©
By Anita Kumar and Rosalind S. Helderman
The Washington Post
RICHMOND
A scathing legislative audit released Tuesday shows Virginia's outsourcing of a massive $2 billion computer upgrade has been so troubled that core government services have been disrupted but that canceling the contract could cost the state hundreds of millions of dollars.
The problems have affected almost every state agency that uses a computer - a prison was left without inbound phone service for hours, the Virginia State Police in Newport News lost Internet access for more than three days, and computers in DMV offices crashed.
Northrop Grumman, the giant defense company, was awarded the contract, the largest of any kind in Virginia's history, because state officials thought it would provide the best value despite the business's lack of experience managing state computer and communication systems, according to the report by the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission.
Decisions made about the contract "cost the taxpayers a lot of money," House Majority Leader H. Morgan Griffith, R-Salem, said. "In these economic times, we don't have $30 to $40 million to be spending because a giant multinational corporation made mistakes."
Sam Abbate, vice president and program manager for Northrop Grumman, said he was optimistic that changes in the project would lead to improvements in the "unique partnership."
"This is an investment in the commonwealth of a very significant order," he said. "Throughout its life, it will improve services for the citizens of Virginia, without question."
Terminating the contract early could cost the state as much as $400 million and leave no one to manage its computer system.
The state looked for a private company to oversee its computer system in 2003 after a legislative review showed that its technology was out of date and increasingly expensive to maintain. Then-governor Mark Warner, now a U.S. senator, received approval to consolidate computer operations into one agency and overhauled the system to make it more efficient and less costly.
But the report shows that the troubled contract has led to years of finger-pointing, the firing of employees, violations of the state's open meetings law, and crucial decisions made by only a few people.
The report found that a convoluted governance structure in which an independent board - not the governor or the General Assembly - was put in charge of the state's technology agency led to confusion and a lack of oversight. Northrop Grumman was chosen by a 16-member committee that included two board members and state officials.
That board fired Chief Information Officer Lemuel C. Stewart Jr. after he tried to stop a $14 million payment to Northrop Grumman. Two other high-ranking employees at the Virginia Information Technologies Agency were removed by Stewart's successor.
The report recommended that Democratic Gov. Timothy Kaine be placed in charge of the agency.
Problems in the 10-year contract, meant to be a model for the nation, put a stain on a state accustomed to accolades for management and raises questions about how to make outsourcing work for government.
"This is a cautionary tale on what can happen with public-private partnerships," State Sen. Janet Howell, D-Fairfax County, said. "The lesson is be very cautious - and don't be the first state to do it."
Frustrated legislators who serve on the commission heard details of the audit at a meeting Tuesday on Capitol Square. Both chambers of the legislature have begun investigations into the contract.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
The sweetness of good value
The sweetness of good value is long outlasted by bitterness of poor quality. Im sorry but you get what you pay for in almost all cases.
Computers and Government
Now there is a joke. The government attracts mediocre minds with long paper pedigrees in such things as political science, underwater basket weaving, and other such illustrious accomplishments. Oh, and in order to move up in the government they never have made a documented error. This happens one of two ways. First if you never do anything you will never make a mistake. This is the majority. Then there is incompetence, this will get you continuously promoted until you have no responsibilities. These are the bosses. Now you really expect a swarm of self interested barely functional bureaucrats to actually be able to specify, install, implement, and utilize something as technical as a computer system? They can't even build a road in less than 20 years for crying out loud. We will resist discussing the cost of said road. To these people all computers are for is surfing porn on the internets and they can't even get that right? Massive FAIL.
MORE MONEY WASTED
It goes on and on -- it has been proven for months before this money wasting audit that the Northrop Grumman deal is a bad one for the state. Plain, simple and obvious, the Northrop Grumman contract needs to be terminated.
northrop grumman
suing a government contractor is tantamount to peeing up a rope; they are infinitely larger and more powerful than the commonwealth, with a lot more political clout. too bad too, their pay should be related to performance...
Defense Contractors and state computers
"Ashley Colvin of the Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission cited "finger-pointing" and "personality conflicts" between the private company and agency official."
How professional. I'm sure the finger used was the middle one.
State officials need to cancel the contract with NOC post haste and sue for major damages to reimburse everyone on this thread and throughout the commonwealth. They also might look at themselves in the mirror to find the answer as to who should be doing the job instead of third parties.
Mr. Wizard predicts that will not happen.
glad you both have an open
glad you both have an open mind about this. Seems the fault lies with Northrop Grumman, not our illustrious politicians.
Mario
You must be to young to remember those lovely Carter years, what a joke of a president he turned out to be.
This is why....
....we need to elect Creigh Deeds. He's going to continue the success of Mark Warner!!1! Warner was elected on two major issues: fixing Virginia's antiquated tax system, and centralizing common functions through state agencies. The first one, of course, never passed the General Assembly. We have the same screwed up tax system with higher rates and fees. The second, as this contract illustrates, is fledgling. It might have seemed like a good idea at the time, but it hasn't worked. And that Warner was able to win election to the Senate on it is pretty disgusting. Public perception, however, outweighs tangible evidence, which is why Deeds is running on Warner's record (and not mentioning Kaine hardly at all). Notable, too, is the fact that Deeds is no longer running against Bush. I found it amusing that in his Imma-be-like-Warner spots, he failed to mention that Bush was president the entire time Warner was governor. Also, take note of Jody Wagner's ads claiming her orchestration of a balanced budget -- a balanced budget that assumed _four percent economic growth for FY2009_. What lunacy.
Bushes
Since you brought up the Bushes. W is the worst at everything except, unlike his father, he didn't provide WMD to Saddam.
Bush will forever thank us for his war profits.