Lauren Roth
The Virginian-Pilot
©
Both Creigh Deeds and Bob McDonnell say they will reform education if they're elected governor. Each favors raising teacher salaries, finding private partners to enhance instruction in schools, expanding the number of charter schools, putting more focus on math and science, and routing more money to instruction.
Where they differ is in how to accomplish - and fund - those priorities.
McDonnell, the Republican candidate, believes that shifting some money from administration to the classroom will improve student performance and yield the roughly $200 million annually he says is needed to cover the state's share of a teacher pay raise.
"I have a plan to pay for it. And the plan is pretty simple. And that is, money to the classroom is much better spent than money in administration," said McDonnell, who has accused Deeds of mimicking some of his education proposals.
As a delegate, McDonnell sponsored only a few bills related to education. One attempted to require students to read an out-of-date citizens handbook.
Deeds, the Democrat, has consistently supported boosting educators' salaries - he pushed for funding as recently as 2008 - but he is less clear about how he'd pay for it. He's been endorsed by the Virginia Education Association, a powerful lobby that tends to back Democrats.
If the campaign rhetoric is one measure of where a candidate's focus lies, then a key prong of McDonnell's election argument is the economy, while Deeds has positioned himself as the education advocate.
Deeds has noted that McDonnell voted against some increases in education spending.
"Education's never been a priority for him. I don't think the guy has any credibility on the issue of education and the issue of teacher salary," Deeds said.
Deeds has bristled at a GOP-funded ad attacking him as a big spender for state budget amendments he submitted in 2008, including one for more than $870 million over two years to help raise teacher pay. Virginians can't expect excellence if they aren't even willing to pay for average, he said.
The contrast between the men's ideas on teacher pay is a glimpse into the larger philosophical divisions separating their political parties, according to one education expert.
"Democrats usually talk about improving public schools. Republicans want a more private enterprise model," said Jack Jennings, president of the Center on Education Policy in Washington. The group is an independent advocate for public education, funded by charities such as the Gates Foundation.
While McDonnell and Deeds agree on the need for public-private partnerships, charter schools and higher teacher pay, the similarities end there.
McDonnell is proposing what's known as the "65 percent solution" - moving money from the central office and administration to the classroom, so that instructional spending comes to make up 65 percent of all education spending. He estimates it now makes up 61 percent.
The idea, popular with some conservative groups, "is basically a rhetorical gimmick," said Andrew Rotherham, a member of the Virginia Board of Education from 2005 to 2009 and co-founder of Education Sector, an independent think tank in Washington.
"It becomes very difficult to define what is an instructional activity and what isn't," he added.
For example, reading resource teachers and guidance counselors don't fall easily into a category.
McDonnell has said the change, at a pace of 1 percent a year over 4 years, could save $480 million and pay for increased teacher salaries. It's not clear whether he can compel local school divisions to follow that ratio with their spending.
Compounding the policy difference are the complexities of education funding and the realities of an economy that has prompted billions in cuts to Virginia's budget.
State funding for schools is based on a complicated formula, and that formula has been the focus of some dispute during General Assembly budget-writing discussions.
Key funding sources are state tax revenues, lottery proceeds, federal aid and local matching money. How much localities pay is partly determined by a formula that measures community wealth.
Deeds has proposed having more school divisions sign up for state efficiency audits. That could produce $300 million in savings to be spent on classroom s and teacher salaries, he said.
McDonnell says savings can be found through technology. His proposals include increased use of online or electronic textbooks and virtual schools that allow students to pace themselves.
Part of Deeds' plan is to build on Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's early childhood initiative. Deeds said he wants to expand the number in the program by 20,000 over four years by enrolling more 4-year-olds from low-income families. He said that can be done through public-private partnerships.
"There's not a more important investment we can make other than to get children ready for school," he said.
McDonnell has expressed support for public and private programs to improve early reading skills, especially for at-risk children, but has not specified whether pre-kindergarten programs should be expanded.
Both men say they want to increase the number of charter schools in the state, currently at four.
Deeds said he prefers keeping the approval process in the hands of local school boards, a method experts say keeps charter school numbers low.
McDonnell supports changing the law to allow alternative approval methods for applications that have been denied and for those in districts where schools are not fully accredited.
He has also supported establishing income tax credits for instructional fees, private school tuition and home schooling costs.
The candidates each support a version of performance pay for teachers.
Deeds says the best students should be given incentives to go into teaching, particularly in high-needs areas.
McDonnell says teachers should be paid based on their performance.
