©
Groups like the National Rifle Association have long insisted that government should enforce existing gun laws rather than pass new ones. A bipartisan group of mayors from 450 cities, including some in Hampton Roads, is urging the Obama administration to heed that advice.
Mayors Against Illegal Guns, led by New York City’s Michael Bloomberg and Boston’s Thomas M. Menino, recently presented 40 gun-related recommendations to the White House and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.
The group — whose members include mayors from Norfolk, Virginia Beach, Portsmouth, Newport News and other Virginia cities — hasn’t released the document, but The Washington Post obtained a copy and reported that it focuses on bolstering ATF resources and expanding enforcement of existing laws.
Among other things, the group calls for:
- Aggressive prosecution of people who fail background checks while trying to buy guns. The FBI referred almost 68,000 cases in 2005, but prosecutors pursued only 135.
- Giving the ATF $53 million to hire more field agents to inspect dealers more frequently. Right now, the report says, the agency is falling far short of its goal of checking dealers once every three years.
- Requiring manufacturers to hide a second serial number on guns because criminals often file off visible numbers.
So far, it appears the most controversial idea involves gun shows. The mayors want the ATF to conduct undercover investigations to ensure dealers are running background checks. The agency lacks a formal enforcement program.
Monitoring compliance is a reasonable idea, but gun groups have been engaged in a bitter fight with the mayors over gun show regulations. The NRA encourages its members to pressure mayors to drop out of Mayors Against Illegal Guns, chiefly over this issue.
Last week Mayor Bloomberg announced the results of an investigation of gun shows in Nevada, Ohio and Tennessee . He said investigators posing as buyers obtained guns illegally in almost three out of four instances.
Besides stricter enforcement of existing laws, the mayors have repeatedly called on Congress to require everyone selling guns at shows to conduct background checks.
Licensed dealers must run checks to screen out felons and others who aren’t allowed to acquire firearms. But, according to Virginia State Police estimates, 22 to 35 percent of people selling guns at shows are private sellers who can choose whether to run checks — and often don’t.
It’s unlikely the NRA will ever fully agree with the mayors, but they should look for compromises that involve enforcing existing laws.
In the absence of a compromise, however, the Obama administration should press ahead with more rigorous enforcement and closing the gun-show loophole. The goal isn’t to making gun groups happy. It’s to make it as difficult as possible for criminals to get guns.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
I don't see where anyone
I don't see where anyone should object to giving their personal info (Name, DOB, SSN) to a private individual they met for the first time at a gun show so that a background check can be made. What other purpose could they use the info for.
Have you ever heard of
Have you ever heard of identity theft?
enforcement
It always amazes me how the people who claim the most strongly that they are law abiding citizens are the ones who don't want the laws enforced.
Therein lies the rub
Law abiding citizens, just by the nature of the name do abide by the laws and do want them enforced. The problem lies in the fact that instead of enforcing common sense laws, idiots like Mayor Bloominidiot, and all other haters of the 2nd Amendment, want MORE laws, that once again ONLY are obeyed by the law-abiding.
The law-abiding are sick and tired of having more and more of their rights and liberties restricted for these feel-good shows that don't do anything to combat the criminal element.
selective enforcement
"---common sense laws,---"
The problem I see is that people have their own view on what is "common Sense" and what isn't. For example, why not enforce the background check law on ALL gun sales at shows? Why not enforce the number of guns that can be bought by any one person per year, with the stipulation of replacing a broken one?
I am not a "gun control freak", having been raised to hunt. I have no objection to private ownership of guns. What I DO object to is the people buying and reselling large quantities to people from restrictive states.
I also object to the notion that gun registration is a prelude to confiscation.
Check History
"""I also object to the notion that gun registration is a prelude to confiscation."""
Tell that to the Canadians, British, and Germans...........
I used to have the same objection, then I started paying attention not just to my WWII history, but current (recent past) events.
When I legally purchase a firearm, there is a record of it, nothing more is needed. Once again, such laws only affect the law abiding.
There is truth in the canard "When guns are outlawed, only outlaws will have guns." Criminals do not obey laws.
Conststution
"Tell that to the Canadians, British, and Germans"--
I haven't read what is in the constitutions of those countries, but I don't think they have an equivalent clause to our second amendment. If you are going to quote the constitution as an authority, then you must also depend on it for protection.
Enforcement of gun laws
Although I appreciate your editorial that encourages support of enforcement of background checks at gun shows, you have an error in your editorial comments. Even if private sellers want to do a background check, the Commonwealth does not allow private sellers to conduct background checks throuh the Instant Background Check system (NICS). This is the gaping loophole for criminals, terrorists, and other ineleigible buyers to exploit. As you pointed out, 22-35% of the sellers are private sellers with no limit on the number of guns they sell. To see how this works at a gun show, take a look at the video clip enclosed.
http://www.gunshowundercover.org/
For the last 7 years public safety advocates have been trying to eliminate the loophole by requiring all gun buyers at gun shows to have a background check. Other states such as California have closed the loophole by requiring a federally licensed dealer to perform the check for private sellers. This has worked and does not impact on gun show sales.