75°
forecast

Board rejects both offers to sell SPSA

Posted to: News SPSA Virginia

CHESAPEAKE

The board of Hampton Roads' regional trash authority voted Tuesday not to sell the entire agency to a private company, opting instead to unload its most valuable asset.

The Southeastern Public Service Authority board wants to sell its trash-burning power plant in Portsmouth to Wheelabrator Technologies Inc. for $150 million.

The board declined offers from Wheelabrator and another firm, ReEnergy Holdings LLC, to buy all SPSA assets for $240 million.

SPSA executives and board members called Tuesday's vote an important milestone for the trash authority, which plans to use the $150 million from the sale to help pay off $240 million in debt.

SPSA board member Tim Oksman supported the Wheelabrator deal but abstained from voting, saying the decision was being made too quickly.

"The public did not know this resolution was going to be voted on today," said Oksman, who also is Portsmouth's city attorney. "Voting on it gives ammunition to everyone who says SPSA operates in secret and makes arbitrary decisions."

The most recent proposals to buy the entire agency were received a week ago, and the decision was made Tuesday after an hourlong closed session.

Other board members countered by saying that the asset sale has been under discussion for two years. Although Wheelabrator made a bid for all of SPSA, it has said in the past that it preferred to buy only the Portsmouth trash-to-energy plant.

SPSA's sale has been closely scrutinized and studied. The agency paid consultants more than $3 million to help with the deal. That does not include money spent for consultants to quickly review the newest set of proposals and turn around recommendations within a week.

"After two years of incredible conversation, I don't need to answer any more questions," said board member Michael Barrett, who represents Virginia Beach. "I'm ready to act."

Wheelabrator executives have said their deal would reduce trash-disposal fees for residents of the eight member localities, six of which are already paying the highest fees in the nation.

ReEnergy representatives promised even lower rates if the SPSA board chose their proposal, but board members were skeptical.

"If something looks too good to be true, it usually is," Oksman said. "The ReEnergy proposal looks too good to be true."

ReEnergy, a New York firm, is "basically investment bankers trying to get into the solid waste field," Oksman said. "The company is a startup company. It has no track record."

Wheelabrator, based in New Hampshire, is a subsidiary of Waste Management that specializes in operating plants similar to the one SPSA just sold, company representatives said.

"You know you're getting a company that can deliver with Wheelabrator, and you don't know that with ReEnergy," Oksman said.

Officials with some of the member cities praised the deal as part of a long-range plan to rescue SPSA from debt and decrease fees

for residents. The first step was to restructure the debt, and the second was to unload assets to help pay it off.

A new board is set to take over in January, and observers wondered whether the current board would try to make a decision on the proposals before then.

SPSA Executive Director Rowland L. "Bucky" Taylor said Tuesday's decision resolves what happens with the power plant and positions the new board to make decisions about the agency's remaining assets.

Del. John Cosgrove, a frequent critic of SPSA, said he was hoping that the trash authority would wait to make a decision until the new board had a chance to look at the proposals. He said he was concerned that one consultant had reviewed the proposals for the first time this weekend.

"It just seems like a rush," Cosgrove said. "I don't think there's been enough time for anyone in the public to take a look at this."

Mike Saewitz, (757) 222-5207, mike.saewitz@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Public Official?

Barrett, I love how the small and weak gravitate to become "public officials". I guess they need to feel powerful in other ways. This is why public officials do not fight wars...they would get crushed. But thats okay, those who can "do", those who cannot become public officials.

Courage and Intelligence

Yes, of course, and those who lack the courage of their convictions or the intelligence to actually contribute something valuable post anonymously.

Feedback

Thanks for all the feedback. While most has simply been angst and condemnation, it is good to hear from citizens affected by the decision. For those who really just want to condemn, I hope this forum has met that objective for you. The members who set up SPSA, who are responsible for its debt, and who have contracts with SPSA until 2018, are quite pleased with the outcome, having reduced their potential liability by $150,000,000, ensured access to disposal services until 2018, at which time they can negotiate services with any service provider they prefer, likely at much lower rates than they would have been locked into if the all asset sale had been consummated. Regretfully, the Pilot always covered this story in bits and pieces, and in my view, took every opportunity to present their stories with an attituide and without background or balance, which really stirred citizens up. But in the end, a good decision has been made that will serve the members and customers well.

The Emperor has spoken

You are a very self-absorbed person to think you are the czar/emperor of this forum regarding SPSA. No one cares about how you spin. This is why most of us are glad you will no longer be on the BOD of SPSA as of Jan 1. Bye bye.

Which is it?

Oh, I get it. If a public official aspires to inform the citizens and voters as best one can about an important public issue that affects an important service received by a citizen, and to hear back from citizens about their point of view, that is self absorption to you. I guess you would prefer secrecy, silence, and a strict avoidance of the public forum.

Nice straw man

Nice attempt at a straw man argument. It is not an either or. Speaking of secrecy, it was not until recently that SPSA "opened-up". For years it was stupid decisions made in secret.

You are not "informing" as a public official; you are spinning, deflecting, prevaricating, obfuscating etc. Nice try though.

Feel free to take a pass

Well yes, BeachGuy, I get it. When you disagree with what I have said, what I said is by definition spinning. By your definition, any public official who does not spout your particular form of inanity is simply spinning, and if that official is so perverted in his thinking as to agree with you, he is performing a public service. Thank goodness there are citizens out there with the intelligence and the wit to know the difference; those are the citizens to whom I address my comments. You may feel free to ignore any word I say.

Public Official?

I love how the small and weak gravitate to become "public officials". I guess they need to feel powerful in other ways. This is why public officials do not fight wars...they would get crushed. But thats okay, those who can "do", those who cannot become public officials.

too funny

You really do slay me. Your form of reasoning in terms of argumentation is laughable. You love to think of yourself as a "public official"...obviously what little power a SPSA board member enjoys has gone to your head. I looked at your resume. Before your gig as a developer you were a small fish in a big pond at the City of Virginia Beach. City workers tend to be less capable, innovative and entrepreneurial than those of us in the private sector. Never has that been more true than in your case.

So, what would you have done?

It is regretful that you cannot or will not actually say what you would have done given the set of circumstances that the board was required to deal with. I of course have not only outlined what I did, but I have attempted herein to comment on the substance of the decision. Your campaign of personal insults just shows how devoid of knowledge and substance you are on this issue. Perhaps you really know something about something else, but that is yet to be seen.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners