70°
forecast

Norfolk agency moves to break ties with SPSA

Posted to: News Norfolk SPSA

NORFOLK

Like many of the region's trash customers, the city's housing authority has seen huge increases in its garbage pickup costs in recent years.

But unlike most private residents, the agency can do something about it.

This month, housing officials took the first step toward ditching the Southeastern Public Service Authority by soliciting bids from private trash haulers to take over garbage collection at its more than 3,200 households.

The move makes Norfolk's Redevelopment and Housing Authority one of the first - and largest - local organizations to attempt to dismiss the troubled trash agency and its skyrocketing costs.

"This is truly a responsible look at our expenses," said Shurl Montgomery, the housing authority's executive director. "With all the changes going on with SPSA, we have to make sure we're still competitive.

"I think you'll find a lot of folks will be doing this," she said.

The Southeastern Public Service Authority, which handles trash disposal throughout the region, has in the past three years raised its disposal rates on its member cities from $57 to $170 per ton of trash. Municipalities have, in turn, passed those costs onto customers.

Norfolk's housing authority has had a contract for the city to do trash collection - just as it does at private residences - since 1985.

But since early 2008, the authority has seen its bill double, from about $18,000 a month to more than $36,000, said Donna Mills, the director of property management. On top of that, an increase in bulk trash disposal rates has cost an additional $50,000 annually - even as the amount of bulk trash the authority collected has dropped.

The increases have come as federal funding for housing projects has decreased, so authorities have been ordered to make sure they're getting the lowest prices on every service.

"We're looking at everything," Ware said. "This is really just to test the waters and see what other prices and services might be available."

In response to its solicitation, the authority received three bids last week from private trash firms, Mills said. Agency officials are reviewing the bids and will decide in about a month whether a new company will take over garbage collection, she said.

Tom Kreidel, SPSA's spokesman, said he has not heard of any other customer jumping ship from regular municipal service.

"We're sorry to see any customer go, obviously," he said. "But this is more an issue of an issue, really, between the housing authority and the city."

The city shouldn't see a financial hit if it loses the housing authority contract, said Alice Kelly, assistant director of public works. Any loss of income for the city would be matched by less trash to pay SPSA to throw away, she said.

"Obviously, the revenue would go down but the costs for disposal would go down," she said. "We'd prefer for them to stay. But it will not impact us very much."

Even if the housing agency discontinues its use of city pickup, the garbage will probably still go to SPSA's landfill - just at a much lower dumping rate.

While Norfolk city crews are charged $170 a ton to dump trash at SPSA's facilities, private companies are charged $35 a ton, Kreidel said.

Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Unintended consequences

No, it does not do anything different in processing Suffolk's waste for $0.00/ton, the Navy's waste for $25/ton, the Commercial waste for $38/ton, the Beach's waste for $56/ton, and the other municipalities for $170/ton. That is the unintended consequence of two factors: first, a Supreme Court case that opened up the market place for competition for the commercial sector, and the effect of jurisdictions failing to pay back debt as necessary in the early years of the organization. That's why 80% of the SPSA waste stream pays very competitive rates while the remaining 20% pay very high rates. The average fee is about $65/ton, but that provides no relief to the six jurisdictions who are victimized by past bad decisions of their own representatives on the SPSA board.

Why different rates?

Why is the rate different - $35/ton vs. $170/ton - for municipal vs. commercial dumping? Does a ton of municipal waste take up 386% more volume than a ton of commercial waste? Is there 386% more toxic waste to be disposed of differently in municipal waste versus commercial waste?

Really, does SPSA do anything differently with municipal waste than commercial waste to generate different costs that would justify different prices?

Errors and Ommisions

Yes, what a shame that Ms. Hoyer simply got the facts wrong, and further, her editor, who presumably should know more, got it wrong as well. And to compound the error, the headline writer completely hosed up the article by saying that the Housing Authority was leaving SPSA when the article was wrong; fact is, they are considering having a private hauler pick up and dispose of their solid waste instead of the city's public works department. It will still be municipal solid waste when it crosses the scales at SPSA, and it should be charged at the municipal rate, not the commercial rate. I guess that this reporter is either new or inexperienced; no problem, I understand that. But the editors are supposed to have the bigger picture, and to have messed up this report so badly is inexcusable.

Needed corrections

"This is truly a responsible look at our expenses," said Shurl Montgomery, the housing authority's executive director. "With all the changes going on with SPSA, we have to make sure we're still competitive.

"I think you'll find a lot of folks will be doing this," she said.

Shurl is a he, not a she, at least the last time I spoke with him.

"We're looking at everything," Ware said. "This is really just to test the waters and see what other prices and services might be available."

And who is "WARE" in this story? No first name.

Zero sum game

I hate to question the judgment of the authority, and of course, if they shift to a commercial provider instead of the city to collect and dispose of their solid waste at SPSA, they may save on the disposal cost. However, there are two issues; first, each city member of SPSA has promised to dispose of 95% of its municipal waste at SPSA, and second, if the housing authority waste is collected by the private sector, and disposed of at SPSA at the commercial rate, SPSA will receive less revenue, and the municipal rate will increase to make up for this loss of revenue. So it is conceivable that Norfolk will deliver less waste but will be charged a higher rate per ton. If every "authority" of every member city did this, the loss of revenue to SPSA will be quite substantial and the increase in the municipal tip fee would increase significantly as well.

Can't wait

Can't wait to see how the SPSA poster-in-chief spins this to make SPSA look good. LOL

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox