73°
forecast

Virginia universities tilt toward nonresidents for higher tuition

Posted to: Education News Williamsburg - James City

By Daniel de Vise

Raechel Hanson toiled through high school to build an academic transcript strong enough for admission to the College of William and Mary, the storied "public Ivy" in Williamsburg. She maintained a 3.9 grade-point average, played flute in the band, presided over the Spanish club and amassed more than 100 hours of community service.

It wasn't enough. She wound up 20 miles away at a less-selective state school, Christopher Newport University.

This was a particularly tough year for Virginians seeking entry to William and Mary and several other prestigious public universities because of machinations in the admissions cycle that favored applicants from outside the state.

"I spent most of my life working toward getting in at William and Mary," said Hanson, 19, of Winchester. "I thought I was of the caliber of students who would get in."

Many of the nation's top public universities accepted nonresident students in greater numbers this year, hoping to increase - or at least sustain - a pool of incoming freshmen who pay two or three times the tuition charged to locals. At some schools, the push for nonresidents has made it harder for residents to get in.

Public universities with the cachet to attract out-of-state students have courted them for decades. But universities are looking harder at nonresident students and their tuition dollars during the recession as other revenue sources dwindle.

State funding has eroded by 10 percent in Maryland and by 20 percent or more in Virginia since the start of the downturn, accelerating a long-term nationwide decline in government support for higher education. Out-of-state students generally pay the full cost of their education, effectively subsidizing their in-state classmates.

Since pre-recession 2007, the share of nonresident students in the freshman class has grown considerably at several flagship universities: from 34 to 37 percent at William and Mary; from 19 to 25 percent at the University of Washington; from 43 to 49 percent at the University of Iowa; and from 35 to 44 percent at Penn State.

"It's a matter of fiscal realities," said Mark Emmert, president of the University of Washington. "Public universities survive on a combination of tuition revenue and state financial support. If one goes down, the other has to go up if you want to maintain your capacity."

A broader group of colleges, including the universities of Virginia and Maryland and flagship schools in Michigan, North Carolina and Minnesota, offered admission to more nonresident students this year than last year simply to shore up their numbers. The downturn made it harder for out-of-state students to pay the nonresident surcharge, so schools had to admit more nonresidents than they planned to enroll.

William and Mary accepted more non-Virginians than Virginians this spring for the first time in recent years.

The college has become progressively more selective for state residents: A Virginia high school senior who applied to William and Mary four years ago had a 47 percent chance of getting in. This year's admit rate was 39 percent. For non-Virginians, in the same span, the admission rate has risen from 22 to 30 percent.

U.Va. accepted more out-of-state students this year than last year and slightly fewer Virginians. The admission rate for Virginians has fallen from 49 percent in 2005 to 45 percent this year. But school officials note that the admit rate has declined for nonresidents, too.

Local university officials say any fluctuation in the admissions mix is purely temporary. A state cap forbids Virginia universities from raising their share of nonresident students above historic levels; at U.Va. and William and Mary, residents outnumber nonresidents roughly 2 to 1.

"We certainly understand our role as a state institution," said Brian Whitson, spokesman for William and Mary.

Schools are pushing those limits, officials say, because they cannot afford to lose nonresident tuition dollars. At William and Mary, two-thirds of tuition revenue, $58 million, comes from nonresidents who pay $30,964 in tuition and fees, compared with $10,800 for residents.

The competition between in-state and out-of-state students has hardened into a political cause in some states as the growing applicant pool makes it tougher for everyone to get in. Parents wistfully recall an era when seemingly anyone with good grades and high SAT scores could gain entry to top state schools.

"It's just not good enough anymore to have really good grades, really good SATs, really good sports, really good kid," Denise Miller said. Her son Billy was rejected by U.Va. despite a transcript that included high grades, Advanced Placement credits, Chinese, diving and squash. He's at his second choice, Virginia Tech.

In Virginia's recent gubernatorial contest, both candidates proposed plans to make more room for Virginians in state schools. Republican Gov.-elect Bob McDonnell campaigned on a plan to reduce the share of out-of-state students not by limiting their numbers but by increasing overall seats in state universities by 119,000 over the next 15 years.

"They're literally kicking kids across the borders to other states," said state Del. Timothy Hugo, R-Fairfax. He is the latest of several state lawmakers to push for tougher limits on out-of-state students.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

For Clarification

1. In-state students cannot and should not be guaranteed admission to such high-caliber institutions as W&M and UVa. Just because you've got good grades doesn't mean that you're a competitive candidate.
2. To suggest that any institution bases its admissions decisions on the basis of tuition is insulting to the out-of-state students who rightfully earned their place at Virginia institutions.
3. Though state funding may continue to erode, causing Virginia institutions to struggle much more than they deserve given their incredibly high quality, schools like W&M will ALWAYS continue to accept at least 2/3 incoming students into its freshman class each year.
4. The College has become more selective in large part due to a steady increase in applications while maintaining the size of the incoming freshman class. The number of applicants cannot be controlled by W&M, but does speak volumes about the high demand for admission at this institution.
5. This article is HIGHLY offensive to schools like Virginia Tech and CNU when it implies that those schools are "second choice" or "less selective."

