Beach stops sealing jurors’ names in criminal cases

Posted to: News Virginia Beach

VIRGINIA BEACH

Circuit Court judges in the city are no longer automatically sealing jurors’ names in criminal cases. 

Chief Judge Frederick Lowe said  the court’s practice had ended after he and his colleagues read a state advisory committee’s proposed rule, published in October, specifying that sealing jurors’ names should take place “only upon a finding of good cause sufficient to warrant departure from the norm of open proceedings.”

The Beach court was the only one in the region to interpret a state law passed in 2008 as granting authority to automatically seal names of jurors deciding criminal cases. Open records advocates, the Virginia Press Association and some state lawmakers, including the bill’s sponsor, had said the Beach court’s policy appeared to stretch beyond the intent of the law.

The practice was not triggered by any instances of juror intimidation, but was a precautionary step. Jurors were still identified by name in open court during the selection process.

The law called for the state Supreme Court to publish rules addressing the confidentiality of jurors’ information.

A previously proposed rule called for a shift toward anonymous juries, with jurors being referred to by number rather than name during court proceedings. That proposal has been withdrawn and replaced by a new one that states “good cause” must be established before a judge orders jurors’ names be sealed.

Good cause, under the statute enacted last year, includes “a likelihood of bribery, tampering, or physical injury to or harassment of a juror.”

As a result, Lowe said, Beach judges are no longer doing “any general, wholesale sealing” of jurors’ information.

Jurors’ names will remain part of the court file and public record. The names of those who decided criminal cases in the city between November 2008 and October will remain sealed, unless the media or a person with a “legitimate interest or need,” as described in the statute, requests the names, Lowe said.

Ginger Stanley, executive director of the Virginia Press Association, said the proposed rule represented a “much better” interpretation of the law.

Public comment on the proposed rule will be accepted until April 15. The advisory panel will decide in May whether to accept the rule, which would then need to be approved by the state Supreme Court.

Shawn Day, (757) 222-5131, shawn.day@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

A calendar instead ?

Why not just send a calendar instead of all 12 juror members one for each month to hang on the wall, one for each month with picture and name ?

Huh ?

Too bad I have a hearing problem. First answer during jury selection probably would be "huh ?".

Commentors are only seeing one side

The accused have a right to know who decides their fate.

A RIGHT to know? Where is THAT written?

Accused have the right to be faced by their accuser, but where is it written they have the RIGHT to know the identification of those persons on the jury? Releasing jurors names creates all sorts of vulnerabilities to the jurors and their families. I disagree with your statement that it is a RIGHT and I disagree with the decision to release the names to the public. This just reinforces my feeling that lawyers and judges, as a whole, don't care about the safety of individuals or of the public at large.

I can see it now, man

I can see it now, man convicted by a jury of his peers who all happened to have stolen identities.

Why do they need to know ?

Why do they need to know ? So that they might try to intimidate them.
However, If they were found guilty I would want them to know That it was I, that found them guilty.

Self preservation is a good motivator...

I'm sure these comments are motivated by a fear for personal safety. For offenders who get paroled, the first 12 names on the revenge list will be the jurors who put them in prison.

I know the accused has a right to know who is accusing them and what those charges are. Is there an actual statute that says they have a right to know the names of their jury?

Either way, I can't really see a need to know which citizens performed their civic duty and convicted them unless they want some revenge. Or perhaps want to thank them for punishing them and setting them on the right path.

question

As the attorney, don’t' you have access to the information during the proceedings? What purpose does it serve for the defendant to have access to this info? I'm not the accuser. I'm just a citizen who was chosen to decide, based on the evidence. The only real purpose for the defendant to have it is to retaliate against the juror or his family. This is especially true when it involves gangs. Anyone worried about this will find one of the hundreds of ways to be disqualified as a juror before putting their family at risk. I know I would.
Just a thought.

This is a real reason to

This is a real reason to avoid jury duty.

Why change now?

I can't imagine any reason why the names of jurors is something that needs to be published. Otherwise, why don't they just do away with titles of jury foreman and instead use their real names, Mr. Jones, Ms. Spivey, etc. Will this include every juror who is voir dired, substitute jurors, or ones who actually enter a voted?? No good reason to change things now.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   



Toolbox


special features