The Virginian-Pilot
©
CHESAPEAKE
City Manager William Harrell on Thursday rejected a private proposal to widen Dominion Boulevard, replace the Steel Bridge and charge tolls of as much as $2.50.
Among the problems with the plan, Harrell said, is that it posed potential safety concerns for drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians; overestimated future traffic on Dominion; and underestimated the number of drivers who would dodge a toll there. C ity officials also worried whether the toll would be affordable.
Although another proposal from the group is welcome, he said, the city intends to move forward with its own largely unfunded $373 million plan to widen Dominion, replace the Steel Bridge and create a toll facility.
Officials revealed Thursday that the city had applied last month for a $150 million low-interest federal highway construction loan for the Dominion project. Chesapeake also has requested about $20 million in federal stimulus money.
"We are aggressively pursuing all options to get this project done," Harrell said.
Executives with the private group say they intend to resubmit a plan once they answer the city's questions.
"This was not unexpected," said S. Grey Folkes Jr., CEO of Hassell & Folkes, a Chesapeake engineering firm that is part of the development team. "I didn't think they were just going to take the proposal carte blanche and accept it. We were actually encouraged by the response. I think the questions they asked are appropriate. We look forward to providing some answers."
Harrell's decision means the City Council will not review the proposal now. If Harrell eventually accepts a plan from Folkes and his team, other groups will have at least 45 days to submit competing proposals. The council would have the final say.
The plan was the second submitted in Chesapeake in the past year that called for tolls. Harrell and the council support a proposal to replace the Jordan Bridge and charge a toll of about $2, and officials are waiting for a U.S. Coast Guard review.
The Dominion project would replace the existing two-lane drawbridge with a four-lane, 95-foot-high fixed span. T he Steel Bridge would have an electronic toll system so drivers would not have to stop to pay. The project could be completed within 48 months and cost between $300 million and $400 million, executives say.
Harrell, his staff and consultants reviewed it for about a month. On Thursday, the city manager produced a list of five "deficiencies" in the plan. Citing confidentiality, Chesapeake would not release the six-page letter officials sent to Virginia 104 LLC, the private development team that includes bridge contractor PCL Civil Constructors Inc.
Along with the safety issues, city officials said Virginia 104 did not demonstrate that it could meet the requirements of an environmental assessment already completed for the Dominion project. The group's financing plan was another issue, Harrell said.
"There were very few details in terms of how they would finance the project," he said.
While the private group proposed a toll of between $1 and $2.50, Harrell said he was worried that the toll would have to go higher to pay off the project.
"We feel like what we submitted in fact addresses the safety issues," Folkes said. "They may have some questions beyond some of the factors we thought about. And I just have to find out what concerns them."
While Harrell believes Virginia 104 has overestimated traffic counts, Folkes said that his group is still completing a more-detailed traffic and revenue study. The toll estimate is still in the works, as well, Folkes said.
"We're aware that toll rate drives the success of this project," Folkes said. "We think we're going to be able to prove to them that whatever toll rate and corresponding improvements are ultimately presented will, in fact, work."
Mike Saewitz, (757) 222-5207, mike.saewitz@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Private/Public
Maybe I'm grossly simplifying this matter, but if the City can get 170 million from various state and local funding sources and the developers can join in as a partner with a much cheaper road toll, can't the two sides agree to a partnership of some sort? Seems like a more logical approach than either side going it alone.
LOOKING...
