled in Connecticut.
Northrop Grumman builds all of the weapons-handling systems for the Virginia-class subs. Various sections built in Virginia and Connecticut are then assembled, alternately, at each shipyard.
The problem stems from the tracks that allow crews to move various weapons into place in the torpedo tubes. Weapons systems include missiles, torpedoes, mines and underwater vehicles.
Using the wrong bolts, bolt holes and fasteners, Baribeau said, could misalign the weapons cradles, preventing sailors from being able to move weapons within the torpedo room. Also, if the problem weren't corrected and the submarine experienced a "shock event" - such as an underwater explosion - its weapons-handling system could be compromised, Baribeau said, meaning the sub might not be able to de ploy any weapons.
He emphasized that the problem was caught because of an "overall attention to quality."
"The Navy and the shipbuilders are working to ensure safe ships are delivered. Delay in a ship's delivery is worth it to get a safe and quality ship for its expected 33-year life," Bar-ibeau said.
It's unclear whether the North Carolina, which was delivered to the fleet more than a year ago, had experienced any problems related to the bolts.
Both Navy and shipyard officials said the bolt problem doesn't indicate any systemic flaws at Northrop Grumman. Northrop Grumman has long built quality submarines, including the Cheyenne in 1997 and the Texas in 2006, Baribeau said.
Over the past decade, the Newport News shipyard lost personnel through retirements and attrition, and it didn't always have a continuous work flow.
"Without continuous flow of work, you lose people and efficiency," Baribeau said. "Both Electric Boat and Northrop Grumman Shipb uilding are continually working to improve their performance."
But others see a troubling record at the only shipyard in the nation that builds aircraft carriers, and one of just two that constructs submarines. Almost two years ago, the Navy blamed piping weld problems in the Virginia-class submarine program on "inadequate processes" at the Newport News facility. Then came reports that an employee had falsified inspection records of up to 10,000 welds on submarines and carriers.
Last month, the submarine Toledo - a Los Angeles-class fast-attack submarine - was preparing to deploy from Connecticut when a 21-inch crack was discovered in its topside hull. The Toledo was built in Newport News in the mid-1990s, and it returned to the yard in 2006 for a 27-month overhaul.
The Navy announced this week that the crack would be fixed by Electric Boat. It will take about two months and cost $717,000.
Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Naval Sea Systems Command is part of this and other problems
Their mission statement: "The mission of Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) is to develop, deliver and maintain ships and systems on time, on cost for the United States Navy." That's why they have program managers. That's why the NAVSEA spokesperson released the bad news in this article--just one more release in a series of bad news from NAVSEA. Please note the quote above "The Navy and the shipbuilders"... they didn't say just the "shipbuilders" -- they said the Navy and the shipbuilders. NAVSEA is charged with developing and delivering ships and systems on time and on cost--Congress needs to investigate why they appear to be unable to do that over and over again.
Serious Problems Continue
I used to work in the ASDS program, which was cancelled due to extemely high repair costs. It was initially built by this same company before they came into the submarine building business. Now we still have faulty welds, wrong materials being used. Grumman should have stayed out of the business after they botched what would have been one of the greatest assets to the SF community.
Place blame where it belongs. . .
"..NAVSEA still appears to be in desperate need of serious Congressional oversight."
NAVSEA isn't the problem. Grumman is once again doing substandard work. A few months back it was welding problems. Grumman needs to fire all QC managers and supervisors and some management in general. Until they do that, I'd not let them have and post manufacturing work at all. There are other places that do far better work. I know people at Grumman, and I'm told they care more about the time you get in than the workmanship.
Naval Sea Systems command strikes again...
...NAVSEA still appears to be in desperate need of serious Congressional oversight. When will Congress hold hearings on all that's wrong at NAVSEA???
Cost of Quality
We all know about the SubSafe program that was implemented after the loss of the Thresher. Today the program in my opinion is just a wispher of what it as developed to be. Getting the job done below cost and the bottom line seemingly takes precident today over the safety of the sailors who man these ships.
I vividly remember the Memorial Service at the Sub Base in Groton for the fathers of my classmates at Pleasant Valley Elementary School who were lost due to a material control error. I pray it never happens again.
Contradiction?
He emphasized that the problem was caught because of an "overall attention to quality."
How many are already in service with this problem? Perhaps he missed the words "lack Of" prior to attention!