78°
forecast

Defense bill funds deeper channel in Mayport, Fla.

Posted to: Military Norfolk

Hampton Roads’ congressional delegation has lost the battle to halt the spending of $76 million for dredging and docking upgrades at a Florida naval base.

But local lawmakers say the war with Florida over the larger issue – the possible permanent move of an aircraft carrier from Norfolk to Mayport Naval Station – will go on.

A House-Senate conference report on the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal 2010 contains the money for the Mayport dredging, despite the Virginia delegation’s efforts to block it. The full House is expected to approve the measure today , with a Senate vote scheduled next week.

At the Virginians’ insistence, the conferees included language making it clear that the upgrades at Mayport are intended to facilitate temporary docking and are not necessarily a precursor to establishing Mayport as a permanent homeport for a nuclear-powered carrier.

Nevertheless, Florida lawmakers clearly see the project as the first step in that direction.

In a news release Wednesday announcing the approval of the dredging funds, U.S. Rep. Ander Crenshaw, R-Fla., cited Defense Secretary Robert Gates’ support for ending Norfolk Naval Station’s status as the only homeport for nuclear-powered carriers on the East Coast.

Gates and Adm. Gary Roughead, the chief of naval operations, say it’s a strategic risk to have the entire East Coast carrier fleet in one place, vulnerable to a terrorist attack or hurricane.

Mayport lost its only aircraft carrier when the conventionally powered John F. Kennedy was decommissioned in 2007.

U.S. Rep. Glenn Nye, a Hampton Roads Democrat who was one of the budget conferees, said in a statement that he strongly disagreed with the decision to fund the Mayport dredging project. But he added that he was pleased with the restrictive language added by the conferees.

“The Navy has said on multiple occasions that the dredging would only be for transient docking,” Nye said.

“That restriction is written in the conference report language, and I intend to hold them to that pledge.”

However, Rep. Randy Forbes, another conferee, said the conference report is a cause for worry in Hampton Roads. “I am gravely concerned,” the local Republican said in a statement, that it “may lay the foundation to send an aircraft carrier to Mayport.”

With shrinking defense budgets and the prospect of losing more than 5,000 sailors and their families, Virginia politicians have lobbied hard to keep all five Norfolk-based carriers and their as­sociated economic benefits.

In April, under pressure from the Virginians, the Pentagon said the question of moving a carrier to Mayport would be studied as part of its upcoming Quadrennial Defense Review, delaying a final decision until 2010.

 

Bill Sizemore, (757) 446-2276, bill.sizemore@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Congrats, JAX!!

Better climate, better base, better place to live. I applaud those lucky sailors who will be transferred there. Now, I can take my "YES OLF" sign down for good, since my pacifist neighbors keep stealing it.

Jacksonville Carrier

Why is the Navy worried about having four carriers in Norfolk when they now have five carriers in Newport News Shipbuilding?

Carrier Move

Remember Pearl Harbor! By the way we now have AM & FM radio!

Less Traffic! I drive to NOB everyday the congestion is less dependent on the number of carriers in port and more dependent on the latest hair brain gate closure plain that the base has implemented. Oh by the way in the eighties we had more then twice the number of ships and less parking on the base, and had fewer parking issues, yet on any given day waterfront parking is almost none existing.

Mayport really doesn’t want the carrier! Mayport wants the BILLIONS in construction money that would flow in to support a nuclear carrier! They took such good care of the JFK why not give them another.

much ado about nothing

Carriers [and other military based groups] have come and gone with limited [or no] impact to the economy of this area. This is nothing more than a bloviating, re-election issue to Nye and Webb.

And you would think Webb would know this considering his former employment...

Webb and Nye not getting it done.

Maybe Jim ("Born Fighting"?) Webb will pitch a fit and quit (again) if this doesn't go his way.

And Glenn (I wanted to serve my country, but chose the cushy State Department instead of the military) Nye is in way over his head and is totally irrelevant in Washington.

i'm confused

I thought Senator Webb was born fighting?
Isn't he going to save the carrier for Virginia?

sooner the better

way less traffic conjestion , higher wages , more jobs for people who are residents ,

Strategy

Doesn't common sense tell you to spread out at least one nuclear carrier in case of an attack or accident?

Remember Pearl Harbor?

Morons.

Now that funny

You used the phrase "common sense" when discussing the democrat from Virginia.

There is no "common sense" involved. It's about "their as­sociated economic benefits", and votes. No common sense.

It's always about the money

You are right aalto.

'It's about "their as­sociated economic benefits", and votes.'

I really didn't want to go there, but since you brought it up.

This is about MONEY not national security.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features