The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
Have a Nice Day Cafe and Bar Norfolk will remain closed over the weekend as their owners wrangle with the city over the fate of the two Waterside nightclubs.
Circuit Judge Norman A. Thomas on Friday afternoon pushed back a hearing contesting the bars' ability to open and serve alcohol until next Tuesday morning.
Both establishments have been padlocked shut by their landlords, Waterside Associates LLC. The shutout occurred because the bars continued to serve alcohol after City Council on Tuesday revoked a zoning permit allowing them to do so.
The city filed a lawsuit Thursday asking the judge to prohibit the clubs from serving alcohol; early Friday afternoon, the bars counter-sued requesting that Thomas overturn the City Council's ruling and order Waterside Associates to unlock the doors and allow them to operate. Waterside Associates is a private company operated by the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority.
At a court hearing Friday afternoon, attorneys for NRHA and Waterside Associates failed to appear. Without the attorneys present, Thomas said he could not consider the bars' request to reopen immediately.
That made the city's need for a prohibition on alcohol sales moot, because the bars are padlocked shut and inoperable, said Virginia Beach attorney Kevin Martingayle, who represents both Bar Norfolk and Have a Nice Day Cafe.
City Attorney Bernard A. Pishko asked Thomas repeatedly to hear the city's motion today, saying the bars had "thumbed their nose at the law" by serving alcohol after the City Council revoked a use permit to do so.
Martingayle, meanwhile, has publicly lashed out at city officials, saying their tactics are heavy-handed and unnecessary.
In the lawsuit filed Friday, he argued that the city had no authority to enforce alcohol sales at the bars because both were open before Waterside came under a mid-1999 special exception zoning permit.
“These two restaurants are vested and grandfathered,” he said. “They were open before the first overall permit was ever granted.”
The council revoked the buildingwide permit Tuesday and issued individual licenses to each restaurant in the entertainment complex. Bar Norfolk and Have a Nice Day Cafe were the only two establishments in Waterside to be prohibited from serving alcohol.
Mayor Paul Fraim said Thursday that the public needs to understand why the city has taken forceful measures. City leaders want to remake Waterside’s image by turning it into a more family-friendly entertainment venue.
City officials have repeatedly said they’ve had problems at both bars, ranging from intoxicated patrons to Alcohol Beverage Control Board violations.
Police reported three arrests Wednesday night at Waterside – one on a charge of being drunk in public and two on charges of disorderly conduct. “Pretty par for the course for Waterside,” police spokesman Chris Amos said.
Martingayle said that if anyone is responsible for emotions getting out of control, it’s the city, which he said revoked the bars’ permits to serve alcohol with only hours of notice and padlocked the doors to Have a Nice Day Cafe without notice.
“My view is that the city has elevated this from a garden-variety zoning dispute into something of a holy war,” he said. “When the facts and the law are on your side, you don’t have to ambush like they have done.”

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
No Surprise
I think Paul Fraim has been taking lessons from the Beach city council. I won't be dining anywhere in downtown Norfolk again, I can think of better ways to spend my money.
vbn
How are those two bars anymore responsible for actions take by individuals outside their establishments then the government is for those same actions happening in their garages and buildings?
Hundreds of thousands of folks have had drinks in those establishments without causing any incidents for anyone. Hold the individuals responsible for their actions, not everyone else. If the city doesn't want fights or other incidents in their garages and government owend establishments then they should be providing better security or risked being sued for not properly handling their assets and creating an unsafe environment.
Collective punishment should be equally applicable for city entities as it is for private business.
Norfolk would have a lot
Norfolk would have a lot more money to spend if they would stop harassing people that they later are ordered to pay restitution. $65,000 for the hula-hoop lady!!!! Now she can buy a proper boom-box!!
Classic Norfolk nepatism at the expense of citizens once again
The doors will remain padlocked and city attorneys dragging their feet until the owners almost lose their shirts. Then, a relative of a city councilman offer a bargain basement fire sale price.
How do you think we got "restaurant row" that drove out all the independent owners? Establishments shuttered for buying doors from someone besides the councilman's door salesman relative, music on a jook box that could incite patrons to illegally dance, a condo developer neglects to install sound baffling above an existing restaurant so the business get shuttered.
Its the same scam by city council to keep their family members rolling in dough.
Pocket!
Sounds like the judge is in the city's pocket. He should have ruled that the bars can open at least until these attorneys' decide to show up. It's just an indication as to where his decision is going to lay. Local judges generally find for the local government because legislators in the general assembly hold their appointments in their hands. Just another example of dirty politics.
"At a court hearing Friday
"At a court hearing Friday afternoon, attorneys for NRHA and Waterside Associates failed to appear."
Typical City of Norfolk dirty tricks.
Who else would get away with that?
learn to read
The lawyers for NRHA and Waterside Associates were absent, not the City's lawyers. The City Attorney himself was present. NRHA is a completely separate political subdivision of the state and has its own (highly paid) legal counsel. They are not represented by the City Attorney's office, so spew your venom on them.
I bet...
if the judge said the establishments remained open until the city lawyers showed up they'd have been there.
Alcohol reports
I once heard of a traffic accident that was caused by a
man who never drank any thing stronger than tea. He lost
control of his auto, skidded into a man setting in his
yard, drinking beer, and killed him. In the cops report
it was stated "alcohol related"
Get The Big Picture Here Norfolk
This is not about couple of businesses being shot in the head. Their closed. Here's the real story.
"Waterside Associates is a private company operated by the Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority." The City of Norfolk owns Waterside.
Why do we have public-private ventures speculating with taxpayer dollars?
There is no "private" company. It's owned by ME; a homeowner, tax paying voter.
END the Waterside PPV. Sell all of it, or flatten it.
That will never happen.
Again, Norfolk, it's about MONEY.