©
By David G. Savage
Chicago Tribune
WASHINGTON
Ruling in a case that strained U.S.-Iraqi relations, a federal judge in Washington on Thursday dismissed all criminal charges against five Blackwater security guards who were accused of firing machine guns at unarmed civilians driving through a Baghdad traffic circle, killing 17 of them and injuring 20 more.
The judge did not rule on the substance of the charges against the private security guards but instead decided that prosecutors had wrongly relied on what the guards told State Department investigators shortly after the incident. As government contractors, the employees of Moyock, N.C.-based Blackwater were required to speak to an investigator after a shooting.
U.S. District Judge Ricardo Urbina said the use of these statements violated the defendants’ rights against compelled self-incrimination.
“In their zeal to bring charges against the defendants … the government used (their) compelled statements to guide its charging decisions … and ultimately, to obtain the indictment in this case,” the judge wrote in a 90-page opinion. “We’re disappointed by the decision,” said Dean Boyd, a Justice Department spokesman. “We’re still in the process of reviewing the opinion and considering our options.”
Because the indictment was thrown out on legal grounds, the government could bring an appeal.
The five guards in the case were Paul Slough of Keller, Texas; Nicholas Slatten of Sparta, Tenn.; Evan Liberty of Rochester, N.H.; Dustin Heard of Maryville, Tenn.; and Donald Ball of West Valley City, Utah. Each had been charged with multiple counts of voluntary manslaughter and firearms violations.
A sixth guard, Jeremy Ridgeway, pleaded guilty to one count of voluntary manslaughter and helped authorities confirm the details of the incident.
The guards maintained that they fired their weapons in response to an attack by insurgents. But according to the U.S. prosecutors and an Iraqi government investigation, the shooting was unprovoked.
The September 2007 shooting in Baghdad’s Nisoor Square put a spotlight on the role of private security guards in the Iraq war . Blackwater guards were hired to provide protection for U.S. officials, but they were not bound by all the same rules and procedures as the U.S. military.
Before the 2007 incident, Blackwater’s guards had been involved in other shootings, and they were faulted for firing at unarmed civilians.
The news of the dismissal came to Baghdad late Thursday night. One survivor, a cab driver named Bara Sadoun Ismail, who was shot twice in the incident, refused to accept the news.
“I don’t think it’s true that these five people have been released for lack of evidence,” he said. “The American justice (system) works. There is just delay.”
The five guards who were in Nisoor Square on Sept. 16, 2007, said they were responding to reports of an explosive device detonating nearby as a convoy of U.S. officials approached the area.
The guards “were defending themselves and their comrades who were being shot at and receiving fire from Iraqis they believed to be enemy insurgents,” defense attorney David Schertler said at the time of their indictment in December 2007.
Government prosecutors disputed that the guards were returning fire.
“None of the victims of this shooting was armed,” Jeffrey Taylor, the U.S. attorney in Washington, said when he announced the indictment. “None was an insurgent.”
The five guards were not charged with murder but instead with voluntary manslaughter and firearms offenses.
The judge convened a hearing in October to determine whether the indictment was “tainted” by the statements the guards had given during their initial interviews. The hearing stretched over three weeks.
He concluded Thursday that the “defendants’ compelled statements pervaded nearly every aspect of the government’s investigation and prosecution.” For that reason, the entire indictment must be dismissed, he said.
Separately, Blackwater and its founder, Erik Prince, have been sued in federal court by the victims of the Nisoor Square shootings.
According to the Center for Constitutional Rights, which brought the lawsuit, the complaint alleged that Blackwater and Prince “created and fostered a culture of lawlessness among its employees, encouraging them to act in the company’s financial interests at the expense of innocent human life.”
Blackwater, which has changed its name to Xe Services, is seeking to have the lawsuit dismissed.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


Blackwater in Afghanistan
Of the people killed in Afghanistan yesterday, 2 were blackwater and they are already making statements on how they will avenge their death. I think thats what the Taliban is counting on. Distracting us from our plan and tying us up in side battles. The guy who did this is dead. Instead of talking and making public statements, they should just do it, but I have a feeling they will hit civilians who they believe were the culprits. The taliban know how to manipulate our intelligence and feed mis- information to achieve their goals. The afghans have their own internal power struggle, in fact they had this all along.
