Hampton Roads, VA - 02/09/2010
Clear30°Clear
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Coast Guard seeks taller radio tower; view is issue

Posted to: Military North Carolina


BUXTON

The Coast Guard is proposing that a new radio tower - more than 100 feet taller than the existing tower - be built in the shadow of the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse as part of an upgrade of its search-and-rescue communications system.

Known as Rescue 21, the system - already in place in Hampton Roads, the Eastern Shore and seven locations in North Carolina - is the mariners' version of 911 and enables the Coast Guard to pinpoint the location and identity of a distressed mariner.

Historic preservationists argue that the 525-foot tower proposed for Buxton will be a greater blight on the view around the 208-foot-tall lighthouse, and they want it built elsewhere.

The Coast Guard contends, however, that the replacement tower - which will also have

a taller lightning rod - will be similar to the existing tower and won't be more visually obtrusive.

Photographic simulations with the draft environmental assessment don't support the Coast Guard's argument, said Renee Gledhill-Earley, environmental review coordinator for the State Historic Preservation Office.

"If you look out the top of the lighthouse, it's right in your face," she said, referring to the existing tower near Cape Point. "If you're standing on the ground, it's right in your face.

"The visual is adversely affecting the historic resource. The lighthouse should be the most prominent feature in the landscape."

Gledhill-Earley said the Coast Guard has not explained why the new tower could not be put at the former site of Group Cape Hatteras in Buxton, where it would not affect any historic properties.

In addition, she said, her office has no evidence that it reviewed the existing tower, leaving open the question whether it is in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act. The preservation office is charged with administering the law, which requires effects on designated historic properties to be mitigated, minimized or avoided.

Thomas A. Tansey at the Coast Guard Rescue 21 project office handling the Buxton project was unavailable for comment.

The proposed tower would be built about 50 feet southwest of the existing 425-foot tower, on 11 acres near Cape Point owned by the Coast Guard. According to the draft environmental assessment, the structure would be supported with 24 guy wires with bird flight diverters and be anchored in three places by concrete foundations within a 400-foot radius.

In comments to the Coast Guard, the National Park Service requested that the taller tower be unpainted in order to lessen the visual impact, said Doug Stover, a historian with Cape Hatteras National Seashore.

Stover said the existing orange-and-white tower is visible from the base of the lighthouse, and even more so from the balcony. If the proposed tower were left its steel-gray color, high-density white strobe lighting would be required for daytime.

Visual issues aside, the new tower will be a good thing for the Outer Banks, said Sandy Sanderson, director of Dare County Emergency Management.

"It will be a more substantial tower with more structural integrity that's more likely to sustain any weather impacts," he said.

The $1 billion nationwide Rescue 21 system was first installed in Atlantic City and the Eastern Shore in 2005. It is in place at 20 of the Coast Guard's 39 sectors and air stations, according to Richard V. Kanehl at the Coast Guard's Office of Strategic Planning & Communication.

Buxton and Cedar Island are the sites of the last new towers planned for North Carolina.

The technology improves the clarity and range of the signal as well as the information provided, said Lt. John Strasburg, chief of the command center at Coast Guard Sector North Carolina.

Strasburg cited a Father's Day rescue near Camp Lejeune where the new equipment prevented confusion about the location of a capsized vessel, resulting in everyone's being promptly saved.

"It's been a significant increase in capability," he said.

Dare County, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the Park Service, and the state Division of Marine Fisheries have antennas on the existing tower. It has not been decided what antennas will be on the replacement tower.

Andrea Probst, Rescue 21 consultant, said the Coast Guard hopes to release the final plan in the fall. The public comment period closed Aug. 28.

Catherine Kozak, (252) 441-1711, cate.kozak@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

USCG TOWER

OUR COUNTRY WILL CONTINUE TO PAY A GREAT PRICE IF THE PRICE BEAUTY BECOMES GREATER THAN SAVING LIVES. THE SAVING OF EVEN ONE LIFE FAR OUTWEIGHS BEAUTIFICATION. THE SAME HOLDS FOR THE BEACH PLAN THERE. FOR SO CALLED PROTECTION AND CLOSURES OF EXCESSIVE SPACE THE FOLKS LIVING ON THE OUTER BANKS SEEM TO TAKE THE BACK SEAT WITH THE JUDGES ANS POLITICIANS. BUILD THE TOWER GIVE THE PEOPLE BACK THEIR LAND.

USCG TOWER

OUR COUNTRY WILL CONTINUE TO PAY A GREAT PRICE IF THE PRICE BEAUTY BECOMES GREATER THAN SAVING LIVES. THE SAVING OF EVEN ONE LIFE FAR OUTWEIGHS BEAUTIFICATION. THE SAME HOLDS FOR THE BEACH PLAN THERE. FOR SO CALLED PROTECTION AND CLOSURES OF EXCESSIVE SPACE THE FOLKS LIVING ON THE OUTER BANKS SEEM TO TAKE THE BACK SEAT WITH THE JUDGES ANS POLITICIANS. BUILD THE TOWER GIVE THE PEOPLE BACK THEIR LAND.

HUM, the existing tower is "in your face"

yet when I do a search of light house pictures, I never saw one picture with that tower included. So is that tower really that much of a blight?
The tower was moved from its original and historical location, thus the preservation of the lighthouse itself was the important thing. The lighthouse was moved "under the shadow of the tower" and that was OK then.

I doubt anyone who goes to the light house will say, "dam, why the hell they put that stupid life saving tower next to this life saving lighthouse." To get a picture of the lighthouse, simply MOVE around the lighthouse. It is a cylinder, if that CG tower offends the photographer that much then the photographer simply moves their perspective.

100+ feet of tower will give an extended range. It is not like there is not a tower there already, 50 feet away. Unless someone is constantly picketing the site, or bringing it to visitors attention, it will not even be acknowledged. Yet many mariners will be thankful for it.

Give me a BREAK

You can see it from the historic light house... you can see the tower when you look at the light house... from some angles...

Your radio distress call can more reliably heard from longer range... when you're sinking in your boat, ship, downed plane...

hmmmm seems like a quite nice juxtaposition of old and new maritime rescue technology... maybe a reason for some sort of nice exhibit on the new ways to save mariners off the coast of one of the most historicaly trecherous capes in North America...

The historian not only wants the historical thing preserved... he wants its own private space... sure hope he doesn't ever get stuck sinking in a boat... just a little farther off shore than the old tower can hear.

What a joke ... build the darn tower...

Radio Tower

Give them the %$#@?&% tower. You may be the next one who needs the USCG!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Military Stories

More articles from: Military rss feed   


Toolbox