Turning trash into eco-friendly treasure

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

Seven years after Camden County officials endorsed a controversial deal that would have made their rural community home to North Carolina's largest landfill, they're pursuing a completely different vision for property near the Chesapeake border.

Camden, one of the state's poorest counties, is in the early stages of developing plans for an eco-friendly corridor along U.S. 17, just south of the Virginia line. Earlier this year, the county won a $2 million grant to run water and sewer lines to the area to serve the new development.

The landfill - proposed by Black Bear Disposal, a subsidiary of Waste Industries - drew intense opposition from officials in Chesapeake as well as residents in Virginia and northeast North Carolina.

Critics argued that the project, which would have generated an estimated $1 million or more annually for Camden, would pose a serious threat to public health and the environment. Chesapeake officials pointed to the potential effects on the city's water supply and the Northwest River.

The proposal hit a wall in 2007 when state Sen. Marc Basnight shepherded a measure through the North Carolina General Assembly barring landfills near state and national parks. The Black Bear project would have been close to the Great Dismal Swamp.

Now, as The Pilot's Jeff Hampton recently reported, the area is drawing attention of a different sort. Two groups are hoping to build eco-parks tailored to serve businesses engaged in recycling, alternative energy and similar ventures.

One of the projects, proposed by a partnership that includes Norfolk's Gordon Dillon and Vincent J. Mastracco Jr., would be on 134 acres owned by Black Bear. The partnership estimates they can attract businesses to the park that will generate more than 500 jobs.

A mile south on U.S. 17, Camden officials also plan to build a 100-acre, environmentally friendly park. Green ECO Institute Inc., based in Elizabeth City, intends to lease 10 acres from the county and construct several buildings to serve as incubators for start-up companies.

Peter Thomson, one of the principals in the project, said it would be similar to eco-parks developed in the United States and Europe. The goal is for at least some companies to grow and relocate to roomier quarters in the region.

Sen. Basnight, who helped secure the utility-line grant from an economic development fund established with tobacco settlement dollars, has described the eco-friendly corridor as similar to the public-private partnership that created the Research Triangle in the Raleigh-Durham area decades ago.

That's an ambitious vision, and Camden is far from realizing it. But it's an encouraging shift in plans for land along the Virginia-North Carolina border - a shift that could prove beneficial to the environment and to the region's economy.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

I wonder how long it will be before

Someone puts an "eco friendly" sewage treatment plant there. This is just another lie in the thousands of lies already told to the public. Calling and industrial park "eco friendly" doesn't mean it's not an industrial park. It's a scam. They are using these terms in an attempt to villify anyone who would oppose it.

Eco friendly. Ha. The developer's last name is probably Eco.

This is along time coming

This is along time coming and well-worth it.

Look again.

I am having trouble understanding how you can say that this development could be eco friendly. Getting government grants to extend water and sewer lines to increase sprawl is the opposite of eco friendly. You say...."But it's an encouraging shift in plans for land along the Virginia-North Carolina border - a shift that could prove beneficial to the environment and to the region's economy." Frankly, how can you conclude that this will be good for the environment? Won't such development create more storm water run off into the North West River basin, the exact reason that Chesapeake opposed the sanitary landfill, which is required to be developed and built so their is no water penetration and no run off from the landfill? Whoever wrote this editorial needs to step back and look at the facts.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox