New tests find unsafe levels of toxic PCBs in 2 local rivers

Posted to: Environment News Virginia

State investigators are using a new, more precise method for studying toxic PCBs this year in the Elizabeth and James rivers. And so far, the findings are not pretty.

In water samples, the new tests reveal excessively high levels of PCBs - polychlorinated biphenyls, a group of chemicals suspected of causing cancer in humans and animals - throughout much of the Elizabeth and portions of the James, the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality said Thursday.

Investigators earlier this year also found abnormally high levels of PCBs in parts of the Roanoke River in the western part of the state, but not as high as here.

The latest results, officials say, offer a clearer picture of how PCBs are contaminating rivers - mostly by washing off lands and waste sites, often during rain storms, and creating toxic conditions that violate state water standards.

In addition, officials say, the testing provides a better understanding of how some fish in these waters accumulate unhealthy amounts of PCBs in their body tissues, making them risky for humans to eat.

The fish pick up PCBs by swimming through contamination zones, but more so by gobbling up worms and other tiny aquatic life on the bottom of a river that is laden with the toxic chemicals.

For people who boat on the Elizabeth and James, the results Thursday should not change the state Health Department's assessment - that "in general, there is no danger," mostly because PCBs sink to the bottom of rivers into sediments.

Because of their cancer risks, PCBs have not been manufactured in the United States since the 1970s. Yet they continue to exist in the environment - in old transformers, flame retardants, adhesives, inks and carbonless paper that might be buried in the ground or dumped somewhere.

So while the state now has a better handle on how PCBs interact with the environment, officials still are not sure where the chemicals are leaking from so they can eradicate them.

That part comes next, officials say.

"As we continue our investigation, we will focus on pinpointing sources of PCBs so we can take steps to reduce contamination levels in fish," said David Paylor, director of the state Department of Environmental Quality.

The new testing method, begun this spring, centers on the ability of scientists to determine concentrations of PCBs down to the min uscule level of picograms, or in parts per quadrillion.

How small is that? One part per quadrillion is about the size of a postage stamp on an envelope as big as the states of Oregon and California combined.

The state safety standard for PCBs in water is 640 parts per quadrillion. In sample data released Thursday, the highest level on the Elizabeth River was recorded at a spot on the Eastern Branch in Norfolk, near Military Highway, at 187,000 ppq.

On the James, investigators found levels up to 233,000 ppq in several creeks near Hopewell and its industrial waterfront.

Most samples collected on the Southern Branch of the Elizabeth exceeded the state standard, the highest being at the mouth of Deep Creek in Chesapeake, at 140,000 ppq.

The Eastern Branch of the Elizabeth also showed excessive levels, but samples were within the standard on much of the Western Branch and along the main stem of the river through downtown Norfolk and Portsmouth.

Tests on the Lafayette River were inconclusive and the water will be re-sampled, said Bill Hayden, a state environmental department spokesman.

Joe Rieger, senior scientist with the Elizabeth River Project, said Thursday's news indicates that efforts must focus on finding sources of PCBs and wiping them out.

"It's another piece we'll have to address if we are to achieve our goal of making the river swimmable and fishable by 2020," Rieger said.

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Its pretty obvious where its coming from

They are now going to study where its leaching from ?
Isn't it obvious with hundreds of years of industry along the Elizabeth.
Its pretty easy to locate the old factory sites and find where the shipyards dumped everything.
Many people in the armed services will tell you about dumping transformers off of ships into the bays and rivers. Along with other debris. But that was then, hopefully that practice is not being done in local waters anymore.

Health scares etc

It looks like everyone posting is pretty much on the same page.Water pollution,of any type,should be a concern.Whether the stated levels of pcbs are an actual risk is the question.The American Council on Science & Health has a good article on health scares. http://www.acsh.org/factsfears/newsID.1226/news_detail.asp
I suppose that most people know that the antismokers are,at least,one of the greatest abusers of statistics.eg;Their usual claim is that ets contains 4,000 "harmful" chemicals.It doesn't.None are present in sufficient quantities to harm anyone.Almost all of these aren't considered harmful in the first place.Air quality testing done by OSHA,Oak Ridge Nat'l Lab.etc.,etc. all find ets levels to be safe. http://www.ornl.gov/info/press_releases/get_press_release.cfm?ReleaseNumber=mr20000203-00

A better job, a better chance at reaching a solution

I remember only too well a friend of ours who used to tell us that all these calls about the health dangers of eating fish from certain streams and rivers was a bunch of trumped up hooey. He'd been fishing and eating fish he'd caught from those waters for DECADES.

At 47 he was diagnosed with inoperable stomach cancer, a kind that is directly related to PCB contaminants. He didn't last a year after that.

It is good there are these kinds of efforts being made to trace where PCBs are leaching into our waterways. Like they said in the article: the better they can track it, the closer they can get to completely cleaning up our rivers and streams.

Government Trust?

That's the problem with the government doing these things. You never know if they are talking about a legitimate concern or if they are trying to legitimize their jobs. I'm a conservative who thinks man-made Global Warming is a hoax, but I do see runoff into our water supplies as something to be taken seriously. Us non-environmental engineers just don't know how to take these stories. If it's a real concern lets get something done about it if possible, but there’s always the fear that these stories are manufactured by some gov't employee or agency trying to justify their existence.

Global Warming a Hoax?

What would be the purpose of making global warming a hoax? Are we to assume that there is a world wide conspiracy in place to tout global warming? If so, then what is the agenda? motivation? Who is to gain" Lose?

Please elaborate, because real Conservatives, like to ones back in the 1970's were about Conservation hence the term Conservatives which included conservation of earths natural resources and fiscal policy. Today, I'm afraid Con-servatives have a new corporate benefactor such as the chemical companies that dumped these persistent chemicals in our waterways but many have packed up and moved on and left us with contamination that will last decades and will have to be cleaned-up by those trying to "legitimize" their desire to have a cleaner environment for their children and grandchildren.

After 400 Years of Trash, the River Still Holds Much

Common PCB sources include coolants and insulators for electric power purposes, plasticizers and insulators in paints applied to the hulls and deck matting used on vessels, coating on wires and cables and other sources and wastes conveyed by runoff from surrounding cities and locales. Sources - power plants and heavy industrial facilities with large energy loads, shipyards where toxic process wastewaters were and some still are allowed to go to the river without any treatment at all, metal recycling facilities where vehicles are scrapped and old wiring freed of insulating covers, and unfortunately - intentional dumping along the shore of the Elizabeth River and into its former depths. OK, so you find a location where the numbers are high, what then? Hold the nearest industrial facility responsible? Tag the nearest city with the responsibility since their pipe has PCB dribble? Look to the sediments as they hold the long-term history of the River. Look to scrap metal yards, shipyards, power plants. PCBs degrage slowly, the River knows.

Once

Once there were signs along the river not to fish or take crabs. PCB's go to the bottom. Signs should be re-erected warning against the catching of crabs.

Boys with toys.

Sounds to me like boys with a new toy. PCBs haven't been manufactured since the 1970s and yet we are still spending money and resources monitoring for them in levels of parts per quadrillion? Surely our resources could be more wisely spent by tackling more pressing and ongoing environmental issues at hand.

Quadrillion?

As technology becomes more able to measure smaller and smaller fractions of a whole, we have moved from parts per million (ppm) to parts per billion (ppb) to parts per trillion (ppt) to parts per quadrillion (ppq). PPQ is a ridiculously small fraction. PPT is one part per 1,000,000,000,000,000 parts. One PPQ is akin to 1 drop diluted into 49.8 million cubic meters. Just because we can measure it, doesn't mean it is relevant to health at that level. I am not advocating dumping PCB's into our waterways, but also let's use some common sense in choosing what are the real issues at hand. PCB production was banned in 1976, so this is entirely a legacy issue. Proper disposal of old PCB containing equipment is a must. But PCB's are very persistent in the environment. We can not make them disappear.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners

special features