now that our country tries terrorist in civil courts, shouldn't
these guys also be tried in the civilian court where the alleged incident occurred? From the Iraqi POV, wouldn't the alleged killing of 17 civilians be an act of terror or even murder? If we are going to try military actions not as war crimes, but civilian actions in civilian courts, then we have to reciprocate and turn over anyone the Iraqi civilian courts feel they have a strong case to be tried in their court system. In Iraq, this action may not be looked at as protection forces being attacked, but potentially as 5 guys killing 17 and injuring 20. This administration has opened that door for Iraq. What is Clinton and Obama going to do, as a country if Iraq asks for those guys to stand trial for terrorism/murder in the jurisdiction the alleged act occurred vice in a US civil court that appears to be biased? From the Iraqi peoples point of view, this judges action has to be extremely confusing to down right disgusting. When the Iraqi people start to ask stand trial in the courts the act occurred like other alleged terrorists/murders are doing in NYC, what will Clinton and Obama do with/for these guys based on the presidence being set in NYC?
?
Does this change the fact, that 17 people were killed, unarmed civilians, and 20 more people were hit with bullets fired by employees of Blackwater? Does someone know how many people from Blackwater were hit by bullets in this exchange of fire? Does anyone find it odd, that no one from Blackwater was hit by a single bullet and that one of the Blackwater guards pleaded guilty? Johhny Cochran couldn't have done a better job than the Blackwater lawyers. By the way, the company changed its name again. This month it is no longer called Xe, and the former owner, little Richie Rich, Erik Prince, picked up his billions and left.
No, not at all. The charges
No, not at all. The charges are dismissed. So are you ready to try to answer questions with more questions again? What reckless speculation you have engaged in. It is apparent you have a grudge and are biased.
I agree but procedure needs to be followed
Johnny Cochran had it right when he said "who will police the police". A drunk blackwater guy shot an innocent Iraqi and he was swept under the rug as well. I am with you that this organization overcharges the taxpayer and puts us in greater danger by creating more radicals than they kill. But apparently, in this instance, the evidence collected by what amounts to lazy government workers was superficial and circumstantial at best. It seems the only people in awe of blackwater are southerners and not the people they are supposed to be stopping. Blackwaters business model is hire a guy for $300K and charge the US taxpayer $1M and the rest is profit. I think it would be better to hire ex Indian army guys who have actually have a track record of winning. Cow worshipoing Indian defeated pakistan 3x since 1947 even though pak. was getting US support, fighters, tanks etc. The Indians would charge a fraction, look like the locals and be much more effective and also have the brains and humanity not to kill civilians. Our nation is not going to fall from invasion but from frivolous spending.
No Accountability
When the government hires paid mercenaries to do their killing, they become accomplices to their crimes. Of course the government engineered their case to ensure that the mercenaries get off.
A good outcome
I agree with this outcome. I do not condone wanton killing by us or others but in that time, in that area, or in any war zone, you don't always have time to sort out the enemy from the civilians because you are the only one distinguished by a uniform and you don't shoot until you are shot at or otherwise endangered. We shouldn't send our troops over there to be sitting ducks. These men felt endangered and fired on those who they perceived to be the enemy. We compensated those who were killed and injured. It was unfortunate circumstances for everyone involved. Obviously, we hope that these situations can be avoided.
How Exactly..
Do you compensate a dead person? These were innocent civilians going about their day in their own country-not ours. And we attacked their country on false grounds in a "pre-emptive" mode. Turn it around and would you make the same comments if perhaps Russia attacked the US (pre-emptively) and occupied our country and they hired private mercenaries to patrol the streets who had complete autonomy and complete exemption from the rule of law. Now say the civilians were your family and friends and neighbors. Would you feel the same? Iraq was and is a mess that could have been avoided. For these actions we created even more who hate the US. Our job became more difficult not easier as a result of the war in Iraq. Hopefully as a country we have finally learned the bitter lesson in getting involved in foreign wars of choice.
YEAH
I am so happy to finally hear some good news for Xe. I think they have been treated terribly. Enjoy 2010!
For the guard who pleaded guilty, I hope they let him go too. With the powers that be who seem to hate the very air Xe breaths I think he probably was realizing the deck was stacked against him and took what might have seemed to be the best way out.
America is great!
You obviously formed an oppinion without the facts that this federal judge had at his disposal. Do you have a crystal ball that allows you to see the facts/truth in this case? I didn't think so. I would like to see you attempt to answer the question about Uhbamas friend in Chicago though since you seem to have all the answers. Come on...don't be afraid to answer!