Hampton Roads, VA - 02/08/2010
Few Clouds29°Few Clouds
Forecasts | Doppler Radar
Traffic Cameras & VDOT Alerts

Ex-employees: Blackwater OK'd bribes after deaths

Posted to: Military


By Mark Mazzetti and James Risen

WASHINGTON

Top executives at Blackwater Worldwide authorized secret payments of about $1 million to Iraqi officials that were intended to silence their criticism and buy their support after a September 2007 episode in which Blackwater security guards fatally shot 17 Iraqi civilians in Baghdad, according to former company officials.

Moyock, N.C.-based Blackwater approved the cash payments in December 2007, the officials said, as protests over the deadly shootings in Nisoor Square stoked long-simmering anger inside Iraq about practices by the security company's employees.

American and Iraqi investigators already had concluded that the shootings were unjustified, top Iraqi officials were calling for Black-water's ouster from the country, and company officials feared that Blackwater might be refused an operating license it would need to retain its contracts with the State Department and private clients, worth hundreds of millions of dollars annually.

Four former Blackwater executives said in interviews that Gary Jackson, who was then the company's president, had approved the bribes and that the money was sent from Amman, Jordan, where Blackwater maintains an operations hub, to a top manager in Iraq. The executives, though, said they did not know whether the cash was delivered to Iraqi officials or the identities of the potential recipients.

Blackwater's strategy of buying off the government officials, which would have been illegal under American law, created a deep rift in the company, according to the former executives. They said Cofer Black, who was then the company's vice chairman and a former top CIA and State Department official, learned of the plan from another Blackwater manager while he was in Baghdad discussing compensation for families of the shooting victims with U.S. Embassy officials.

Alarmed about the secret payments, Black cut short his talks and left Iraq. Soon after returning to the United States, he confronted Erik Prince, the company's chairman and founder, who did not dispute that there was a bribery plan, according to a former Blackwater executive familiar with the meeting. Black resigned the next year.

Stacy DeLuke, a company spokeswoman, dismissed the allegations as baseless and said the company would not comment about former employees. Black did not respond to telephone calls and e-mail messages seeking comment.

Reached by phone, Jackson, who resigned as president of Blackwater early this year, criticized The New York Times and said, "I don't care what you write."

The four former Blackwater executives, who had held high-ranking posts at the company, would speak only on condition of anonymity. Two of them said they took part in talks about the payments; the two others said they had been told by several Blackwater officials about the discussions. In agreeing to describe those conversations, the four officials said they were troubled by a pattern of questionable conduct by Blackwater, which had led them to leave the company.

A senior State Department official said U.S. diplomats were not aware of any payoffs to Iraqi officials.

Blackwater continued operating as the prime contractor providing security for the U.S. Embassy in Baghdad until the spring, when the Iraqi government said it would deny the company an operating license. The State Department replaced Blackwater with a rival company in May, but Blackwater still does some work for the department in Iraq on a temporary basis.

Five Blackwater guards involved in the shooting are facing federal manslaughter charges, and their trial is scheduled to start in February in Washington. A sixth guard pleaded guilty in December. Blackwater, now known as Xe Services, has never faced criminal charges in the case, although the Iraqi victims brought a civil lawsuit in federal court against the company and Prince.

Separately, a federal grand jury in North Carolina has been conducting a lengthy investigation into the company. One of the former executives said he had told federal prosecutors there about the plan to pay Iraqi officials to drop their inquiries into the Nisoor Square case. If Blackwater followed through, the company or its officials could face charges of obstruction of justice and violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, which bans bribes to foreign officials.

Officials at the U.S. attorney's office in Raleigh declined to comment on their investigation, and it is not clear whether the payment scheme is a focus of the grand jury.

Federal prosecutors in North Carolina have interviewed a number of former Blackwater employees about a variety of issues, including allegations of weapons smuggling, according to several former Blackwater workers who say they have testified before the grand jury or been interviewed by prosecutors, as well as lawyers familiar with the matter. Two former employees have pleaded guilty to weapons charges and are believed to be cooperating with prosecutors.



ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here and for following agreed-upon rules of civility. Comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its Web sites. Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the "Report Violation" link below the comment.

Good Riddance

I hope this is the beginning of the end for the Crusader Prince and his band of mercenary gun-slingers. Blackwater (now Xe) will need to change its motto from "The Only Good Muslim is a Dead Muslim" to "If you can't kill 'em, bribe 'em."

Virginia Pilot, when are you going to accept some simple facts?

