©
In the attorney general’s race, Virginians have a choice between a low-key fellow partial to brown suits, and a pugnacious culture warrior more apt to need flameproof gear.
Steve Shannon’s style is the better fit for Virginia. His thoughtful approach would preserve the reputation of the state’s law firm as a source of reliable legal advice. Ken Cuccinelli’s antics would be more entertaining, but drama is something best left to TV shows.
Shannon may be unsteady in the political realm, but he isn’t a newcomer to law enforcement. He served as an assistant prosecutor in Fairfax County, specializing in child pornography cases. He and his wife helped create a chapter of Amber Alert, a national network for rescuing abducted children.
As a Democratic delegate, Shannon has been a centrist who gravitated toward bipartisan compromises on budget and transportation issues. That background will lend him a steady hand as he guides the legislature through what promises to be a tumultuous effort to redraw political districts in 2011.
Shannon says he would partner with local law officials to battle computer crimes. He understands the need to enforce clean water and air regulations. He will work to curb predatory lending by subjecting the industry to a 36 percent cap on interest rates.
Cuccinelli’s experience as a court-appointed attorney for the mentally ill made him a valuable participant in efforts to reform state laws after the Virginia Tech massacre. His intellect could be an asset, but he relies instead on inflammatory appeals.
As a Republican state senator, his limited-government philosophy led him to oppose common-sense safety measures and some crime bills. He voted against allowing cities to enforce traffic laws with red-light cameras and even argued against stricter laws for cockfighting.
He reconciles his anti-government record and his desire to be the state’s lawyer by promising to sue the federal government over environmental and union issues.
“The government’s your client, but you’re responsible to the citizens of the commonwealth,” he said. But would he feel an obligation to all Virginians?
He sponsored a bill to waive unemployment compensation costs for companies that fire workers for not speaking English on the job. The measure would have affected only legal workers because illegal immigrants don’t qualify for unemployment benefits.
Cuccinelli’s views on reproductive rights don’t align with those of most Virginians. He favors legislation that would grant legal rights to fetuses at conception. He has sponsored bills requiring strict regulations that would put most abortion clinics out of business. He voted against a bill stating that contraception is not abortion.
He declined to commit to a nondiscrimination policy against gays and lesbians observed by former Attorney General Bob McDonnell: “ My view is that homosexual acts, not homosexuality, but homosexual acts are wrong. They’re intrinsically wrong. And I think in a natural law based country it’s appropriate to have policies that reflect that. ... They don’t comport with natural law. I happen to think that it represents (to put it politely; I need my thesaurus to be polite) behavior that is not healthy to an individual and in aggregate is not healthy to society.”
To put it politely, Cuccinelli’s election would bring embarrassment to Virginia, instability to the state’s law firm and untold harm to the long list of people who don’t fit his personal definition of morality.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
RACIST!
Ham sandwich on what? WHITE bread!!!? AHA!It comes out every time.'White' bread.Typical racist republican.
Amazing!
The far left Op Ed board endorses a democrat. No need for balance or any real thinking here. Just endorse the democratic candidate. Just a continuation from being in the tank for Obama.
This endorsement, such a SHOCK for VaPilot
The guy who does not even know what the office of Attorney General is gets the endorsement. He was asked to name the divisions and what each does and had NO CLUE. Watch the video as the audience is laughing at how pathetic he is in avoiding the answer. VaPilot smears the Republican but makes no mention of what a total know nothing Shannon is for the office.
http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MGM1MjA1ODdkZWY0YTkxZTA2ZmI1OGM1N2ViZmVmMGE=
This comment is VERY true
At the recent debate of the candidates for Virginia's attorney general, Republican Ken Cuccinelli put one to Democrat Steve Shannon that's probably not that hard: name each division of the attorney general’s office and explain what each does. With a question like that, a candidate is probably hoping his opponent forgets one, or mixes two up, or offers an answer that suggests incomplete knowledge of the duties they seek.
HE KNEW NOTHING
Two Biggoted Editorials
Isn't it interesting that the Republican Party Nominated three pro life individuals but the Virginian Pilot only endorses two democrats - those pro abortion candidates running against Roman Catholics who follow their faith. In the third race where the Republican nominee is a prolife protestant the paper demurrers.
I guess the Pilot can't stomach a Catholic who follows his faith.
As for me I'll happily vote for McDonnell and Cuccinelli
Virginia has come a long way since 1928, even if the Pilot has not.
Yup, you hit the nail on the
Yup, you hit the nail on the head. You know, in those secret Virginian Pilot editorial board meetings, they have a contest to come up with the best ways to up the number of abortions. Winner gets a canned ham!
(sarcasm off, now)
It disheartens me how people on both sides of the political spectrum can be so divisive. There are a lot of us in the middle who are not only fed up with certain things about our government, but also with the partisan bickering and name calling that both sides have stooped to.
No one has all of the answers. Working together, perhaps we can come up with most of them. By bickering, we continue to sink even lower. The sad part is, for many of us, the "working together" part is too hard. For our politicians, it's easier to scream on TV. For many of us, it's simpler to scream on places like this message board.
It would be nice if for one day, we could log on to find thoughtful debate on here instead of socialist-this... or bible-thumper-that. Also, changing candidates names to make fun of them (like NOBama... etc) doesn't really help your argument. It makes you look like a third grader.
And before you label me a socialist, I voted for McCain.
I have to believe that...
Cuccinelli is quite formidable given the vileness of the attacks leveled against him here by the (ahem) always objective, always impartial, always non-partisan Pilot Editorial Board. The sheer, unabashed hatred that is present in this editorial suggests that they fear him as a true candidate for higher office, and will be quite successful in such endeavors. The more they try to villify him, the better and better he will look!
Agree
It's getting so you can judge the quality of a Conservative candidate by the vileness of the attacks leveled against them by the Liberal media. The more afraid they are of the person running against their leftist ideals, the more shrill and personal these attacks get.
Shocker
The staunch republicans who post on these message boards support a candidate who would treat women, legal immigrants, and homosexuals as second class citizens... shocker...
I like the justification!
These "issues" are "devisive" because there are so many people on EACH side! Just say you don't agree with limited government and you are against conservative views on social issues, and be done with it. It's not going to change with ANY election, so we can just get rid of this section every election period. We should call this section "Platitudes". It sounds cool, but it's neither cool nor fresh.
The Pilot
This editorial and the one endorsing Sen. Deeds are reasoned and well supported by the Pilot's moderate tradition.