Despite naval forces, pirate attacks off Somalia nearly double

Posted to: Military

From wire reports

NAIROBI, Kenya

A helicopter fired warning shots toward a suspected pirate skiff, where six Somali men sat among assault rifles, grappling hooks and an aluminum ladder. But before it could be boarded by sailors from a nearby warship, the men threw all the gear overboard.

With little evidence to convict them, the would-be pirates were let go, along with their boat and enough fuel to get to Somalia. Nothing was done to prevent the men from rearming and trying again.

The recent high-seas encounter illustrates how the multinational naval force deployed a year ago  to stem piracy has had limited success. Experts say the attacks won’t stop unless pirate havens inside Somalia are eliminated.

But that goal remains elusive. The U.N.-backed Somali government can barely hold a section of the capital, let alone go after onshore pirate havens. Foreign governments are reluctant to deploy ground forces.

Pirate attacks nearly doubled in 2009 over a year earlier, despite the deployment in December 2008 of the European Union Naval Force – the first international force specifically to counter Somali pirates.

It was followed in January by Combined Task Force 151, composed of U.S. Navy ships and those of several allied nations. Several Norfolk-based ships have served with the task force – most recently, the guided-missile cruiser Anzio was its flagship.

Somali pirates currently hold 12 vessels and more than 260 crew members for ransom.

Still, proponents of the force note the pirates’ success rate has been cut roughly in half since the patrols began.

“A lot more ships would have been taken if we weren’t there,” Cmdr. John Harbour, the European force’s spokesman, said  last week. He said the pirates had not seized any ships in the heavily trafficked Gulf of Aden since July, which he called evidence of the force’s impact. But on Monday, Somali pirates seized a British-flagged chemical tanker there.

Somali pirates have tried to board at least 214 vessels so far this year, seizing 47 of them, the International Maritime Bureau said Tuesday. That compares with  42 successful attacks out of 111 attempts in 2008, before the EU Naval Force and Combined Task Force 151 deployed. And the 111 attempts  represented a 200 percent increase from 2007.

The pirates have responded to the presence of the  warships  by turning their attention to less-protected waters. To carry out raids beyond the heavily patrolled maritime corridors, pirates have begun using captured vessels as mother ships, enabling them to attack vessels as far as 1,000 miles off Somalia’s coast, Harbour said.

“We can’t say that anyone has won the war against piracy. It’s still very much ongoing,” said Cyrus Mody at the International Maritime Bureau. “There is still a significant amount of piracy. It has not reduced since last year.”

Even with the rise in pirate attacks, only a fraction of the tens of thousands of vessels that travel each year through the Gulf of Aden and western Indian Ocean are targeted. That means there is little pressure for governments to deploy ground forces to neutralize pirate havens in Somalia.

Naval forces who intercept pirates usually follow a “disrupt and deter” policy. The forces confiscate any weapons or other equipment, then release the suspects with enough fuel to return to Somalia, avoiding long, costly trials ashore. Generally only those caught red-handed in piracy are detained.

Once pirates are aboard a targeted vessel, naval forces do not try to intervene, for fear of hostages being killed or wounded.

Still, even if there were more arrests, Somalia’s poverty-stricken population provides plenty of men willing to try piracy to get a share of the multimillion-dollar ransoms. Only by imposing control over the shore can piracy be brought under control, experts say.

“It’s not going to be solved by racing around the Indian Ocean with warships, capturing pirates,” Rear Adm. Peter Hudson, the commander of the EU Naval Force’s counter-piracy efforts, said in Nairobi recently. “The long-term solution, of course, is ashore in Somalia.”

Northern Somalia shows how efforts on the ground can translate into success.

The gains are starting to occur in the semi-autonomous region of Puntland, which wants a share of the $250 million pledged to Somalia at a U.N.-sponsored international donor’s conference in April to help stabilize the nation and fund humanitarian work.

Author Jay Bahadur, who has spent time in Puntland researching a book on piracy, said last January there was only one police checkpoint on the outskirts of the regional capital of Garowe, long a pirate boomtown. By June and July there were many more and authorities had begun to launch raids against suspected pirates, he said.

There has also been a local backlash against pirates, he said, because they indulge in un-Islamic behavior such as drinking and using prostitutes, and their spending of ransom money has triggered soaring inflation.

“The climate on the ground is more and more anti-pirate,” Bahadur said.

The increased security on land and at sea has forced the pirates further south, away from their former base at Eyl  in Puntland and into the strongholds of Haradhere and Hobyo, according to Bahadur and Harbour.

But there is no such security presence in the south, large swaths of which are controlled by al-Shabab insurgents. Controlling piracy is not a priority for  the weak government or the insurgents as they fight for control of the battle-scarred capital of Mogadishu.

Somalia  does not have the resources to fight piracy. Its navy has only three working boats. The head of Somalia’s small navy, Adm. Farah Ahmed, said several countries have pledged aid but haven’t delivered.