As a current senior at

As a current senior at William and Mary I have learned that out of state students and in-state students are not considered in the same pool. In order to receive the little state funding the school gets and its title of a public university the College MUST ALWAYS, by law, accept at least 2/3 of its students from Virginia. This means that Virginian students are not directly competing with those from New York, North Carolina, etc. they are merely competing with each other. That being said, it is easier to be accepted from within Virginia due to the 2/3 to 1/3 proportion. As argued, this means that there was not some non-Virginian student taking this girl's spot at the College, there was another Virginian student doing so.
I am personally offended by the suggestion that Virginia higher education institutions are accepting out of state students principally for their increase in tuition revenue. In fact, these students are being accepted for a variety of reasons, including impressive credentials, diversity, expected contribution to the college, etc. The article suggests that these students bear the full brunt of their tuition AND subsidize their in state peers, when in fact out of

Excuses

As a student at William and Mary (who has lived in Virginia for the past 15 years), articles like this really offend me. I really tried to find a nicer way to say this, but I can't think of one. The reason these kids didn't get in is that they are not that impressive as applicants. A 3.9GPA in high school is really low here, especially if you didn't have ALL AP or IB credits. Very few students here came in without having taken all AP or IB classes for at least the last two years of high school. All of us were in tons of clubs in high school, we graduated at the top of our classes with NHS hoods. The reason you didn't get in is not because some out of state kid took your spot. It's because you didn't measure up.

Getting the full facts

I am really disheartened by this biased reporting. When did W&M become the scapegoat for something that all public schools have been forced to do in this tough financial time? Bellow is a letter that has recently been sent to the students of W&M by our current president. As you can see W&M is in a serious financial crisis right now, just like everyone else in the US. W&M is significantly underfunded from the state, especially in comparison with other states.

If slightly above average students who do not have incredible extra-curricular activities want guaranteed admittance into excellent state schools like William and Mary they should write to their representatives and/or vote on paying higher taxes so colleges like William and Mary will not be forced to make tough decisions about admitting kids who will simply be more advantageous to the school.

“Dear William & Mary Community,

Today the Board of Visitors approved a plan to re-balance William & Mary’s budget for the current fiscal year. This was required because of a substantial September cut in state funding for both the main campus … we must revise the main campus budget for 2009/10 because of a 15% ($6.2 milli

Why bother?

I don't understand why parents go through all the pain of getting their kid set up for college. Twelve years of PTA's and pumping for grades, then struggling to pay huge amounts of money for four+ years... just so their offspring can get a BS degree that qualifies them for a 15 dollar an hour job in a technical help desk. Once upon a time, a four year degree meant something. Now it's a fancy certificate for an overpriced VoTech education.

$15 an hour?!?

I got $10 an hour doing spreadsheets with my fancy ODU Finance degree. Eventually I parlayed it in to accounting, and now, about 6 years later, Im just barely making more then $15 an hour.

I think, $15 an hour is probably unrealistically high for most of the areas graduates.

if your kids

can't get in why pay your taxes. Just another example of "government" run amuck!! Guess this is change getting closer and closer. Ain't life grand??

Tuition Raise

How cheap and tacky. Virginia has the best schools in America and they pull a stunt such as this......How cheap and tacky!

The good news is that

The good news is that Virginia offers a lot of other excellent choices for public higher education than just WM, UVA & VT. Heck before Michael Vick, Va. Tech was easier to get into than ODU/GMU are now. Many bright in-state students are now discovering good schools like VCU, ODU, GMU, CNU, JMU etc. As these schools get better and brighter incoming freshmen, the quality and reputations of these institutions will skyrocket. As an example, its not coincidence that as WM & UVA have taken more and more out of state freshmen, ODU's on campus population has exploded, admissions standards increased tremendously, and the quality of education risen to national prominence. Many in state kids that would have gone to UVA/WM in the past are now choosing ODU or others. It may not have been their first choice, but a rising tide lifts all boats, and these students are still receiving a quality education and good college experience for a value. And as a result, they are helping to make ODU and all of our state universities schools we can be proud of.

Just plain wrong

How wrong is it when in state kids whose parents have paid a tn of taxes towards education only to have their child bumped out by another state's child. I'm not saying close the borders, but there should be more leeway towards an in-state kid and more difficult (in addition to expensive) for out of state. If their state's schoold arent; good enough, those parents should be complaining to get that changed vice running to another state. Plus those kids might remain in those states and apply their new wares there to help thier own economy.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Education rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox