©
Local governments have been singing the budget blues for two years, but their song is about to take on a much more somber tone - "the sign of the weary," as Bob Dylan's "Hard Times" goes.
Virginia Beach's revenue forecast for its 2010-11 budget shows its savings accounts depleted, home values down another 5 percent, taxes on hotels and restaurants reflecting the recession. Interest income from the city's investments has dropped 45 percent. The state isn't providing money to fix potholes or build roads. And schools, which make up half the city's budget, are expecting $15 million less from the state next year.
The result: The Beach at this point is $84.4 million short of its projected $1.73 billion of city and school expenses.
Increased taxes can't come close to making up the difference. That's even with budget director Catheryn Whitesell's assumptions that city and school employees won't get raises next year, that no more money will go to building projects such as an animal shelter and a recreation center, and that Virginia Beach will absorb the increase in payments to its employee retirement system - all assumptions that will be up to the City Council to determine.
Her prediction means Beach leaders will spend the next few months deciding what services are so important that they must be held harmless and what expenses must wait for a stronger economy. Where the council places its priorities will say a lot about what Virginia Beach will look like.
The Beach has long been known as a good place to raise a family, a suburb of safe neighborhoods and, thanks to the military and tourism, a city with low unemployment. Historically, the City Council has set aside money for open space, invested in parks and recreation centers, provided money to ensure good schools, offered stability and good benefits to its employees.
Last year, as the stock market plummeted and businesses closed, the city banked on the economy improving in 2009, so it used $45 million from its savings accounts to shore up the budget. Plenty of people are second-guessing that decision now.
The City Council also invested in the Beach's future, spending $10 million to control the 10-mile rail corridor between Norfolk and the Oceanfront. The purchase is likely to be used eventually to extend mass transit through Virginia Beach, but even if it isn't, the city will control that vital space.
Now the council faces more immediate and long-lasting decisions on what's fair and what's critical. No department, no service, no employee can be left out of the discussion. Given the condition of the budget, the council must revisit literally every aspect of its financial house - from tax rates to salaries - line by line.
Should, for example, the city assume greater responsibility for fixing potholes and repaving roads because the state has shirked that responsibility? Should the owner of a $100,000 fishing boat be exempt from personal property taxes while the owner of an $8,000 car pays nearly $300? Should Virginia Beach be in the business of operating recreation centers that compete with private gyms? Should condo owners - but not single-family dwellers - have to pay for garbage pickup?
What about the amenities that have set Virginia Beach apart: its parks and recreation centers, museums and cultural events?
In the next four months, city officials will be mapping out a strategy to get through the recession and put Virginia Beach in a position to thrive. They're asking citizens for help. The next opportunity is 7 p.m. Dec. 3 at Kellam High School.
Virginia Beach can continue singing "Hard Times," or it can make the hard decisions on what can be postponed, what needs immediate attention and what is critical if Virginia Beach is to remain a vital, sustainable city in 25 years.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
City's Plan on "Revenue Neutral" Is Bogus -
Raising tax rates to generate the same level of revenues in 2010 is another misleading proposal from the City's theatrical playbook. For example city leaders unashamedly claim we can increase the tax rate from 89c to 93.2 cent (4.2 cents) and raise $21.6 million and it won't cost you anything. However, the City Assessor claimed that the average assessment will drop by 5% in FY2010. That represented $21.5 million in lower revenues and will provide a return of $21.5 million to residents or about an average $150 lowered tax bill to 139,000 homeowners. Not great relief for the tax hits home owners have received when a assessments soared from $16.8 billion to $47.4 billion but a start. The City does not want to get into the nitty gritty so why mention the financial implications of a lowered assessment that will be replaced by the magic of "revenue neutral". How else can this City operate without confusing citizens to make it sound like a level playing field. This is nothing more than a 3 card monte scheme. . .now you see it now you don't
delusional
"the recession is over"
Some perspective please
Every time the bitter citizens like those earlier in this forum post they ignore the fact that we have the level of service that we want. That is, we, the citizens, advocate for the quality and quanity of public services, and the City provides them. This year will be a challenge, and some retrenchment will occur, but the recession is over and I expect recovery as well. Our assessments are down, so there is room to raise the rate a bit so we pay about the same real estate tax as last year. For me, same for the personal property tax rate. Use a bit of the rainy day fund as well. The schools will not be spared, and should do their share of cost cutting. Of most importance is not to curtail those investments that will increase the commercial tax base and bring in jobs and new revenue. Revenue will soon start to increase again, and we will continue to enjoy low tax rates, excellent services, and a prognosis for future quality growth and prosperity.