Given Somalia’s lawlessness, limited resources and the difficulty of pursuing every pirate in a vast ocean, pirate attacks will remain a problem for years to come, experts say.

Still, Harbour said the naval force is confident it is preventing piracy from getting worse.

“We are policing the waves against criminals,” he said. “No police force can achieve a 100 percent crime-free area, but we are definitely making a difference.”

This story was compiled from reports by The Associated Press, The New York Times and The Virginian-Pilot.

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

...

"If violent crime is to be curbed, it is only the intended victim who can do it. The felon does not fear the police, and he fears neither judge nor jury. Therefore what he must be taught to fear is his victim." - Jeff Cooper

The same applies to these high-seas criminals. When more and more who leave to pillage are never seen again on shore, fewer and fewer will decide to take up the ‘trade’.

No excuse for this

Every ship should be armed and every Pirate should be shot out of the water. Don't pick up any survivors. You don't assist a mad dog. We have made this a big problem because we are scared to deal with it. It would be no problem at all if they knew they would be killed if they tried to take over a ship in the open waters.

did anyone else get the impression that our Navy, or the actions

of our Naval forces was a failure with the headlines of this article? Why does the Pilot do that to our Navy? Looking at the numbers, it is because of world military presence in the region that the number of captured ships went up from 42 to 47. The pilot wont make that the headline. Another example of how the Pilot tries to show our military in a negative light. Just think what the headlines would be if one of our destroyers or cruisers did engage these pirates with weapons or rammed them. Would it be "US Navy utilizes unnecessary force against rag tag Somalians"? No matter what our guys and gals are doing, the Pilot will look for the bad. Do we have to kill every pirate when we have helos that can make them throw their weapons overboard? Those pirates can't capture anything. They limp home to a very unwelcome reception. Do it enough, and those particular pirates will be out of a job. Unless Congress/President states that because of the actions of these pirates, a state of war has existed between the US and Somolia/Yeman etc, what we are doing is probably the best we can do. The Pilot does not wish to see that.

NCguy

You are being pretty hard on the Pilot. Read the bottom of their article. The Pilot got their story from multiple sources. And, one can read that article and take it anyway you wish. Don't find fault with our local news source.

Yes I am as the Pilot appears to go out of their way to

imply or report the negative our military is doing. The good we do is not vogue and appears to be reported reluctantly. The pilot loves to include Blackwater's negative actions in Iraq as a military thing, when that is a private company and hired by the State Department. But it is tagged to the military because there is murder of civilians and use of deadly force by "the military".
“We are policing the waves against criminals,” he said. “No police force can achieve a 100 percent crime-free area, but we are definitely making a difference” and the headline do not jive. Nor does the fact that attacks are up double, while successful take overs have stayed the same. That was not the headline either. The headline implied that naval forces (in a Navy town) were failing because attacks are up nearly double. The story writes something completely different. The information came from various sources, but was compiled (written) here. The Pilot wrote the headlines for which they opted to paint our Navy in a negative light when the compiled story indicates our Navy is successful in this action. Calling it like i see it.

Comic Relief

If you think like the young men from a failed state, then you will probably get it. "I live in a country with no future, I have no education, the only rich people I see are bandits who steal, traffikers in narcotics or humans and corrupt politicians. I can't get a woman unless I have some money. I can't get money because there are no jobs. My life isn't worth anything, so I may as well join the Pirates and perhaps my chances of success in life go from 0 to 1 in 1M. I read somewhere that out of 700 pirates caught/stopped. only 35 were actually jailed and 3 were killed. Only the USA reall pushes the issues, the Europeans let them go because they don't even have laws in the EU on how to deal with this yet. There is an easy way to stop pirate, just pass out guns to everyone in the merchant marines. The Maersk Alabama crew who overpowered their captors and their captain who aided their escape proved Americans are quite tough. Even if one of them had a 38 sp. hidden in his boot, it would have been over before it started.

Apply the Castle Doctrine concept

I have to agree with arming the ships for self protection of the mariners living onboard as well as protecting their valuable cargo. The Castle Doctrine http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Castle_Doctrine_in_the_United_States
states you may use deadly force for self defense, so why is the internation laws so outdated as to not allow ship owners to self protect themselves ? How many pirates will continue to try to board a vessel knowing they will face a hail of gunfire from above. Seems like such a simple solution - arm the ships.

If we're going to "get tough" with the pirates,

we'd better be sure to send along legal teams to "lawyer-up" any prisoners so they will be able to press charges against any U.S. military member who might "abuse" them during the process.

The time is approaching when we'll need battlefield lawyers and lawyers at airports to protect the rights of any "alleged" terrorists who might fall into U.S. custody.

Our intrepid Attorney General and "Justice" Department won't have it any other way.

And whoever said the world was turning upside down and that reason and common sense were things of the past?

Legal

No survivors = no lawyers, no problem!

Problem solved

Do a complete press blockout then turn the sailors and marines loose. Take off the gloves, No more problem!!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Military rss feed   



Toolbox


 

special features