James Paul Beckstedt said he hasn't missed an election in 50 years, and he's not going to let being in jail break his voting streak.
He's the only inmate at the Virginia Beach Correctional Center registered to vote via absentee ballot this election, according to a list from the city registrar. There are nearly 1,400 people in the jail.
"I want to vote for my candidates," Beckstedt said. "Some elections come down to one vote."
Beckstedt, a 69-year-old husband, father and grandfather, is incarcerated for two misdemeanor charges of disturbing the peace and brandishing a firearm. He's appealing the conviction.
Voting is an important tradition in his family, Beckstedt said. "I vote in every election."
Some inmates have lost their voting rights because of felony convictions, said Chief Deputy Sheriff Dennis Free. Others simply choose not to request a ballot. The application deadline was Tuesday.
The jail does not offer any electoral services, Free said.
"We don't coordinate it at all," he said. "Why would we do that for inmates when that's something we don't even do for our citizens who haven't broken the law?"
Even with the White House up for grabs, just one inmate requested an absentee ballot last November. He didn't turn it in, according to the registrar's list. This year, there's a contentious race for Beach sheriff. Sheriff Paul Lanteigne did not seek re-election.
The candidates, police Capt. John Bell and state Sen. Ken Stolle, said they haven't sent campaign literature to the jail or otherwise appealed to the inmates for their vote.
"We haven't targeted them," Bell said. "I guess that's an opportunity we could have taken advantage of."
"Since I'm going to be in an adversarial role with the inmates, I don't feel that it's in their interest or my interest to ask them for a vote," Stolle said.
But the outcome of Tuesday's election could have a direct impact on the jail's residents. The sheriff runs the correctional center.
If Bell's elected, he said he'll work to provide more education and job-training opportunities for inmates. He also supports increasing the number of nonviolent offenders released on electronic home monitoring or work programs.
If Stolle wins, he said he will coordinate with the jail ministry to increase participation in drug rehabilitation and mental health programs. He opposes expanding early-release programs.
Beckstedt was a Marine, police officer, sheriff deputy and correctional officer before he retired. He said the new sheriff will need to address jail overcrowding, fighting between inmates and food quality. He'd also like to receive the newspaper on time, he added.
Beckstedt said he almost always votes a straight Democratic ticket but broke with tradition this year by supporting Stolle, a Republican.
"He's honorable to his word," he said. "He get things done. He's a doer and he has a tremendous record in the General Assembly."
Bell, a Democrat and a 33-year veteran of the Police Department, has trailed Stolle in fundraising and endorsements. But he's racked up several new endorsements recently, including the Virginia Beach Taxpayer Alliance and the Virginia Beach Police Supervisors' Association.
Beckstedt said he knows his vote might not make a difference, but he wants to have his say anyway.
Politicians "promise everything and never do it," he said. But "I don't miss an election."
Kathy Adams, (757) 222-5155, kathy.adams@pilotonline.com







Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Google
Yahoo

Vote for Capt. Bell
This inmate should vote for Capt. Bell. Stolle's campaign has nothing to offer him. Persons that commit misdeamenors are still eligible to vote and should not have that right violated.
Vote for Capt. John Bell for Virginia Beach Sheriff on November 3rd. For more information on Capt. Bell please visit, www.johnbell4sheriff.com.
Crook
John Bell I bribing inmates by running on letting them out early. I know that e's mailed them - and lied about it to the Pilot.
If inmate want to vote, they could
Eligible inmates that want to get an absentee ballot and vote, can do so. Why should any public official lead them through the process? If a voter is so obtuse that they can't figure out the simple absentee voting process, how can they make an informed decision when casting their ballot? Perhaps that is the point. Some candidates seem to only want ignorant obedience, not an informed and engaged electorate.
I have to wonder....
Those awaiting trial but not yet convicted still can vote, but what makes me wonder is, why are those supporting Stolle (as this inmate is) so opposed to allowing those who have not yet lost their voting rights to exercise them? Would it be so difficult? Probably not but then again, it would require someone to exercise some effort so I can see why municipal employees aren't interested.
Oh, that's right-we want to keep CONTROL of these people and not let the think that they can actually make any choices, who cares if they haven't been convicted because hey, the wrong person never get's arrested, tried and convicted, right?
Close Tag
What about welfare recipients?
Why do we allow welfare recipients voting privileges?
All they do is take from the system. Why should they get any say in how OUR tax dollars get spent?
Next up: the entire EU vote can vote in our elections as part of Obama's New World Order.
This guy is different. All
This guy is different. All he did was "Brandishing a firearm." There is nothing more American than that! Why aren't all the gun fans cheering this guy on?