Blackwater is dead, they are now Xe. They have been Xe for some time.
Xe is not the military. There actions should not be found on the same page as the military in this paper. Xe is hired by the state department. Tie them to the people who hired them.
The way the pilot handles Xe indicates that their desire is to discredit the work our military is doing. Look at the local military news section. 10 items, 3 about Xe which are negative and talk about bribery, cheating, murder.
1 story about the Vietnam vet trying to improve the morals of our country. To find negatives for our military, the pilot has to bring Xe into the picture, which is not part of our military, so there bias can be maintained. Heaven forbid the Vietnam vet story was the only story to run today, and it has a positive slant. The Pilot had to "balance" the good with 2 Xe negative non-military stories. Pilot, why do you discredit our military in this shameless fashion?

Agree and Disagree

I agree that stories about Blackwater/Xe should not be placed in the Military Section of the Pilot. They are not the military although I think Blackwater officials would like you to think they are. I don't know where you'd put these stories however, maybe the local section? The Business section? I'd even rather see them in the sports section than in the military section.

Where I disagree with you is in calling them Xe. Yes, I know they officially changed their name and all that. But I believe that the name change is an effort to distance the company from its sordid past (and present). I don't think they should be afforded that easy way out. Even if the media calls them Xe, I still think they should continue to refer to them as Blackwater. Maybe they can refer to them as "Xe (the artist formerly known as Blackwater)"?

well you have a point

but if the pilot would call them Xe for the year they have been Xe, folks would already have seen past the name change. From a journalistic POV, they should report the name change. If the pilot is willing to twist Xe, what else would they feel compelled to twist? Is that journalism, or tabloid reporting?
I have called the smell of a horse manure pile, "the sweet aromatic smell of the country", yet the little one I baby sit told me it smelled like poop.
North Carolina has to accept that Xe is in our state. If the pilot wishes to report on them, than putting them as "local" or "north Carolina" is acceptable as Blackwater falls into both.

Is there any journalistic truism by attributing Xe, or blackwater in the realm of military? I am not a journalist, yet I know it is wrong to attribute the actions of one group with another. Water is not dry land. Xe is not the military.

Good Point

But the point I was trying to make is that almost all of the alleged atrocities/wrongdoings done by the company have been done under the name of Blackwater. Changing their name to "Xe" is simply a way to disassociate the company from its past and its reputation. I, for one, do not believe that Blackwater deserves that luxury. Their reputation, in my opinion, is well-deserved and they should receive no pass from the media on their past actions. Everyone knows what Blackwater means. Very few know what "Xe" is (which of course is the idea if you are Blackwater).

By the way, I don't think this particular article is on the Pilot though. Looks like it was picked up from the New York Times.

Is this any surprise?

Does this really surprise anyone? Blackwater trying to bribe off Iraqi officials is just par for the course for corporations and even the U.S. government. I think it would be more surprising to find out this didn't happen.

Truth or Accusations?

As Marty Peretz recently observed , “Ours is an age when the moral authority of accusers is at its height. Also the moral authority of accusations. There was a time when accusations had to be proven. That requirement has long since passed.”

Here are the key qualifications, which are scattered through the piece:
1. “The executives, though, said they did not know whether the cash was delivered to Iraqi officials or the identities of the potential recipients.” So nobody really knows if any money was paid, or to whom. Shouldn't four ex-”executives” of Blackwater with intimate knowledge of the bribery also know who was supposed to get the money?
2. “The former Blackwater executives said it was not clear who proposed paying off Iraqi officials.” So they do not know who was supposed get the money and they don’t know who at the company was behind the project.
3. “Two of [the Blackwater officials] said they took part in talks about the payments; the two others said they had been told by several Blackwater officials about the discussions.” Basically, the Times really only has two officials making the allegation.
4. “A senior State Department official said that

I had no idea so many ignorant people existed

The US government set the precedent for 'bribery'. We bribe militia leaders, local governors, politicians, etc with cash payments, booze, women, & anything you can think of to NOT shoot at our troops (or whatever else they want). This is not new in foreign wars. I figure if the US government can do it in a war zone then so can its hands (ie, the mercenaries).

Blackwater ...

... outsourcing gone wild.

Serious Stench

It does not surprise me that the world's most lucative mercenary force has committed serious crimes. When they are responsible for decisions on life and death, contractor employees should not be above the law or shielded by government officials.

How many more scandals do you need held up to your face before use only our military professionals and not hired guns accountable only to profit?

They have no shame.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More Military Stories

More articles from: Military rss feed