70°
forecast

Campaign 2009: Begin with the roads

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

If this year's crop of statewide and legislative candidates is remarkable in any way, it is for their utter lack of ambition.

The 2009 campaign has drifted past Labor Day and is aimlessly bobbing along toward Election Day without well-articulated goals or a credible plan for solving Virginia's most pressing problem - the traffic congestion choking our urban and suburban communities.

Democrats and Republicans seem satisfied to mumble vague promises about restoring the economy and to posture over controversial bills pending before Congress. The next governor and General Assembly will have a peripheral role at best in those matters, but they serve as convenient and divisive distractions from the one responsibility that unquestionably falls to state leaders.

Do these candidates want to revive Virginia's economy? Then they should explain how they will resuscitate the state's highway construction budget, which has been gutted by $3.7 billion in cuts since the spring of 2008.

Do they want to make Virginia a safer place to raise a family? Improve maintenance of existing bridges and tunnels and provide a new escape route for residents of Hampton Roads fleeing a dangerous hurricane.

Do they want to create jobs? Build roads.

Transportation should be dominating the campaign debates this year, but on the few occasions that it has surfaced, the result has been unenlightening and thoroughly frustrating.

In the governor's race, Democrat Creigh Deeds drew shrieks of protest from GOP headquarters when he said he would sign a transportation package that included a tax increase, even though he added the caveat that the bill must have bipartisan support. Republican Bob McDonnell later said he would veto the bill under the same circumstances.

McDonnell has released a transportation plan of welcome specificity, which raises money through a combination of selling off state assets, diverting money from critical needs and responsibilities, and a heavy dose of overly hopeful financial projections.

Deeds' proposal is distinguished by its lack of specificity, either in what he proposes to build or how he proposes to pay for it.

That leaves voters with choices between unacceptable alternatives - between passivity and obfuscation from the Democratic ticket and obstructionism and fantasy from the Republican choice.

It's no wonder most voters don't even bother asking candidates for their positions on the issue anymore.

But residents of Hampton Roads can't give up.

Unlike Northern Virginia, this region still has the time and the means to save itself. No amount of asphalt can erase the decades of poor planning and population growth that are strangling D.C.'s suburbs.

In Hampton Roads, politics and absolutist ideology are the obstacles to success. They can be overcome, but it will take a leader with courage, a commitment to Virginia's future and a healthy dose of ambition.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

End the corruption to deal with transportation

The Pilot has been a large part of the problem, not the solution, to our region's transportation. The Pilot has been in bed with the local business lobby and was a member of the rejected 2002 YES campaign that seeks to use transportation as a way to stand up unaccountable regional government controlled by special interests. The wrong "package" of expensive highways was pushed by the Pilot - and it still being pushed by the Pilot! To "fix" transportation in our region and state we need to get rid of the influence of corprations in buying the politcal process. We need a local newspaper that reports the news instead of acting as a media PR arm of special interests that buy advertizing in the newspaper. We need to end the borrow and spend addiction of governent and learn to prioritize. Far too much speculative "economic development" is used as the criteria for deciding what roads will be built or improved. Mass transit is a "social justice" scam for the Left.

Good Point

I have to agree with your analysis. However, to play the devils advocate in this lets remember a couple of things about this issue. For one, a large part of the state doesn't really care if the Hampton Roads area has a good transportation system, it is not in their back yard. I believe that the majority of action on the issue will have to be more local. Second, I can understand why they are being a little vague at best about the funding of any road project. I have not decided on who I am going to vote for Governor yet but I see the same ole things being said at commercials. In the past, Deeds has attempted to face reality in that the money needed for expensive road projects will have to come from a significant increase in taxes in one way or another. He has proposed an increase in the gasoline tax. He is now being slammed for it. Is it any wonder that any candidate shys away from any tax increase. What the reality of the siuation is that many of our citizens want our government to provide Universal Health Care, Better Roads and many other things but think that someone else is going to foot the bill. In essence, they want something for noting.

Here's one for you Mike.

I saw and spoke to Former Governor Jim Gilmore this past Saturday trying to convince him to run for Governor of Virginia to again work to get rid of the other 30% of the car tax we are still stuck with.
I figured that would make your day.

Condemnation of the electorate

Regretfully, I have to agree with your analysis although I believe that Deeds will actually address the problem and McDonnell will not. But the uderlying issue is why candidates will not actually address the real issues, and I have concluded that they and their legions of pollsters and advisors believe that the electorate is getting dumber and dumber, and is simply not smart enough to truly understand the important issues, so we will get beautifully made videos of the candidate and his family, beautiful pictures showing folks in need, and statements from the candidates mouthing generalities. What does this say about us, about the condition of our republic, about our desire to know the facts and evaluate the effects of public policy? As you pointed out, we seem to prefer policy statements written on a bumper sticker; then we don't really need to think about it. Meanwhile, our roads and bridges crumble. Can't we see the truth right in front of us?

Great Advertisment for "Stimulus"

Man I should have noticed this one coming. -Want to do a good thing? Have a government spend money.- I could have written this piece and not believed myself at all doing it... just raise some common questions Virginians ask themselves and apply the same "let the government spend money on things (since we're in Virginia let's use Transporation)" mentality. Jeez, maybe the reason McDonnell is running away with this even in the face of a obscenely blown out of proportion thesis is because people don't want to see their much money spent by people other than themselves.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox