81°
forecast

Rising coastal waters threaten region, report says

Posted to: Environment News Virginia

NORFOLK

The threat to Hampton Roads from rising coastal waters over the next century is so great that the region "ought to be actively planning a system of dikes and levees unless we intend to forfeit huge portions of our land to the sea," concludes a section of the 2009 State of the Region report released Tuesday.

Compiled by experts at Old Dominion University and presented by former ODU President James V. Koch, the report also recommends that Hampton Roads start getting serious about controlling its carbon emissions, which are thought to accelerate climate change.

To that end, the report endorses green building practices for new construction and renovations. It also advocates a state tax increase on gasoline and diesel as a way to discourage motorists from driving - and polluting - so much.

In an interview Tuesday, Koch called climate change and rising sea levels "the

issue of the 21st century for this region," but one that local leaders and institutions so far have done little about.

The report minces few words in describing the stakes:

"In a nutshell," it reads, "here's what might happen: Large amounts of prime beach and waterfront property will sink underwater; our tunnels will periodically fill with water; our port facilities will incur huge costs in order to continue operating; many residential and commercial properties will become uninsurable; and certain wildlife and fauna will disappear."

Such consequences assume that Virginia and the United States do not tackle climate change in the years ahead, instead forecasting what may occur gradually over the next 100 years.

The report does not shy away from addressing the persistent skepticism that global warming even exists.

It cites a 2009 report by a branch of the Virginia Manufacturers Association that argues, "thirty percent of climate scientists worldwide disagree that human introduced greenhouse gases are causing climate warming and slightly over 14 percent are undecided because the science of climate change and global warming is ever-changing."

Nevertheless, the report adds, "very few reputable scientists dispute the contention that global warming is occurring, even though there is some disagreement over the precise cause of that warming."

State and local environmentalists applauded the report, saying they hope its data and warnings, which they have cited for years, will gain a wider acceptance because of the respect afforded to Koch and his annual reports.

"It's important because this is the first time someone who has the business community's ear is talking about this issue in a no-bones-about-it way," said Skip Stiles, the executive director of Wetlands Watch, a Norfolk-based environmental group.

Stiles also was a member of the Governor's Commission on Climate Change, which met last year before recommending a host of actions - but did not go so far as the report in urging dikes, levees and a gas-tax hike.

Koch said he had no specific places in mind where dikes and levees should be planned or built, only that without such help, waterfront properties - including ports and military bases - will face increased flooding and damage.

He said the Netherlands is a world leader in constructing water-control devices and is engaged in a massive, national effort to stem rising seas off the Dutch coast.

The Army Corps of Engineers, which would have to sign off on any levees or dikes, said Tuesday that it already is factoring in sea-level rise in other infrastructure projects and will continue to do so.

Robert Pretlow, a corps manager, said he and the city of Norfolk are designing a project to protect Chesapeake Bay beaches in Willoughby in which they are including calculations of expected sea-level rise.

"Every coastal project has to look at sea-level rise," Pretlow said. "It's just a question of how much you account for it and how you address it."

Scott Harper, (757) 446-2340, scott.harper@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Koch is

about the most ridiculous person I've ever heard address environmental issues. This is all based in fuzzy, unsubstantiated THEORIES that haven't been proven. And just where is Hampton Roads going to get the funds to pay for these levies? Maybe from Obama's stimulus program?

Other countries have cars

Other countries have cars that get 40 MPG because they will buy a car 1/2 the size with 1/3 the power. As for safer how about you buying one of these tin cans and let me run into you with my SUV and we'll see which is safer.

Actually higher mileage vehicles are available here now. No one wants them other than the green wackos who don't value their safety and the safety of their family members. If I worried about gas mileage I would buy a motor scooter.

Uh.....Mr. Pretlow...

In an article talking about levees they state "Robert Pretlow, a corps manager, said he and the city of Norfolk are designing a project to protect Chesapeake Bay beaches in Willoughby in which they are including calculations of expected sea-level rise." Could somebody explain to me how a levee can protect a beach? If the beach is on the 'wet' side of the levee, it will be under water. If the beach is on the 'dry' side of the levee, it will have no water and therefore be a sandbox not a beach. Maybe I am missing something here. If so can somebody explain it to me, please?

Addressing the wrong threat

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimated a potential seal level rise of only 6 to 17 inches over the next 100 years, hardly enough to cause concern. I think we could easily build a 2 foot levee in a century.

A larger problem is subsidence, that is actual sinking of the land relative to sea level, which is occurring far faster along the Mid Atlantic than even the worst predictions of sea level rise and will happen no matter what we do as it is unrelated to sea level rise or climate.

It is that subsidence that is going to be difficult to manage and which will require much higher levees. So, since we're going to be building levees anyway, it would cost us much less to build them 2 feet higher and not wreck our economy in a pointless attempt to limit sea level rise due to global warming.

Get in on the ground floor.

Get in on the ground floor. Buy your Blacksburg oceanfront property now!

Sea Levels Rise and Fall, Have So Since Dawn of Time

Man is so funny. Sea level increases along the East Coast of the US have been documented during the past year or so based on changing circulation patterns and other natural occurances, as noted in a publication available on-line. That is why the water levels at high tide over the last dozen or so months have been noticiable and memorable. Over time, it has well been documented that the level of the seas have risen dramatically and fallen just as fast. Cars, gasses, cow burps, coal combustion are attributed to human influences on the planet. The planet may or may not even recognize those influences on its domain. Forego the notion of dikes and levees - sounds like another reason for needless taxes and overzealous developers promoting expensive ideas on the backs of local and national populations. For lack of a better analogy - it is what it is, we have what we currently have. If the sea will rise, it will take all, the Netherlands be darned - they too will be gone. Small country, no place to built, ohhh look at that vacant mud-flat, dike-it.

Remember Gore?

His "movie" should have been called, "A Convenient Lie". Did the White House, in an effort to start softening people up for Cap & Tax, commission this study by ODU? It sounds like it!

Global Warming is one of the largest hoaxes to be perpetuated on the stupid American voter in some time. Wake up sheep, and do some research - there's plenty of it out there.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=5086

Punitive taxes

It sounds like an increased tax on fuels being promoted for punitive measures to deal with a situation they've not allowed us to work ourselves out of. Those increased taxes wouldn't be used for anything but general budget profits. If anyone should pay a higher penalty for fuel use, it should be the manufacturers and those profiting so much during the "shortage" ruse that we've been put through several times and not something that can be passed on. How many "end of the world as we know it" shortages have we been through now. I'd love to use something else. I've been using what was provided to me. But to tax me as a penalty because I use available fuel and it's all you've provided, that's BS. I'm not going to take it lightly if now, because I might drag a camper around on occasion, that I'm a guilty party in your eyes. Get your stinking transportation system in order, get the alternatives out there. You've had your marching orders for years. Don't put it in my lap. There's still too much greed, profit and "big boy" business in fuel as we know it for any serious changes yet.

While I don't 100% agree

While I don't 100% agree that it is a punitive tax, I do agree that our "leaders" have been sitting on their thumbs for far too long. How is it that other countries have cars getting upwards of 40 or more miles per gallon AND are safer than US cars (they have to be for some of those roadways over there. You are correct that most of our elected officials, democrat and republican alike, will raise costs without offering any alternatives and not really addressing the situation. People talk about the housing bubble causing our decline... I think it's the inability of our "leaders" to lead.

"Here's what MIGHT happen"

Sea levels MIGHT show a corresponding decrease. This isn't science, but conjecture. Just some more alarmist, environmental, political claptrap.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners