75°
forecast

Dominion officials rehearsed their message about safety of fly ash, report says

Posted to: Chesapeake Environment News

CHESAPEAKE

Dominion Virginia Power executives and developers pressed a clear and simple message about building a golf course from coal waste.

Once treated, the material was “safe as dirt.”

 But in closed-door meetings, Dominion executives deliberated for months about the tone and substance of these simple pronouncements, according to recent court filings. 

The executives anticipated public questions, and rehearsed and parsed their answers. They drew lines on what to share with regulators and what to hide.

In one memo about preparing for a public hearing, a participant wrote, “Do not mention hazardous vs. drinking water. Just say 'completely non-hazardous.’”

It worked. State regulators raised little resistance. Local officials trusted the energy company’s judgment and granted approval.

But court records show the trust eroding as the 1.5 million tons of coal ash, containing hazardous materials, flowed into the rural community by the truckload.

More than 400 people have sued Dominion, the golf course developer and owners in Chesapeake Circuit Court this year for more than $1 billion in damages. Residents  contend that the energy company ignored consultants who told them hazardous materials would leach into drinking water wells. They called the development a “toxic waste site masquerading as a 'golf course.’”

A longtime Dominion employee, who lives next to the course, talked with  a company  executive  and endorsed the project to neighbors and the Chesapeake City Council. In a sworn statement, he said his home and property are contaminated and his son’s asthma grew worse. He’s now suing the company  for which he has worked for 24 years.

A contractor who helped build the course also became disillusioned.

Residents living near the golf course say in their suit that Dominion Power wove stories that a golf course built from potentially hazardous materials could be safely constructed on low-lying farmland.

Virginia Dominion Power officials maintain they met and often exceeded legal requirements to study and disclose the risks to regulators and the public. Company officials say they continue to work with city, state and federal officials to address environmental concerns.

--------

The problem was a growing pile of coal waste at Dominion’s Chesapeake Energy Center, or CEC, visible from the High-Rise Bridge on Interstate 64 , according to letters between the energy company and the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality.

A state engineer  warned Dominion that the coal waste was piled too steep and may have violated their permit, according to a 2001 letter.

One solution was to combine the ash with other compounds, stabilize  it and use it for a safer purpose. Coal ash is widely used as an ingredient for road beds, concrete and other construction materials.

Dominion officials offered the  coal ash  for treatment and fill at a  new golf course being built on a 217-acre site off Centerville Turnpike. A Dominion vice president, Martin Bowling, wrote to DEQ regional director Frank Daniel in January  2002 to announce that the proposed golf course  would, “beneficially use a large quantity of coal combustion byproducts from the Chesapeake Energy Center.”

Officials from Dominion and CPM, an  ash management  company building the golf course, helped get the project approved.

In handwritten notes of a March 2001 meeting among golf course developers and Dominion officials, the team frankly discussed an arsenic problem in the groundwater under the Chesapeake plant. Officials needed to practice answers for residents’ queries.

The author of the handwritten notes is not identified in the lawsuit. The person attended several high-level meetings involving company officials from  public relations, legal and environmental engineering departments. The notes were filed with the court by attorneys for the residents. They were found among more than 1,300 pages of documents filed in two suits since March.

Lawyers who brought the lawsuit on behalf of the residents declined to comment for this story.

Before an early 2001 public hearing, officials prepared a list of sample questions.

For example, to answer whether the ash was a danger to the wells that supplied water to all the residents, the memo suggested that in a probable worst-case scenario, the groundwater leached from the coal ash would meet six of eight federal standards for drinking water. In a handwritten aside, the author warned not to mention the material was “hazardous vs. groundwater.”

In a final note preparing for the hearing, a practice question asked, “How will the golf course help this community?”

The answer included another question: “A golf course also increases the property values in the area.” It was punctuated, in parentheses, with a question mark.

In another meeting about environmental issues, Dominion and CPM officials discussed deeper problems.

“If public thinks ash is benign, what happens if/when citizens find out what may be different?” an April 2001 memo noted. The author noted that Dominion has given DEQ some information, “but they don’t have all info (have some worse).”

Max Bartholomew, a spokesman for Dominion, attended many of the planning meetings, along with officials from CPM, according to the notes.

In June, Bartholomew assured then-Mayor William E. Ward that the company monitored the fly ash and there were no environmental concerns that the city should be aware of. The City Council approved the project.

Residents maintain they would have fought the project if they  had known the risks. Dominion said  it provided the material for the project, but the  developer, CPM, treated it and built the golf course. The company lawyers say the residents’ case is seriously flawed and should be dismissed on legal grounds.

Dominion spokesman Dan Genest said in a statement the matter is in litigation and “we will therefore provide responses to all of the plaintiff’s allegations at the appropriate time and in the appropriate venue .”

--------

Outside the conference rooms, two former backers of the project gradually came to view it differently.

Derrick Howell earned  $60,000 a year as a golf course “shaper,” using a bulldozer to carve landscapes to an architect’s the exacting requirements.

 Howell had one bulldozer to manage the treated fly ash dumped by up to 100 trucks every day. He led a crew of  up to five men to bury and shape the material, he said in an interview.

At closed-door meetings with contractor CPM and Dominion, Howell and his boss asked for more labor. But, he said, “It was always about moving fly ash.” Howell is not a party in the lawsuit; he said he spoke up because a friend living near the course asked him.

Bob Stephenson, according to his sworn statement, moved  his wife and two boys into a four-bedroom house on Murray Drive in March 1999. Their back yard is adjacent to the golf course.

Stephenson is a longtime Dominion Virginia Power employee.

He  trusted his company. He stood before his neighbors and the City Council and endorsed the golf course project, according to his statement.

Soon, dump trucks hauling fly ash were making hundreds of trips past his house. “This went on for years,” he said. Some even turned around in his driveway.

One of his sons has asthma, and it grew worse in the dark ash clouds, he said. Eventually, they would have to stop drinking their well water.

Stephenson still works for Dominion. His family still lives in their home on Murray Drive.

The neighborhood no longer uses well water for cooking and drinking. Instead, families line up outside a small shack in the parking lot behind Centerville Baptist Church, where a spigot delivers fresh water. People fill up plastic jugs several times a week.

The city has assessed the Stephenson’s home and four-acre property at $373,000. He’s been told not to bother putting it on the market.

In a brief interview, he said, “I don’t think I can give it away.”

Louis Hansen, (757) 222-5221, louis.hansen@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

According to the Pilot, Megaman,

The city's health director told residents that there is nothing wrong with their drinking water. To this day, the drinking water is safe. Those folks are drinking bottled water because of what might be in the water, not because of what has been proven to be there.

nakedtruth4u

If you believe that, how about you & your family visit the surrounding homes and have a fresh glass of clean drinking water. You should have no problems with that, considering you trust the investigation of the city.

Hey the City of Chesapeake has technical expertise!

It's interesting reading all the posts from 'experts' on fly ash. If you take the Pilot's and ambulance chaser's agenda on face value, you'd think that Vepco officials hoodwinked a bunch of country hicks. But for anyone willing to look, all the staff reports surrounding the development of the golf course are on the city's website. I just read them! Funny, all of the natural constituents in fly ash were listed in these reports BEFORE the city's Planning Commission voted unanimously to endorse the project and BEFORE their council voted unanimously to approve the project. People, do your homework before you spout your opinions! All of the HR cities have well qualified technical people on staff, with access to even more technical expertise available to them. To hide behind, 'we were duped' is disingenuous and void of the facts on record. Read for yourself. This goes for the Pilot as well.

Conspiracy?

"The executives anticipated public questions, and rehearsed and parsed their answers. They drew lines on what to share with regulators and what to hide."

Criminal intent?

Chesapeake

I agree. It's almost criminal to think that our local elected officials do not exercise, investigative prowess. This is not the first time we have seen citizen safety compromised for the rush to develop. I hope everyone pays close attention to the upcoming City Council elections. We have an opportunity to invoke change that will hopefully promote a more conservative thinking government.

What bothers me...

Is that you can still see the same "consultant" applying for projects and variances on the televised council and planing commission meetings. I even witnessed one ex-council member, also a consultant apply to build on an old landfill with methane gas OVER the lower explosive limit! VOTERS, please vote these council members out of office! Keep those in realestate and the developers and bankers out of Local government!

No such thing as 'clean coal'

It's been known for quite sometime that coal fly-ash is poisonous. The only way to use it safely is to embed it in non-porous materials as the article pointed out. There were two failures here: one was by Dominion Power to agree to release the material for the golf course in the first place. The second by the city for approving this project using what they had to have known was a hazardous material. Both should shoulder the blame and both should be held accountable.

Dirt is not regulated but can be toxic!

Dirt is not regulated! Golf courses are toxic depositories for unregulated fertilizers, crop production pest controls and dirt.

Banned pesticides and toxic fertilizers are still be used on turf (i.e. golf courses). And like fertilizer, there is zero regulation/control on dirty.

Dirt can be toxic. It can contain toxic elements like mercury, arsenic, radium, and radio-nuclides. The later of which are known to cause bone cancer in people and animals. My healthy German Short-hair pointer died after tasting such dirt.

treated coal ash as safe as dirt

Dirt is not regulated and is not necessarily safe for public health. Golf courses are toxic waste/toxic disposal grounds for unregulated fertilizers and mostly unregulated pesticides (also known as crop protection products).

Banned pesticides can still be used on turf (i.e. golf courses), which also uses large quantities of totally unregulated fertilizers. These products once came into silos as legally hazardous waste and were magically changed into fertilizer if they contained elements to allow plants to grow. This magic is developed by the manufacturer and disposal companies of such waste. Toxic waste recycled into a new product.

Pesticides only have to be registered by the US EPA before they are transported. The law does not require safety to public health. While the law did require testing for endocrine disruption, this disappeared during to first of this decade and the law is mired with loopholes.

There is zero regulation/control on dirt. My husband bought some inexpensive top soil (dirt) to fill holes left from decayed roots after hurricanes Lili and Rita downed trees in Louisiana. The dirt may have contained brine from oil and gas operations, as my dog tasted

Local Government was at fault here

Fly-ash always fails TCLP testing. It contains several toxic metals and arsenic. If it weren't for the legal exemption, it would have to be disposed of as hazardous waste. The exemption was granted because of the large quantities generated and so it could be used for responsible purposes like for roads. The City of Chesapeake officials were just being greedy and disregarded the fact that nearby resident were depending on groundwater for drinking water. All City leaders saw was increased revenues from the tax increase to the home owners because THEY allowed a golf course to be built. It backfired and now the taxpayers are going to have to pay thanks to greedy developers! For all of you who think the toxicity of fly-ash is minimal, I'm sure the adjacent home-owners will let you drink their well water!

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Environment rss feed    News rss feed   



Toolbox