74°
forecast

Report: Coal plant would add 'harmful' amount of mercury to Chesapeake Bay

Posted to: News Western Tidewater

NORFOLK

A proposed coal-fired power plant in Surry County would add “significant and harmful” amounts of mercury and other pollutants to the Chesapeake Bay and several river systems in coastal Virginia already suffering from excessive mercury levels, a study released Wednesday concludes.

Commissioned by the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, an environmental group, the study says the proposed plant in the town of Dendron, an hour west of Norfolk, would damage the James River, the Pamunkey River, the Great Dismal Swamp, the Blackwater River, the Nottoway River and the Roanoke River. Parts of these waterways are under health advisories due to high samples of mercury in some fish species that people eat.

Speaking at a press conference in Norfolk, William C. Baker, the president of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said state and federal regulators should deny environmental permits for the power plant, which Old Dominion Electric Cooperative wants to build at a cost of between $4 billion and $6 billion. The proposed Cypress Creek Power Station would be one of the largest coal-fired power plants in the state. Baker said regulators have no choice but to deny the permits; to allow more mercury pollution in water systems already impaired by mercury, he added, would violate the Clean Water Act.

The ODEC plans “not only are illogical but illegal, and we are prepared to fight,” Baker said.

Jeb Hockman, a spokesman for the Richmond-based cooperative, said the proposed plant is the subject of ongoing government reviews and that plans call for strict anti-pollution technology. Hockman also questioned the validity of the study and said the plant is needed to keep pace with growing demands for electricity in Virginia households and businesses.

Ann Jennings, Virginia director of the Chesapeake Bay Foundation, said the study was conducted with ODEC-supplied data by a California consultant, H. Andrew Gray. His company, Gray Sky Solutions, used computer models approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to estimate pollution fallout on local waterways, including the Bay.

Hockman said the foundation fed an inaccurate estimate of projected mercury emissions from the Surry County plant -- 210 pounds per year -- into computer models. But Jennings said this was incorrect, that the modeling was based on a more conservative estimate of 118 pounds of mercury per year.

The proposed power plant has become a political issue in state elections this fall. Candidates for the state House of Delegates in Surry County differ on whether the project is a good one, while the two gubernatorial candidates offer slightly different views on the subject. Republican Bob McDonnell favors the plant as a way to meet future energy needs and create jobs, while Democrat Creigh Deeds says he believes the state should keep a balanced portfolio of energy supplies, including coal-fired power plants, but would also press ODEC to be “innovative and creative” in their environmental designs.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Time for Nuclear Power

Time for politicians to educate the public about nuclear power. instead of bikering about health care which is catch 22 anyway. Darned if we do, darned if we don't. they need to be leaders and convince the public that every coal plant should be replaced with nuclear plants. they need to tell people that nuke plants have come along just like computers, cars and aircraft. If the USA goes all nuke, and then uses hydrogen fuel as a compliment, we can actually win at the carbon credit game and be strong once again, but this time energy independent.

Chesapeake Bay Foundation

The Ches. Bay Foundation was a group I used to support, but since they have turned into a "Global Warming" chicken little org, with leftist leanings, I no longer waste my time with supporting them. What I find a little troubling is how this newspaper prominantly posts this so called report, with obviously no fact checking. But then again, it's easier to post junk science than it is to come up with viable plans to supply our increasing electical needs...

Hypocrites on Mercury

Where's the public outcry over the mercury found in soon to be mandated "green" light bulbs that will be replacing our traditional incandescent bulbs?

These new fluorescent bulbs contain mercury and unlike incandescent bulbs, pose an opportunity for mercury poisoning should they accidently be broken. How will they be disposed of? Will mercury from these bulbs find their way to our water ways? Is condemning coal supposed to be some sort of "mercury credit" trade off for their "guilt" over these bulbs? Glad it makes them feel better.........

Green Hypocrites!

Hypocrites on Mercury

There is mercury in incandescent bulbs. So when you factor in a coal-fired plant, plus many more throwaway incandescent bulbs, the use of CFLs saves on mercury emissions when compared to the use of the older bulbs -- not to mention reduced electrical power demand, reducing in turn the amount of mercury released by coal as it is burned.

No mercury in Incandescent Bulbs

Your statement about mercury in Incandescent bulbs is false and only ties with bulbs powered by coal. But you make my point by pointing out that mercury filled CFLs are made even worse when powered by coal. Granted a lot of power comes from coal plants thanks to politics and nuclear fear mongering. I am not opposed to adding other sources of cleaner power. Or finding ways to make coal cleaner. Solar, wind, its all good. I am just opposed to the poisonous new bulbs.

Truth is we should ban cfl bulbs and embrace nuclear or other power sources. I'm not here to necessarily support coal, but to point out the idiocy of Fluorescent bulbs that require clean up and WILL be improperly disposed of, and pollute our environment.

Well of course

the Chesapeake Bay Foundation was going to be against this, one way or another! This Foundation has gone from a good, mainstream organization to a PETA-like bunch of extremists.

With a very partial sponsor

...would you expect any other type of report. I am sure the report findings were "pre-ordained" before any study was ever down, if it was done.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox