©
Individual members of the Virginia Legislative Black Caucus have been bold advocates for curbs on predatory lending, but it's disappointing to see that the group as a whole remains bashful about confronting the scurrilous and destructive industry.
Advocates for reform took hope last week that the caucus would formally back a 36 percent interest rate cap on all small consumer loans, but the announcement never arrived.
Caucus chairman Kenneth Alexander of Norfolk said his staff circulated a draft of a letter favoring the cap but added "the staff may have gotten ahead of the caucus."
Alexander serves on a committee studying whether new restrictions are needed on car title loans.
"It would be very inappropriate for me as chairman of the caucus... to pre-empt the committee's work by taking a position," he said this week. "If you're on a committee you should be very open and sincere and leave all of your biases and check that stuff at the door."
Lawmakers on the committee who support payday and title lenders have not embraced that noble advice.
Senate Majority Leader Richard Saslaw and Sen. Thomas Norment of James City have been bellicose in their opposition to meaningful industry reforms. The black caucus could serve as a crucial counterbalance in the debate, but instead it is missing in action despite being called out by NAACP Chairman Julian Bond for their silence.
Sen. Mamie Locke of Hampton and other caucus members deserve credit for their efforts to win reforms, but they are undermined by their organization's cozy financial relationship with payday and title loan companies. This spring, Community Loans of America gave $2,500 to the caucus. The caucus is the second largest recipient of donations from the company after House Speaker Bill Howell. Individual members have also shared in the bounty, including Del. Algie Howell of Norfolk, who collected a $500 check this year, according to the Virginia Public Access Project. Howell said he nevertheless supports a 36 percent interest rate cap.
Predatory lenders are eager to make friends because they're pushing legislation that would formally recognize them as a legitimate industry under state law.
That's a mistake Virginia has already made once with payday lenders, and one that the state and hundreds of families lured by unscrupulous practices are still paying for today.
In Tennessee, which has granted title lenders recognition, the companies charge annual interest rates between 120 percent and 360 percent and a majority of the businesses routinely repossess the vehicles of customers trapped by excessive debts.
The Hampton Roads Chamber of Commerce and other respected business groups recognize the folly of that approach. They support a 36 percent interest rate cap because they understand the harm predatory lending has visited on their communities. Many members of the black caucus also live in the region and have witnessed those same abuses. It's time for the group to take a stand.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
The gap between Promised and Possible
I think the Assembly is taken aback by the gap between what they promised constituents and what is possible through legislation. Protection from the cycle of debt starts with the consumer, not the politician. If more and more people are maxed out on credit, it becomes a leaking dam that the state can only put its finger in. A solution should come from the people, not the government.
I think a 20% cap would be
I think a 20% cap would be preditory and outragious.
Unfair to call loans predatory
This article was completely one-sided. When responsible borrowers are involved, payday loans are easy to pay back. Because the borrower PLANS AHEAD and knows when they will have money and be able to pay their loan. However, when irresponsible borrowers are involved, it is still unfair to say these loans are predatory. I have used payday loans a few times and they have helped me out of binds, and I paid them back in 2 weeks. The Legislative Black Caucus (and other legislators) are unfairly trying to limit a solution for responsible borrowers.
Are only blacks..
affected by these transactions? Is it only 'wrong' to engage in these practices if the Black Caucaus says so? Geezz.. You gotta hoot at the actions of the Caucus, it appears, per the Editorial, that THEY have been bought off by this industry. When it comes to insuring one's political future, as opposed to looking out for one's 'own kind', the political future will win every time!
How soon before these same agitators like the Pilot start demanding that banks and other regular financial institutions provide for these folks who have to use these lenders? That's a big part of what got this country into the present economic mess it's in, in the mortgage industry. Just wait, we'll see where banks that don't give loans to high credit risks are 'racist' and the other usual derogatory labels. Like I said, just wait!
SAY "NO" TO PREDATORY LENDING
In today's editorial section of the Virginian-Pilot, my opponent is quoted as supporting a 36% lending cap: http://hamptonroads.com/2009/10/disturbing-silence-predatory-loans
This cap is woefully inadequate to protect people from predatory lending. Very few people can escape from the noose of a 36% loan. It is an unethical business practice to trap people in this way.
As a tax preparer, I stopped offering next-day loans years ago because they are such a bad deal for people. I lost some clients because of my decision.
I will support a 24%, or less, cap on lending in Virginia. Allowing unethical businesses to exploit people in need is simply wrong. I pledge to not take money from predatory lenders or their political action committees.