77°
forecast

Crew says Maersk Alabama capt. ignored warnings

Posted to: News

MONTPELIER, Vt.

Richard Phillips, the ship captain toasted as a hero after he was taken captive by Somali pirates, ignored warnings last spring to keep his freighter at least 600 miles off the African coast because of the heightened risk of attack, some members of his crew now say.

Records obtained by The Associated Press show that maritime safety groups issued at least seven such warnings in the days before outlaws boarded the Maersk Alabama in the Gulf of Aden, about 380 miles offshore.

A piracy expert and the captain's second-in-command say Phillips had the prerogative to heed the warnings or not. But some crew members - including the chief engineer, the helmsman and the navigator - say he was negligent not to change course after learning of the pirate activity.

"If you go to the grocery store and eight people get mugged on that street, wouldn't you go a different way?" said the ship's navigator, Ken Quinn of Tampa, Fla.

Sailing beyond the 600-mile threshold would have added more than a day to the Alabama's voyage to Mombasa, Kenya, and would have used extra fuel, according to the ship's previous captain, who said Phillips had years of experience sailing in those dangerous waters.

Four of the 20 crew members said they blame Phillips for the hijacking.

"He caused this, and we all know it," said chief engineer Mike Perry of Riverview, Fla. "All the Alabama crew knows about it."

Reached by telephone at his home in Underhill, Vt., Phillips said he could not answer every "spurious accusation" and that he expected such criticism.

"But I don't wish to say anything. I want you to report that I had no comment," he said.

One of the four crew members who spoke to the media is part of a lawsuit filed against Norfolk-based Maersk Line Ltd. alleging the company was negligent in sending the ship into treacherous waters without more protection. The other members are not involved in any legal action related to the hijacking.

A separate complaint has also been filed against Phillips with the U.S. Coast Guard.

Capt. Shane Murphy of Plymouth, Mass., who was second-in-command during the siege, defended Phillips.

"If he was warned to stay off a certain distance and he stayed closer, I'm sure he thought he had a reason for doing it and felt like he was justified in it," Murphy said. "I don't think he was negligent. Maybe just stubborn."

Maersk Line officials would not comment on the advisories or on Phillips' handling of them, citing the pending legal cases.

Company spokesman Kevin Speers would say only that the Maersk Alabama operated in "high-risk waters quite frequently, and that is part of the considerations that we take in putting together vessel security plans."

SecureWest International, a maritime security organization that issued several of the advisories, would not respond to requests for comment. SecureWest has an office in Norfolk.

The Associated Press obtained copies of the advisories from a fifth crew member who did not want to be interviewed on the record.

The Alabama's crew was apparently unaware of the advisories during the April 8 attack and the five days Phillips was held hostage in a lifeboat by three pirates. Navy SEAL sharpshooters aboard the Norfolk-based guided-missile destroyer Bainbridge freed him by killing the men.

Crew members found the warnings in the ship's computer system when the Alabama returned to sea, Perry said.

On March 24, SecureWest warned of pirate attacks east of Somalia that had taken place more than 500 nautical miles offshore. It advised ships to "consider maintaining a distance of more than 600 nautical miles from the coastline."

On April 1, the United Kingdom Maritime Trade Organization - a joint military command that coordinates anti-piracy efforts around the Horn of Africa - reported a recent passenger-ship hijacking, gave the longitude and latitude of where it happened, and repeated the 600-mile recommendation in an e-mail addressed to "Maersk Alabama - Master."

Over the next six days, SecureWest repeated the recommendation in an e-mail to the Alabama that reported an April 2 attack. The company also sent a warning to more than a dozen ships in the region about an unidentified container vessel being attacked and reported that a German-owned container ship had also been hijacked.

"The Coalition Forces would like to reiterate that, despite increased naval presence in the region, ships and aircraft are unlikely to be close enough to provide support to vessels under attack. The scope and magnitude of problem cannot be understated," SecureWest warned on April 7.

The same day, SecureWest reported a "suspicious approach" of three skiffs to an unidentified vessel in the Indian Ocean. A day later, it sent out word of the Alabama's attack, warning vessels in the region to be careful.

"The advisories are fairly general," said piracy expert Derek Reveron, professor of national security affairs at the Naval War College, in Newport, R.I. "It's a big ocean. To stay 600 miles away, it's kind of hard to do, at some point. There's a limit to what they could reasonably do."

Reveron says it's the skipper's purview to heed such warnings or ignore them.

When the Alabama was at sea, Quinn said, he plotted the positions of recent pirate attacks, "and they were right on our course line. Phillips sailed us right through the middle of all of that."

The ship could have gone another 100 miles out, "and it would've taken us out of the localized area where all the pirates were. That's what they were trying to tell us, to stay away from there," Quinn said.

The ship's helmsman, Abu Tasir Mohammed Reza of West Hartford, Conn., said he lost respect for Phillips once he found out about the warnings.

"He didn't follow those warnings," Reza said. "He did not realize that something is coming ahead. He did not take it seriously. He did not change the course."

Phillips, 54, a 30-year merchant marine, would not address the topic of the warnings when contacted.

"Bottom line, it was the captain's call," said Capt. Larry Aasheim, whom Phillips had relieved as skipper about 10 days before the hijacking.

Aasheim, of Virginia Beach, discussed the piracy threat with Phillips when he turned over command. He says Phillips may have been trying to save fuel and time in not heeding the 600-mile recommendation.

"I told him there are advisories out recommending that vessels stay off an increased distance," he said. "But he's been on that run for a couple of years. If he increased the distance to 600 miles, it adds 1-1/2 days of transit time and a lot of fuel. You've got to think about that."

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

blame fail

"Four of the 20 crew members said they blame Phillips for the hijacking.

"He caused this, and we all know it," said chief engineer Mike Perry of Riverview, Fla."

Sorry, Mr. Perry, but the Somali pirates "caused this," not Captain Phillips.

Captain Phillips

Captain Phillips took a gamble by choosing a course that would take the Alabama closer to pirate-infested waters. I do not doubt Maresk pushed him to take the shorter route, saving the company money and time. He took it and he lost, but in doing so, he took full responsibility for his actions, which the course of events clearly proves.

The crewmembers going after him now are being foolish: what he did probably saved their lives, even while it endangered his. That and they don't have to ship out with him ever again.

Frivolous Lawsuit? You Bet.

It's too bad these disgruntled crew members let some ambulance chasing lawyer talk them into filing a lawsuit. This will just waste the time and resources of the court system and shipping company to no or little avail. The captain is the master of the ship, and I just don't think Capt. Phillips did anything wrong. Leave him alone and find something constructive to do with your time

Since when is it news that

Since when is it news that big business puts the bottom line ahead of people's safety and well-being? A real story would be if he actually was dealt with and punished accordingly for putting lives in danger to save time and money. It's a business, the only difference is that it's floating around. I think it's funny that he's been accepting all this praise and attention, and the whole time he's been walking around a fraud.

350 or 600

Does it really make any difference how far out the ship was? The problem is that commercial vessels should not have to expend time and money to avoid pirates. These pirates should be met with deadly force. There are enough "blackwater" groups out there that the shipping companies could put a few men on these ships with RPG's. Sink a few pirate boats and they would get the message quickly. We should not run and hide from criminals.

These guys are finished!

Career's over! Throwing the captain under the bus for what some low life pirates did! Get ready to find a new job as no one will want you as a shipmate now and you can bet every move you make, every mistake will be documented. The Captain gave himself up to try and save these fools and this is how they repay him!

Amen!

Yeah - this guy trades his life for thiers, and this is how they thank him... Sad. These chumps should be muzzled.

According to the Chief

According to the Chief Engineer a gun was pointed at the Captain and he was escorted away...he didn't exclaim "take me and leave the rest of the crew..." Starting to smell like the Jessica Lynch story. Remember? The heroine Army Private who was out for the count and never fired her weapon at her captors. I agree...continue to investigate this matter and we will find out who the real heroes are.

According to the Chief?

You mean according to a man who has filed a lawsuit and has every motive to make Captain Phillips look as bad as possible?

Hero or Reckless

As a member of the general public, I agree that Capt Phillips should be recognized as a hero for his self-less action to exchange his life for the lives of his crew. This action is one example of many deeply rooted in tradition of naval/maritime history. It develops trust, as a ship's captain/master must be willing to assume the same risk he/she is asking everyone onboard to assume by trusting his/her judgement and actions.
As a member of ship's crew onboard naval vessels, I was expected to and I expected the ship's captain to utilize operational risk management. For those of you reading this who are not familiar with operational risk management; the underling principle is, "Do the benefits outweigh the risks and cost?" Given the information that is known about the risks and that the Captain was aware of those risk factors, it is reasonable that the crew members have the right to ask the Captain/Master to justify how he determined that the "Benefits outweigh the ultimate risk of the crew lifes." in his ultimate decision to take the route he took.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed   


Toolbox