LOL
In so many cases the politicians and their funders are the ones that need to be behind bars!
Kathy Adams blunder
The writer tells us how many people are in the jail, but not how many people are in jail for misdemeanors. He is not one out of 1400. He is 1 out of whatever number are in for misdemeanors because, as she says, felons lose voting rights. So that 1400 number has no relevance. Maybe she overlooked that.
I don't want to detract from the..
story, which is this guy's being able to vote, which he evidently can. I'm sure the courts would inform him of losing such rights. But I'm curious as to what else may be on his record? It seems odd that he would be jailed after conviction for a misdemeanor, unless he has a history of them, or other more serious convictions. The article says he was a cop, and a correctional officer to boot. Disturbing the peace while brandishing a firearm certainly suggests that he fired that weapon. Anyway of getting all the facts about this particular case and if he does have more on his record? Anyone know?
Thanks...
Misdemeanors aren't enough to lose your vote
Convicted felons are not allowed to vote, which is a good thing. However, many inmates are awaiting trial - they are considered innocent until proven guilty, so they are entitled to their vote. Other inmates are there because they were guilty of misdemeanors. Some misdemeanors (assault, drunk driving) are more serious than others (littering, drunk in public). Should someone be denied a vote because they were convicted of littering? Given that you are NOT gauranteed a trial by jury for misdemeanor charges (usually a judge, who is employed by the state, decides if you are guilty or not), I think you set a dangerous precedent if you were to revoke voting rights for those convicted of misdemeanors.
He doesn't have to vote
ACORN will probably vote for him. He just don't know it yet. Heck they will probably vote in his place and the other 1499 inmates!!
Civic Participation
Convicted felons face both legal and informal barriers to becoming productive citizens at work, responsible citizens in family life, and active citizens in their communities. As criminal punishment has increased in the United States, collateral sanctions such as voting restrictions have taken on new meaning.
Forty-eight states currently maintain some form of restrictions on the voting rights of people with felony convictions. Most states forbid currently incarcerated people from voting, while others extend such bans to parolees and probationers, and still others disenfranchise ex-felons for life (VA & KY).
In a democracy, voting is one of the most fundamental rights of citizenship, connecting us to our community and infusing in us a sense of civic responsibility.
James Bailey, Regional Director
Hampton Roads Missing Voter Project
I disagree
" In a democracy, voting is one of the most fundamental rights of citizenship, connecting us to our community and infusing in us a sense of civic responsibility. "
In our country you have the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. As a convicted felon you have deprived another of citizen of one or more of those rights. Therefore in my opinion you have forfeited your right to vote. It can be argued that their time in prision is their punishment. I would argue that a lifetime ban on voting is another. The solution is simply not to commit a felony and take away the rights of others.
The truth of our form of government
James, you wrote "In a democracy, voting is one of the most fundamental rights of citizenship, connecting us to our community and infusing in us a sense of civic responsibility."
There is one big problem with that statement; according to the United States Constitution, we are NOT a democracy. We are designed to be a Constitutional Republic. Sorry to inform you, but for all these years and after all that education in our public institutions, you were duped. They have been feeding you a lie and you fell for it, hook, line, and sinker.
When a member of our society commits a crime against the very same society of such a grievous nature, they will have to pay for that crime by loosing specified rights and privileges.
Another thing...voting is a privilege, NOT a right.
It sure does help when you read and understand what is contained within the Constitution.
jamesb14543 wrote,
jamesb14543 wrote, "Forty-eight states currently maintain some form of restrictions on the voting rights of people with felony convictions. Most states forbid currently incarcerated people from voting, while others extend such bans to parolees and probationers, and still others disenfranchise ex-felons for life (VA & KY)."
Oh cry me a river. If you are convicted of a felony, then there should be punishment including jail, fines and other things like losing your right to vote. If these aren't things you want to deal with, maybe you should consider that before doing the crime.
I love this story but its
I love this story but its hard for me to take it too seriously. An inmate wants to get in his vote for Sheriff. There must be a punchline in their somewhere.
And….
….another societal liability, such as the electricity stealing trespasser off of Laskin Road, gets his fifteen minutes of fame.
If I’m in the right place at the right time maybe I can get his autograph.
What a shame...
It's hard to believe that only one inmate out of 1,500 in the VBCJ are interested in voting.
1 out of 1400 is better than 0
Whats so hard to believe? 95% are too busy watching MTV or BET, playing cards or eating to spend any time or effort to be voting. The other 5% are actually volunteering to work as trustees in the jail or on the Sheriffs work force out on the roads and might actually be, like some of us, too busy, tired or just don't really care who wins any of the positions. What percent of the people not locked up will actually vote come Tuesday? Hard to believe it won't be 100% right? We will see.