Mike Saewitz
The Virginian-Pilot
©
Gov. Timothy M. Kaine proposed Friday that state employees start contributing to their retirement benefit plans, an expense that has been borne entirely by the state since 1983.
Under the outgoing governor's budget, state employees would contribute 1 percent of their salaries toward their pension next year and 2 percent the following year.
The change could affect 80,000 state employees, 150,000 teachers and 100,000 local government employees who are part of Virginia's retirement system. It could save the state $55 million over two years. Currently, the state pays both employee and employer contributions to the Virginia Retirement System.
Local governments and school boards would have the option of requiring employees to do the same, Kaine said.
The budget is subject to approval by the General Assembly and incoming Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican. A McDonnell spokeswoman wouldn't comment on the proposal by Kaine, a Democrat.
"This is not what we hoped to announce, but these changes are necessary to manage through this very difficult fiscal situation," Kaine said.
Virginia is one of eight states that do not require government workers to contribute to retirement plans and one of three that pay contributions on behalf of employees.
Two Republican legislators reached Friday had differ ing opinions.
Del. John Cosgrove of Chesapeake said he hoped changes would involve only new employees. "That would have been the most equitable way of going about this."
Del. Chris Jones of Suffolk, a member of the House Appropriations Committee, said he and others on the committee are concerned about the rising cost of the retirement system, which could need an additional $400 million from the general fund over the next two years. "I don't think it's unreasonable for employees to share in the cost of funding their retirement," Jones said, adding that making changes for only new employees would not result in major savings this year.
Requiring state employees to contribute 2 percent of their salaries could save the state general fund about $46 million each year and local school districts as much as $186 million per year, according to Senate Finance Committee documents.
Virginia Beach Mayor Will Sessoms, who started a task force to examine retirement costs, said it's too early to know whether the city would want to adopt the proposal. "It's certainly something that needs to be considered for new hires, but we'll have to wait and see what our committee says," Sessoms said.
Chesapeake Councilman C.E. "Cliff" Hayes Jr. said he imagines his board would also consider changes to new employees' pension contributions before changing the deal for current employees. At least one Chesapeake schools official said teachers may have to ask themselves a question.
"The question becomes, am I better off paying that 1 percent than either me losing my job or the person in the next classroom losing their job?" said Vicki Lucente, a Chesapeake assistant superintendent.
Dominic Melito, president of the Virginia Beach Education Association, said he hoped that if Kaine's proposal is adopted it could be rescinded if the economy improves or that local school boards would consider picking up the cost for employees.
Beach School Board President Dan Edwards said, "Clearly, it's a huge paradigm shift and one we would clearly not want unless there were no other options."
Aaron Applegate, (757) 222-5122, aaron.applegate@pilotonline.com
Mike Saewitz, (757) 222-5207, mike.saewitz@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo

Should The Govener Also have his pension reduced.
We often in a time of financial crises hear from our elected officials that we all need to sacrifice for the good of the state and to pay for the mistakes of overspending. I just wonder how much the Governor and other high dollar officials will offer to reduced their benefits and retirement.
In a time of great change we are often ask to sacrifice. What amazes me is how many at the top don't give back to make theses changes work. For example the new health bill, will not be for the Senators Congress or any other cabinet position, as the have totally free medical and do not even pay a deductible. Yest they ask us "being the boss" to make sacrifices they will never bear. Shame on The greed of a few to burden the masses.
If you make them pay, let them choose
One big problem with the system is the fact (pointed out with the article about Sheriff Stolle and Moss) is that the payout is based on the three highest years. Basing it on a composite of the amount earned over time would be much more fair. Raising the age factor (yrs and service = 90 or 91) would also be fair. Cutting health benefits when a retiree is on medicare could save more. But fairest of all would be letting employees vote on what they are willing to contribute and what to naturally expect based on that.
Message for Governors Kaine & McDonnell
Get rid of the needless “make work” procedures that reduce efficiency and require more workers. Productivity could be elevated if experienced employees were not constantly breaking in new employees (due to low pay). A smaller, experienced work force is more economical than a larger inexperienced work force required to perform fluff procedures and spend half their time training new people. Dump VRS for a modern retirement plan that employees can take with them, and bring in with them as new hires. Quit embarrassing employees by getting rid of stupid holidays Like Lee-Jackson Day; most agencies work 24/7 anyway and don’t get off on all holidays. Save money through better pay: you get what you pay for and that includes productivity.
401k funding
The politicans won't give their opinions until the consult the poll numbers. Big deal - 1% - I think ALL public servants should contribute to their retirement plans.
Future is uncertian
Companies found out a long time ago that people are not staying the 20 to 25 years for retirement. The military realized this 10 years ago. The solution 401k. A way the employee paid in, the employeer matched it, and it moved with the employee. Now you can move from company to company and keep getting more pay raises in the process. Sounds like the state and hopefully the cities will fallow suit. This is not the 1940's where people worked their whole lives for one company. A program like this initiated by the state will allow more leverage to move around and not worry about losing your retirement. If you can move from Virginia Beach to Richmond, transfer your retirement, and get a better paying job there, I think more people would be willing to go for it. Plus you will not find yourself locked in to work your whole life and get less for the time. I believe this is better for the employees. Yes the state may save money money now but, this should have been done years ago. It should be an option for current employees and manditory for new hires.
Good Move
It is way past time to make this change.
"Gov. Timothy M. Kaine proposed Friday that state employees
start contributing to their retirement benefit plans . . ."
Timmy the Stealth Guvnor doesn't need your votes right now (DNC Big Cheese isn't an elected position) so all ye suckers who elected him to this part time gig that's ending soon can all go take a flying leap as far as he's concerned.
Anyone else find it interesting how certain Dems in leadership positions (Kaine, BHO) are now coming to the realization that only sound fiscal policies can keep the ship from sinking? Let's pray the morons Pelosi & Reid have similar epiphanies.
epiphanies?
Bush and the republicans never had such epiphanies when they kept increasing the deficit and spending and increasing the size of gov't.
Attrition is a huge waste of manpower
Employee attrition is also a huge waste of manpower. It is labor intensive for managers to go through the recruitment and hiring process, and it is labor intensive for co-workers to train new workers. New workers require a minimum of six months of hand holding and at least a year to get up to speed. And then they are raided by federal or private employment. Can you blame them for leaving? The morale is good but money paramount to young workers starting a family. I suspect that many departments, including where I work, could cap the positions to a lower level if there weren’t always so many inexperienced workers needing attention.
Why shouldn't everyone
including state employees be required to fund their own retirement? It's their retirement. Defined benefit plans should have gone the way of the dinosaur, but because Government has the power of tax coercion, it's still around.
As for the argument that state employees are underpaid, is there a shortage of applications for job openings at the state level, are jobs going unfilled for lack of applicants? I don't believe that's the case. Compensation is only a short-term job satisfier, the other elements such as working conditions, coworkers' attitudes, and the job itself are much more important to retaining employees than basic wages.