The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
Construction of Norfolk's starter light-rail line is running as much as 41 percent over its original budget, and that has angry local leaders demanding an explanation from Hampton Roads Transit, which manages the project.
HRT officials said this week they need $38 million to $40 million more to finish the 7.4-mile transit system, which is just over 50 percent complete.
When construction started in October 2007, the budget was $232 million. That figure escalated to $288 million in December 2008.
The latest cost estimate is $326 million to $328 million, HRT President Michael Townes said. Officials said the complexities of building in old, downtown streets as well as project enhancements have driven up the cost.
As a result, light rail's opening date has been pushed back again. Originally set to open next month and later pushed to October 2010, it now will be delayed up to three more months - into the first part of 2011, Townes said.
Most Norfolk City Council members and elected leaders who make up HRT's governing board were not aware of the cost overruns and delays until they were contacted Friday by The Virginian-Pilot.
The issue came to light when the Commonwealth Transportation Board voted Thursday to spend an extra $20 million on the project. Already, the state is contributing $67.1 million. The federal share is $167.2 million and the city's is $53.7 million.
While the city is legally responsible for the other $18 million to $20 million, City Manager Regina V.K. Williams said the city and HRT are working to find federal money and other sources to fill the gap instead of dipping further into city coffers.
"We cannot put this cost back on the taxpayers," Vice Mayor Anthony L. Burfoot said. "We can't afford to do any more, and we're not going to raise taxes."
A number of elected leaders have been asking for light-rail budget updates, but said they either got no responses or inaccurate responses.
Virginia Beach Councilman Jim Wood, who chair s HRT's board, used the words "incensed" and "indignant" regarding the latest developments.
"I'm very disturbed by the quality of information received from HRT's senior staff and the lack of accurate information received from HRT senior staff," Wood said. "When every single meeting we have we're told we're on budget and on schedule when we're not, that's a major issue."
Norfolk Councilman Paul R. Riddick said, "We can't afford to have that kind of leadership. For them to go this far down the road and this much over budget, we've got to do some things over there to make a difference."
W. Randy Wright, the Norfolk city councilman who has shepherded the project, said, "I think people need to be held accountable for what has transpired, and I won't go any further than that."
Townes said he did not inform the board because he did not have solid numbers and because he was awaiting the Transportation Board's action first.
"We've been refining these numbers and we didn't have a number to give to the board - we still don't have an exact number to give to the board," he said.
Asked what's next, Wood said he has called a special meeting of the HRT board's executive committee to discuss "litigation issues and personnel issues."
Townes and Williams said a number of factors have contributed to the increased costs. Several aspects of the project have been enhanced, including safety and security elements, passenger stations, the design of the storage and maintenance building, park-and-ride lots and landscaping.
Additionally, the challenges of embedding tracks in the streets of downtown have proven costly, in terms of both money and time. A key issue has been relocating underground utilities and the delays that work has caused.
Earlier this month, the city hired transportation consultant Philip Shucet, former Virginia Department of Transportation commissioner, to assist with the project. He said the light-rail construction "is a very complex project in an urban area with a lot of contractors all working at the same time."
Shucet said his job is to try to remove complexities. One way he's doing that is renegotiating with contractors for price guarantees. He said that can make costs more predictable, and "you can stop focusing on the day-to-day minutiae of change orders and devote all your attention to delivering the contract."
Townes said that HRT recently hired a transit construction expert and a financial consultant.
"We at HRT understand that our business practices need to be revised," he said.
Townes noted that the original design of the light-rail project was "bare bones" to meet stringent criteria for federal money. He said the newest budget is close to the price tag HRT estimated several years ago before slashing more than $100 million in a "value engineering" exercise to reduce costs.
"Many of the elements removed have now been put back in the project," Townes said.
Even at the new price, Norfolk's project is still the cheapest per-mile of any light rail built this decade in the country, at about $44 million per mile.
The next closest is Charlotte at $48 million per mile. Others range from $55 million per mile in Portland, Ore., to $600 million per mile in Seattle, which included a tunnel.
Meanwhile, Wood said he worries about the fallout for possibly extending light rail into Virginia Beach, which is under study.
"The perception is going to be very negative by a number of our citizens, and frankly I can't blame them," he said. "If Virginia Beach goes forward with the project, we certainly will have learned a lot from the issues going on right now."
Pilot writer Harry Minium contributed to this story.