I visited the Dept of Taxation and the Assembly as well as some news websites and all I can find is how much has to be cut because of declining road tax. Can anyone find how much was raised on road tax last year? (DMV/FUEL/OIL DISP FEE/TIRES/BATTERY DISP FEES/TOLLS. If no one can find the answer to those to name a few, how can we possibly be talking about raising taxes if we know not where we start? Balance that against our requirements and monies received from the feds. There's a lot of money out there somewhere folks.
rowboat and bike
By reading the posts carefully, you can see that the plan of the republicans to starve VDOT and the Commonwealth Transportation Board has actually worked. Citizens are so frustrated at the condition of our transportation system that they blame VDOT/CTB, or the city, or developers; few acknowledge that we, the citizens, have only ourselves to blame for believing the baloney fed to us by guys like Bob McDonnell, John Cosgrove, Speaker of the House Bill Howell, and the rest of the republicans in the Hampton Roads caucus. They have fed our fear and anxiety to the point that we really believe we can have a first class system paying half of what most states pay in gas tax. The result is we see conditions worse than in some third world countries, yet we are to blame for our own gullibility. So as stated herein, buy a row boat and a bicycle; soon, that may be the fastest way to get around Hampton Roads.
Not on either side
Not on either side politically as I think they are all crooks. But your "third world country" remark is just a tiny bit over the top. I mean maybe just slightly.
All you mention
All you mention as well as the democrats are to blame. The entire government is to blame. The government has allowed wasteful spending to grow out of control at the expense of legitimate government functioning. Once the wasteful spending is cut, we will have money for the roads. The people need not be burdened with extra taxes for land deals, pet projects, and graft any longer. This is not a democrat vs. republican issue; we need an all out independent audit on every dollar.
Jordan
My point is the City shouldn't take a BAD deal because it is the only deal. We don't want the taxpayers bailing out the private developers for a project that doesn't deliver. If one looks at what was proposed for Jordan, it was full of questions--we may be able to complete by a certain date; we may be able to start by a certain time; the toll may be a certain dollar amount. The problem: no plans were available so they had no idea what was being proposed. One possibility is the developer forced a quick decision to preclude other companies from bidding, while expecting to cover it's profits and shortfall from the taxpayers once the bridge got designed. That is why I applaud the City at Dominion for actually evaluating the proposal and sending it back if incomplete.
Time to cut spending
No need to raise taxes or tolls, they are already as high as they have ever been and the gov't has done fine in the past.
Start with the schools.
All schools need is a room with HVAC, a chaulk board, a well paid teacher and textbooks. That is all we had and we far outperformed this current generation. Time to face the facts, increased spending on education does not affect better results. All we do is spend spend spend. Time to audit audit audit.
After schools, move to housing and urban development, and social services.
Can we please get politicians that promise to cut spending? Or at least contract out the economic cost analysis to procurement professionals?
We've all seen how bad the
We've all seen how bad the traffic can be on this road, adding two lanes would only temporarily solve the traffic problem. When will our area leaders plan for the future and not the present? Three lanes are needed both ways to prevent another bridge from being built in our lifetime.
If a wreck happens, more then likely, one direction will fully close. An additional lanes still provides access for traffic even in these unfortunate circumstances. Build it bigger, I'm tired of everything bottle necking in this area. 64W goes from 4 lanes to 2 a couple miles before HRBT, Traffic!. 64E does the same at the HRBT, Traffic!. 64E goes from 4 lanes to 2 for the High Rise, Traffic. Down town tunnel. Traffic!
Get the point?
Finally, thoughtful action
It is good to see the City take responsibility for developing its own plan instead of simply accepting an unfocused plan from the for profit crowd. As many note, a $2.50 toll is too much to pay for this critical route into the heart of Chesapeake; that is, if it's only $2.50. The problem with these so-called private projects is the City or State gets stuck with the shortfall if the projections are inaccurate. You may end up with exorbitant tolls and taxpayer relief too. As for the Jordan Bridge, it wouldn't be delayed if it hadn't been crammed down the City's throat. No engineering plans for the bridge, nor business plans were ready when permits were sought. Now thoughtful folks are criticized for raising issues that normally get covered in the upfront process.
I have to respectfully
I have to respectfully disagree. What plans has the city made for the replacement of the Jordan? None at all. The only plan is the one proposed by a private company.
In the meantime, one important water crossing after another is crumbling away. The problem isn't having something "crammed down their throats" (although I wish someone would!) the problem is the city won't "extract a digit" and act!
We'll be using row boats to cross the Elizabeth if we continue to wait on Chesapeake to do something!