Cole sailor describes bombing, but was he even on the ship?

Posted to: Military

In early November, retired Senior Chief Jeffrey Sparenberg was the guest of honor at military heritage day in Delaware.

Sparenberg spent 23 years in the Navy, including time on the destroyer Cole, and he was at Fort DuPont State Park that day to donate a flag that he said flew over the Cole shortly after it was attacked nine years ago.

The flag, he hoped, would be put on view at the planned Delaware Military Museum.

A photograph from the ceremony shows Sparenberg on the steps of a shuttered brick building. The left side of his chest is covered with military medals - including a Bronze Star and Purple Heart, purportedly from the actions he took and the injuries he suffered in that lunchtime attack.

Seventeen sailors died in the suicide bombing on Oct. 12, 2000, during a refueling stop in Aden, Yemen.

Sparenberg's detailed account of that fateful day was published on Nov. 16 in a front-page story in The News Journal of Wilmington, Del.

Now Sparenberg is back in the spotlight: The Navy and the ship's former commander say he was not on the Norfolk-based ship at all on the day it was struck.

They don't know whether the flag he donated actually flew aboard the Cole. And the two most significant medals he wore to the Delaware ceremony are also in doubt.

Lt. John Daniels, a Navy spokesman at the Pentagon, said Sparenberg's orders for the Cole show him joining the ship on Oct. 16, 2000 - four days after the bombing.

Retired Cmdr. Kirk Lippold, the Cole's skipper at the time, said he distinctly remembers being told after the attack that a new crew member was in Bahrain, waiting to join the ship.

Someone back in the States asked whether they should send the sailor back to the U.S., but Lippold - who'd just lost 17 crew members, including a senior chief - knew he could use more help. He gave approval for Sparenberg to join the crew.

"During the time he was on board the ship following the attack, he did an excellent job in helping the ship through some difficult times," Lippold said.

However, he added, "I know for a fact he wasn't aboard the day of the attack."

The News Journal has removed the original story from its Web site and says it will set the record straight after the Navy finishes looking into the matter.

Daniels said he wasn't sure how long that would take.

According to his personnel record, Daniels said, Sparenberg is not entitled to wear the Bronze Star or Purple Heart. The highest honor he earned in the Navy is a Meritorious Service Medal, shown to the right of the two combat honors in the photo.

"He was not in the line of fire on Oct. 12," Daniels said. "Him making any claims to being injured in the terrorist act on the USS Cole are not plausible."

Contacted on Thursday by The Virginian-Pilot, Sparenberg did not directly answer questions about when he arrived on the Cole or whether he wore medals he did not earn.

"I served on the Cole. I was with some of the greatest American heroes I know," said Sparenberg, who lives in Delaware.

He said he was trying to make sure the ship's crew was remembered and now has come under attack.

"I'm not going to say anything. I have no reason to say anything. I have no reason to prove anything," he said in response to a question about the medals.

Sparenberg said reliving the Cole attack is painful, and that he sometimes cries at night "thinking about what I had to do."

"I want this part of my life to go away," he said.

Lorrie Triplett might wish the same.

Triplett, who lives in Suffolk, lost her husband - Ensign Andrew Triplett - in the Cole attack. In the nine years since, she's raised their two daughters to be proud of their father's service.

In the Delaware newspaper article, Sparenberg talked in detail about working beside Triplett in the ship's fuels lab in the minutes before the blast. He described how Triplett told him to go to lunch - even mentioned the main entree that day in the galley - and how, seconds after he departed the lab, the detonation rocked the ship. Triplett died; Sparenberg lived.

Lorrie Triplett said Thursday she has never heard of Sparenberg. She's talked at length with two enlisted sailors who were in the fuels lab with her husband that morning, and through their accounts, she pieced together an idea of what her husband's final moments were like.

It's unsettling to her that someone the Navy said wasn't yet aboard the ship is now claiming a part in the narrative.

"It's like tampering with what happened," Triplett said.

"Why would you want to fabricate something to this extent for that event? Why would you want to say you were there at a tragedy?"

Kate Wiltrout, (757) 446-2629, kate.wiltrout@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Don't foult the promotion boards

Submitted by edwardc99290 on Sun, 12/06/2009 at 3:28 am.
"one can only wonder just what type of sailors we have been promoting to CPO. Evidently the promotion board have been making some serious errors."

The fault does not lie with promotion selection boards. They can only select from serec copies and inflated evals in front of them. The fault lies with CO's who overlook weakness in leadership in order to give their sailor top marks to keep them in competition. If you don't walk on water in a officer fitrep or enlisted eval you missed your boat.

A disgrace

This guy is an embarrasment and a disgrace. After reading this article, the fisaco at the Bahrain dog unit and about the Williams one can only wonder just what type of sailors we have been promoting to CPO. Evidently the promotion board have been making some serious errors.

you are so dead wrong with your claim.

The process of selecting Sailors to Chief as well as the Chief's community is strong. A Quality Mess is achieved through the process. Your comment demonstrates you have no clue of the character of the men and women who are selected to be a Chief. Of what it takes to get to that point. You also insult every Chief and Sailor who strives to become a Chief. The backbone of the Navy is the Chief. The goal of many carrier Sailors is to become a Chief because of what that title means.

Your opinion of individuals is your opinion. When you generalize to the point of insulting the Navy and the men and women who volunteer to serve and strive to make our Navy the best in the world, I have to take exception to your comments. You have never seen me, talked with me, reviewed my actions yet you feel you can make a statement that addresses my character of service in the Navy as something questionable. You went way outside the lines of respectful discussion to flagrant insult and lie about my service as a Chief and question my selection to Chief.

Sparenberg

I was standing watch on the QD of the USS Cole in Aden, Yemen when Sparenberg arrived along with another EMCS from SIMA as I recall. I was the first one to welcome Jeff aboard...he even wrote me an email last week that corroborated that story. His arrival was several days AFTER the bombing. I hope that the Navy does investigate...if he needs some medical/mental health care, I hope he gets it. If he is just looking for his 15 minutes of fame...then I hope he is prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Our shipmates deserve a speedy adjudication on this one. JUSTICE DELAYED IS JUSTICE DENIED.

Hmmmm...

According to an archived letter to Navy Times, he didn't exactly say then that he was on during the attack, but he insinuated:

"I still am serving onboard the Cole and, believe me, the word “hero” does not come up, nor do we seek that distinction. I have not received a medal and do not want one. I am still alive, and that is my reward."

Also notice that he says he did not receive a medal...no Bronze Star or Purple Heart. Interesting.

This letter was written during the time that the Cole license plates were still being discussed...yeah, that many years ago. So even THEN he was making it sound like he was on there during the attack??

Comment

I have followed this story and read the many comments with interest...and sadness. NCguy, while you bring up a worthy point of giving a fellow Chief the benefit of the doubt, I feel that you have missed the point. There are at least three posts from fellow shipmates who refute his assertion he was onboard at the time of the bombing. In addition, the CO himself has refuted the assertion that Sparenberg was onboard at the time of the bombing. It is commendable to stand at the side of a fellow CPO in time of trouble. However, it is also disrespectful to cast aside the statements of shipmates who were there at the time. For this person to depict himself as the recipient of medals he does not deserve and attempt to falsify the historical record is reprehensible. I conducted a little background investigation of my own and quickly discovered that Sparenberg neither deserved the medals he was photographed wearing nor was onboard the USS COLE when she suffered her tragic attack; it is documented. He has embarrassed the Mess and disgraced the Navy. I pity his family.
MCPO(ret)

I give all the benifit of a doubt. For someone to claim

and wear awards is disrespectful to those who were there as well as to the medal and what the medal stands for. I do not condone, or support him wearing those medals. What I do see is an individual that should not be invited to Cole events. His reality is confused. He sees and believes things that are not true as stated by the various folks mentioned. Why does he do this, I do not know. What I do see is a lot of people, Sailors, Chiefs and civilians who have passed judgment on him. That is what I am about. I may be making an assumption that he has a different reality, others wish to courts martial him for lying. His actions are clearly not what is expected of a SC. So the WHY he is doing it has to be figured out. At many DRBs, we look to the WHY of an action, and make appropriate recommendations that may not include punitive measures. Some were psychological reviews. Once the rational for the SC action are realized, then make appropriate judgments. I have not seen the why, and reserve conclusion, which respects all parties. He does hurt Cole survivors with his actions, so recommend not inviting him to Cole functions as a speaker.

side issue question

Is he claiming the Bronze for meritorious service or for valor?

He certainly should be able to produce the citations for it and the Purple Heart.

DRB sounds like a good idea...

One of the other posters mentioned having a DRB for this E-8. Great Idea! My only concern is can do we find a big enough venue to hold us all? I am sure that all of us who have had the honor of wearing the Anchors of a United States Navy Chief, as well as those who are wearing it now(thanks for your service my brothers),would like to be in attendance. Respectfully, a retired BMC.

Can't make up his mind

Here is the document summary from the 11/03/09 article in The News Journal - Wilmington, DE where he is listed as a Chier Warrant Officer....Chief Warrant Officer Jeff Sparenberg, a Cole crew member hurt in the blast and now retired to New Castle County, was presented the flag by the commander but decided to share it with the public by giving it to the new Delaware Military Museum, said event coordinator Bill Conley.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features