Debbie Messina, (757) 446-2588, debbie.messina@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Enough already - cut our loses and stop the waste
Folks, these development scams are a failure - and they reek of corruptions and deception. The time is now to end these wasteful political payoffs and get back to local governments doing what they are supposed to be doing - and getting out of the pockets of developers, bankers, and speculators looking to enrich themselves at the expense of the taxpayers. Folks, this $232M project is already over budget by at least $100M! Think about that - $100M is not a "budget over run", it is proof of lies that were used to con the feds out of hundreds of millions of tax dollars. Bernie Madoff would be so proud of the Mike Townes and those that volunteered to provide governing oversight to HRT - the failed TDCHR. TDCHR Chair Jim Wood and Vice-Chair randy Wright should do the honorable thing and resign from public office, and begin to pay back taxpayers for their failure to keep a close eye on the shenanigans at HRT.
No government project ever
No government project ever comes in on budget..... especially once people start changing the originally agreed upon design of the project. And I buy the complexity of dealing with old infrastructure downtown. BUT that said, it sure sounds like the City Council is playing deaf, dumb and blind. They may not have been informed by HRT management, but there had to be rumours floating around that the project was behind schedule and over budget. All these discussions that were going on did not happen in a vacuum. So the question is why didn't the city council REQUEST information. Request the HRT president to appear and give a status report. Even if he could not be specific in terms of numbers. Nope sounds like politicians covering their butts to me. It also sounds like HRT management was trying to hide information..... hoping what? That it would just go away? Time to knock some heads and get this sucka done.
Blame game liars 2!
And by the way, they knew when they lied to the media and I was standing right there that the Tide wasn't going to be completed when they told them. Media if I was you? Keep digging, that's your job!
The blame game
They Lied!! They've lied the whole time! They knew it was underbid! The people in the office have no idea what's happening in the field. The designers didn't know what was underground, there's a maze of utilities and obstructions that "oops, my bad" they didn't even account for. Ridiculous!! They don't even pay the contractors so don't blame them City of Norfolk! HRT did not know what they were getting into and now there trying to cover it up! They are making it look like there so surprised and it's the contractor's fault. That is wrong! This story will only get bigger as the lies come out. There are so many people on that job working really hard that have not even been paid for what they have done. I promise you there's alot more to this job that they don't want citizens to know.
Unreal
I still support the Tide, but sounds like HRT needs new leadership immediately. It's one thing to have cost overruns, it's another to be entirely unaware of them or (more likely) try to cover them up.
While the project and it's future expansion will benefit the area, it's colossal blunders like these that will further complicate getting people on board (pun intended).
Give it a break!
One reason why the project is over budget is because all the problems the construction crew run into underground while building. The designers who plan the project cannot foresee the problems the crews run into.To demonize the project before it is up and running is, for lack of a better word, stupid. Does anyone know when the metro(in Washington D.C)was built? it began small and was over budget and alot of people was against it. I bet the people who was against the metro are now riding it.
There's a shocker...
Gee I'm stunned--I may have to lay down. Anyone surprised by this?
For those who believe
That reporting this is naysaying by the pilot... WOW!!!!
The issue is not that the idea of Light rail is not good for community, it ultimately can be. The primary issue is 40% over budget. Pilot is clearly endorsing the green movement by standard of editorial so that does not wash.
The issue is that those in charge can not be held accountable. Randy Wright trying to position himself as a deputy dog and take himself out of the loop of responsibility? Hello!!!! If you are going to put yourself as the Light rail mass-iah you should at least keep yourself appraised of the situation in total. You sir are culpable from my view. So, the next step is to inquiry and it certainly seems that this is a subject the Pilot should shepherd to create some semblance of accountability. Finger pointing, no, simply due diligence. Citizens, you must show a pro-active stance for your community and press your elected officials if you are going to save any positivity or growth in Downtown and subsequent public project. Clearly by example of elected officials the track record is abysmal so change the tide, easy to say hard to do
awful
this just proves how awful this idea was from the begining. the city of norfolk has ripped apart the city for this light rail. in a few short years they will be again starting to rip the rail apart for some other hare brained idea.
the council just signs off on these things with no care and very poor research. and we have to pay for it with our jobs and the destroying of our city. i have not heard a postive thought about light rail from anyone i've talked to, and my job puts me in front of many many different types of people.
i used to love my city of Norfolk, but this is getting to much. we are spending all this money at a time when it should be spent in other ways.
this light rail will be the downfall of our city. thank the mayor for this one.
looks like we got fooled again Norfolk. the Mcarthur Mall and Nauticus has not performed like planned also. and we can add the light rail to it. i have been fighting against my family to stay here, but this one article has pushed me farther to thier side.
as someone said eariler, it;s too late now. however the city could just stop what there doing, clean it up a little and start on some other money wasting project, just like the
cont.
wasting money just like the Granby tower at the Federal Courthouse