Kool-Aid drinker
You are more naive in your understanding of economics than I thought. The only reason that there has been any "growth" has been due to the bogus stimulus, which "created" growth only in the public sector. Private sector is still wallowing as are private sector jobs. Here is what we are looking at in terms of the future: at best a double-dip recession, very slow job recovery, large uptick in interest rates and inflation. We cannot keep printing money and not expect inflation to go through the roof. The Fed Reserve's monetary policy of keeping interest rates artificially low is just delaying the inevitable. Once again you show that you no NOTHING about economics or finance. Your love for private-public partnerships and quid pro quos vis-a-vis city council approval on your projects is the ONLY way your company survives
Still pushing the failed scams of the past...
Poor developer Barrett & pals. The bubble burst and reality has set in - he and his pals are desperate to cling to their foolish scams of endless borrow & spend "investments". They continue to promote the abuse of government and advocate for more failed "public-private partnerships" that subsidize favored business interests and pay back political contributors. Sorry Mike, we really can't afford your corruption anymore. In case you failed to notice, the party is over.
more goofy spending
And how about those very pretty nice walk ways at Stumpy Lake and Lake Holly! I drove by Stumpy Lake three times this week, every day some guy was in the same place handpainting (staining) the rails on this lovely walkway- Who is that walkway for?
And We'd Expect Them to Listen Now Because......
The community has tried to tell the CC to pull the reins in on spending and take care of the "needs" before the "wants." But they didn't listen. Why would anyone think they'd listen now? The cow is already out of the barn. VB dodged much of the damage felt by others during the dot.com bust and thought they were safe from the current economic crisis.
Wrong....because we have over inflated housing costs and low wages run by schzophrenic city leaders who don't know whether they want to be a tourist mecca or an urban center...with only developers reaping the benefits.
VB has a reputation, even at the federal level, of being arrogant and hard to deal with...so why would plain ol' citizens think they'd receive any more respect?
BTW...the schools budget is not "half of the city's budget." It is 51.3% of 7 revenue streams. The school's share of the city's budget is closer to 1/3 of the total city budget than 1/2.
Cutting spend?
Neither city council or city staff has the experience to cut expenses; they never really have had to seriously approach a problem like this. Escalating property taxes over the past 8 years have given the city plenty of of play money for the discretionary (lol) spending. You can bet that their best approach is to increase taxes. Wanna bet!
Massive increases in taxes - city drunk on borrow and spend
Good grief! The City of Virginia Beach reaped MASSIVE increases in property taxes since 2001 with a modest growth in population, a DECLINE in school-aged kids, and very modest annual rates of inflation (less than 3%). The City has plenty of money to cover its required services. What we have is a city leadership team that is addicted to spending and addicted to BORROWING. What we have is a "budget" filled with debt service on speculative "economic development" scams that have failed to produce the promised return on investment to taxpayers. What we have are foolish scams like expensive Light Rail TOD DEVELOPMENT promises and $300M Convention Centers, taxpayer subsidized "Town Centers", and an endless list of "projects" that fail perform as promised. What we have are $60M Performing Arts Centers and multimillion dollar TPC Golf Courses instead of taking care of business or saving millions in "surpluses" that City Council spent. NOW that they have maxed out the credit cards, bought the luxuries on credit, and the over valued homes have adjusted, suddenly they can't afford their "budget"?
Please explain
Will someone please explain to me how we can afford the train?
(Mike Barrett to chime in-3...2...1)