Norfolk housing authority wants to refund $1 million

Posted to: News Norfolk

NORFOLK

Nine years after receiving a federal HOPE VI grant to tear down two public housing complexes and build the neighborhood of Broad Creek, Norfolk officials say they can't spend all the money.

In a letter to federal officials, the city's housing authority this week offered to for go more than $1.3 million in federal funding so the city can end the project by June 30, 2010.

The refunded money is slightly less than 4 percent of the original $35 million grant the department of Housing and Urban Development awarded to Norfolk in 2000 to develop the community. The HOPE VI money helped pay to demolish the aging Bowling Green and Roberts Village communities, relocate residents and rebuild housing in the new mixed-income neighborhood.

Located off Ballentine Boulevard and Princess Anne Road, the community was the site for Homearama in 2005, an annual show of luxury homes hosted by Tidewater Builders Association.

"We've always been taught never to return any money," said John Kownack, chief housing reinvention officer for the city's housing authority. "But the grant really is over. The project is over."

HUD spokeswoman Donna White said returning unused money is not typical for HOPE VI recipients, but she added that it sometimes happens when authorities change their development plans.

The Norfolk Redevelopment and Housing Authority's board agreed last year to build 40 fewer public housing apartments than originally planned, saying Broad Creek could not accommodate additional rental units.

"We did that willingly and purposefully to try to ensure the neighborhood would be stable and sustainable," Sheppard Miller III, the board's chairman, said.

"Everything else was done. So we saved the taxpayers some money and we did what we said we were going to do. For me, it's a good thing to give money back."

Several years ago, the housing authority finished building the 354 apartments that qualified for federal funding. Although market-rate houses still are being built at Broad Creek, they don't qualify for HUD funding. The city won't tackle the final phase of the neighborhood - Village Center, along Princess Anne Road - until the housing market recovers.

In recent years, the authority has been using remaining grant money for its first-time homebuyers program. But spending the last of the funds could take years, officials said. Meanwhile, Norfolk has been penalized when applying for new HOPE VI funding because it hasn't wrapped up the first grant. "In a perfect world, we'd continue to try and use every drop of money," Kownack said. "But there comes a time when you have to close it out."

Moton Circle, a small public-housing complex next to Broad Creek, has lost out on $20 million in HOPE VI funding twice. The city this year declined to even apply for a third time because officials were told they had no chance of receiving it if Broad Creek's grant remained open.

NRHA executive director Shurl Montgomery said ending Broad Creek's grant by the end of June would clear the way to submit a funding application for Moton Circle next summer or fall.

The grant closure plan submitted to HUD this week for Broad Creek calls for $1 million in federal money to go toward creating an endowment to help former Bowling Green and Roberts Village residents with job training, transportation and child care needs.

The plan also gives the housing authority's homeownership programs another eight months to provide down-payment assistance to low- and moderate-income homebuyers anywhere in the city. Federal officials originally had offered to close the HOPE VI loan immediately, but NRHA persuaded them to leave it open until the middle of next year to aid nearly four-dozen buyers already in the pipeline, Kownack said.

"We're trying to use as much of the funds to assist as many homebuyers as we can," Kownack said. "There are 45 people waiting for homebuyer assistance that we didn't want to freeze out."

Montgomery said even though the authority didn't make use of all its federal grant, it was able to revitalize the area and spur private development. The value of the neighborhood, he said, was far greater than the $35 million in grant funding.

"The whole purpose of HOPE VI was to leverage other money," he said. "It's even more successful than people imagined."

Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

HOPE VI

TRAP VI would be a better description.

NRHA con't

These home's were not worth a dime in their condition. My grandchildren live in a house's which are unsafe in neighborhoods which are questionable. The houses cannot be resold for what they cost let alone the added "loans". One of them just got a new neighbor who was convicted of "killing a child". I'm angry with NRHA for taking advantage of people trying to make it in this economy and my children & their spouses for not listening us when we told them to beware of the wolf.

Its hard to believe

That everything is done..nothing else can be done to improve the infrastructure of this project..all gas water power and communication systems dont need any improvment or long needed maintenance..all roads sidewalks and intersections are cleaned up and safe..road markings and signage..landscaping????I live in Norfolk and I find its hard to believe..think Ill ride around and check things out

NRHA

Not Really Helping Anybody but themselves. I'm curious, what is the salary of each of the administrators running this so called "authority"? Two of my children got caught up in the empty promises of this group and bought their homes in your "fine" city. Don't get me wrong, I blame my children for falling for this scheme as much as I blame NRHA, because my spouse & I tried to tell them it was a bad deal. Now one has sewage backing up into her yard every couple of months & the other lives in a house which was built in 1927, full of lead paint covered with enamel paint (cause that's all you need to do according to the government to fix the lead problem). One had money added into the loan to help meet down payment requirements, the other received a loan for improvements after closing. The catch is they must live in the home for at least 10 years or pay back the money & they had to buy in "qualified" areas and use only contractors on a list provided by NRHA.

Shurl's Salary

The director makes around $150,000.00 a year.

Nice gig.

Money Return

Stupid,stupid,stupid,stupid,stupid,stupid,stupid,stupid,stupid! This confirms my suspicions of NRHA.

NRHA SHOULD BE EMBARRASSED!

The HOPE VI money wasn't meant to line the pockets of NRHA staff until they couldn't spend it anymore. The money was intended to benefit Bowling & Roberts residents and others. Only NRHA thinks not getting the job done is a success. Should be no need for NRHA to request local taxpayers money for Broad Creek, right?

“In a perfect world,

“In a perfect world, we’d continue to try and use every drop of money,”

How offensive.

NRHA Culture

“We’ve always been taught never to return any money,” assistant executive director John Kownack said. "

This is the mindset of those at NRHA. SPEND SPEND SPEND.

Same thing from Norfolk City Council. SPEND SPEND SPEND.

This is a first and will probably never happen again in our lifetime.

“In a perfect world, we’d continue to try and use every drop of money,” Kownack said."

Perfect world? Stop the insanity! Dissolve the NRHA for the good of the taxpayer.

And get rid of the BIG spenders downtown.

Its not just the NRHA it is

Its not just the NRHA it is the prevailing mindest at every level of Government and in the Miltary.

Not spending your entire budget is completely unnaceptable.

It is frightening how ingrained that concept is in management mentality everywhere...

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features