Hampton Roads, VA - 11/20/2009
Scattered Clouds62°Scattered Clouds
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Investment bank seeks to finance $1.5 billion Midtown Tunnel project

Posted to: Banking and Finance Business News Transportation and Traffic


For years, Australia's biggest investment bank has been raising billions for airports, tunnels and toll roads throughout North America, Europe and Asia.

Now the Sydney-based bank Macquarie Group Ltd. is seeking to help finance construction of a new Midtown Tunnel, upgrade the Downtown Tunnel between Norfolk and Portsmouth and extend the Martin Luther King Freeway.

Macquarie and its construction-company partner Skanska formed a joint venture called Elizabeth River Crossings, which is negotiating with the Virginia Department of Transportation to finance, build and operate the $1.5 billion project. An interim agreement with VDOT is scheduled to be in place next month.

In presentations to government officials and an independent review panel, Elizabeth River Crossings called attention to Macquarie's success at raising more than $8 billion in recent years for toll-road projects in the United States.

But financial markets have been jolted during the past year by heavy losses and investors' aversion to risk. That's likely to make the job of raising money for the tunnel-and-expressway project more complicated.

"The folks providing debt are being far more cautious," said Michael Garvin, a civil engineer and associate professor at Virginia Tech who has studied construction projects by public-private partnerships. Lining up financial commitments "is going to be a challenge for at least a couple of more years."

The schedule for the tunnel-and-expressway project calls for Elizabeth River Crossings to have a comprehensive agreement with VDOT by early 2011 and to close on financing that spring.

In an evaluation of the Skanska-Macquarie proposal, VDOT determined earlier this year that the two companies are financially qualified and capable of lining up the money to build and maintain the project. But because of uncertainty in financial markets, the report said, "Macquarie's ability and willingness to provide a significant direct investment in the project should be monitored," said the report, issued May 13.

Macquarie, it noted, was initially engaged as a partner in two recent toll-road projects - one in Florida and another in British Columbia - but later withdrew.

"Overall, it is a strong company," said Deborah Brown, VDOT's innovative finance officer and co-author of the report with the department's chief financial officer. Given the environment for financing these types of projects, "we still felt it was wise to continue to monitor their condition."

Paula Chirhart, a Macquarie spokeswoman, noted that the company continued to serve as financial adviser for the Florida and British Columbia projects and remains active in financing infrastructure projects.

"The partners in Elizabeth River Crossings are absolutely committed" to the one proposed for Norfolk and Portsmouth, Chirhart said.

Their plans for financing the tunnel -and-expressway project call for borrowing $1.2 billion, including $600 million of low-cost debt available through a federal loan program established a decade ago by the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act, Chirhart said. The two companies, she said, also expect to raise $525 million of equity.

The equity provided by Macquarie and Skanska would be an important buffer and could generate greater interest from prospective lenders.

"It's no different than what the banks look at when they give you a mortgage," said Garvin of Virginia Tech. "If you put 20 percent down, you don't have to pay private mortgage insurance."

In addition, the companies' plans for using low-cost funds from the Department of Transportation program likely will make the project's other debt more attractive to lenders, he said.

Macquarie, whose operations span 26 countries, escaped the heavy losses from mortgage-backed securities and credit-default swaps that battered many U.S. banks last year. However, its earnings for the fiscal year that ended March 31 fell by more than 50 percent partly because of write-downs in the value of troubled assets on its books and increased provisions for loan losses.

Macquarie is well respected in the world of financing for infrastructure, Garvin said, and "they have some really talented people." But the bank, he said, attracted attention for the prices it was willing to pay for some U.S. toll roads, including the Chicago Skyway. With the recession, the prices paid for some projects came back to haunt the bank because the traffic and toll revenue fell, he noted.

In many cases, Macquarie packaged the toll roads it financed and sold them to independent, publicly traded "satellite" funds that the bank manages, including a Macquarie Infrastructure Group fund. Because of shrinking values at some of the funds, they're unlikely to be sources of financing for the Elizabeth River Crossings project.

While investors in toll roads and other projects are less tolerant of risk than they were two years ago, they still are attracted to dependable, long-term returns, Garvin said. For the Macquarie-Skanska team to line up those investors, it must devise a system of tolls that tunnel-and-expressway users are willing to pay.

"If you've got a good business case and a reliable funding stream, you'll find the financing," he said.

Tom Shean, (757) 446-2379, tom.shean@pilotonline.com



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

Myth Number 5

Another one of the myths perpetuated by the anti tax, anti government zealots is that we don't get our fair share of revenue from the state, claiming that our share goes too much to NoVa and the rural sections of the Commonwealth. It is interesting to note that anti tax republicans from those areas always run on the same plank, this is, they too are donor regions, but that is just politics. What do the experts say? In the last state of the region report, the basic conclusion was..."It does not appear that Hampton Roads has a strong basis for arguing that it is being underfunded relative to other VDOT transportatyion districts. The problem, bluntly, is that there isn't enough money to go around." And in regard to that, it is clear that the anti tax republicans in the House of Delegates are fine if we vote to tax ourselves, but they will not do it for us. Stand by for more abandoned bridges, potholes, closed rest stops, and no new construction. You get what you pay for.

Squash that notion

Until the unfair formula that sends Tidewater's road tax money to Northern or rural Virginia is fixed, put the idea completely out of your mind that any reasonable person here would support tolls projects. Why would locals support toll roads here when our taxes would pay for the roads, if the money stayed here?

You politicians looking for votes should pay attention to this, because supporting this unfair redistribution of road taxes will get you voted out of office. There's nobody in Richmond fighting for the citizen. We're just a never ending pot of money for whatever pork some politician wants to sell us. Look at the choices for Governor now- spendaholic Deeds or No Abortion at any cost McDonnel. I'm writing in Mickey Mouse.

It's no formula

Problem is we have at least two un-elected bodies submitting ideas to the state for transportation needs in Tidewater. Unfortunatly, neither of them has any idea what they are doing, and the ineffectual "leaders" that make up these groups cannnot agree on what is important, so they lay out 6 projects all evenly scored, with no plan to execute any of them.

So yes. NOVA gets funds because they have a solid plan ready to execute. Rural Virginia gets funded because they have a solid plan ready to execute. Tidewater gets laughed at because the local "leaders" are too busy touting the "me/mine" syndrome to do anything regional.

wow

Lets look at these two complaints shall we? Spendaholic, which I take it to mean he spends a LOT of tax money which raises taxes for all of us to cover it all. OR No abortion guy, who will stop abortions which honestly affect maybe what? 1-2% of people? Maybe less? So we have something that effects 100% or something that effects 1-2% (guessing)... As I like to keep my own money and I don't plan on having an abortion (mainly because I'm a guy), it sorta seems like a NO brainer to me, but if you need more help feel free to let me know.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Business Stories

More articles from: Banking and Finance rss feed    Business rss feed    News rss feed    Transportation and Traffic rss feed   


Toolbox