"Almost all of the private sector uses a form of the concept," McDonnell said. "It's fundamentally good management."
Jennings, of the Center on Education Policy, said there have been "few completely successful experiments" with performance pay. They tend to peter out or create resentment between teachers.
"It's the culture of teaching," Jennings said. But there is still ground to explore with performance pay, he added.
Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo



True colors starting to show
Holy Funding! McDonnell Drops Live F-Bomb on live radio (WTOP)
http://www.nbcwashington.com/news/politics/Holy-F--ing-Funding-McDonnell-Drops-F-Bomb-in-Live-Interview-59170882.html
I'm sure his intentions for Virginia schools are not going to be used for road projects.
Admin jobs
McDonnell needs to be more specific on what he means by "administration." Is he talking about the administrators who work in the actual schools, or those who work in the central offices? If he's talking about the school positions, elementary principals with less than 300 but close to it are pushed to the edge when dealing with parents and the public. If he cuts admin positions in central offices, then he should have a plan as to who will write the curriculum that we are supposed to teach. The SOLs change, and as they do, so does the curricula. Sure, we teachers write curriculum to fit our needs, but central offices also write the tests that we use to measure student achievement. So, I wonder if any of this has been given any thought.
Both sides preach in order to get a vote.
Both sides preach in order to get a vote. The National Average Salary will not happen just like the politicians for the last 35 years before them could or would not make it happen. Just "stumping" for those votes and endorsements.
If McDonnell wants to reduce administration
Then he will need to reduce governement regulation and oversight....the state likes to create mandates for the localities but fails to provide money or resources to carry out their mandates. All these mandates require staffing and record keeping, that costs money.
Like SOL's, all they do is show us that kids can regurgitate facts on a multiple choice test. But those of us who see them come out in the workforce see that they not only can't change a light bulb, they have no clue what end to put in the socket.
Same old same old
I have lived here since Gov Dalton and every election the candidates promise two things 1) Reorganize VDOT and 2) More aid for k 12 education. And that includes both parties. THen when they get elected the fact that they would have to raise taxes brings them to their senses....
The story indicates it is
The story indicates it is "unclear" how Deeds would pay for teacher salary increases. I think it is perfectly clear. Deeds is a tax and spend democrat. Let's make it clear. He will increase our taxes to pay for it. It is time to put these socialist democrats in their place....outside of public service.
Deja vu all over again.
I'm trying to recall the last gubernatorial candidate that DIDN'T say he was going to increase teachers' salaries to match the national average. They promise that to woo the support of the powerful VEA and NEA. Of course, after the votes were counted, NONE of them have been able to accomplish it. They always seem to find a convenient excuse to renege on that promise. But, what truly astounds me is that the supposedly well-educated and intelligent members of the VEA and NEA go for that vote bait hook, line, and sinker every election year!
Further Evidence of McD's Narrow View...
Unfortunately, ALL candidates claim education as one of their top priorities, but after the ballots are counted, public education funding falls into the "if we have money pile."
Administrative costs are too high(local taxpayers should more carefully watch local administrative costs). However the 65% Solution is not the answer. McD's record on education funding has been abysmal over the years. His plan of cutting administrative costs to pay for teacher raises while at the same time starting charter schools (which receive public funding) and awarding income tax credits for instructional fees, private school tuition and home schooling would leave the precious few dollars available for public eduction in a competition where the children who attend public schools would lose.
PBP: In a conversation with McD he questioned the need for art teachers in elementary schools because all we do "is teach kids to color." So coloring in the lines would guarantee me a higher salary? Sums up his philosophy of life.
"Allow students to pace themselves." That one statement shows how out of touch he really is.
It should be handled to
It should be handled to where the teacher admission restrictions would be more strict and the education requirements would be more strict. We need to cut out the issues of allowing our students to merely walk away from high school, with a diploma, without learning how to even read or write. If they cannot pass the end of year tests, they should be held back to repeat that year again. Also, the tests should never be dumbed down to meet any demographic issues. What they are should be what they are, regardless of who takes them. The same thing needs to be applied to the police and emergency exams along with any other public service agency's exams.
Yipee!
Looks like either way this election goes, education will get some needed attention. The problem with performance pay for teachers is if it is handled the way most political issues are, it will really mess things up. Imagine what would happen, for example, if the performance pay were based on SOL scores. Good teachers would migrate en masse from urban schools where there are relatively many poor performers to suburban schools were better performance is easy to achieve. The end result being good teachers leaving the schools where they are needed the most for a bigger (and easier) paycheck on the edge of town.
Good luck, Governor!