77°
forecast

Old king coal shows its age

Posted to: Editorials Opinion

The owners of some of America’s oldest coal-fired power plants are finally starting to see the big, smudgy arcs of handwriting on the wall: It’s often more efficient to shut down aging burners than to try to make them clean.

One of North Carolina’s biggest utilities, Progress Energy, announced plans this month to mothball 11 coal-fired plants by 2017 and increase its use of natural gas, a cleaner-burning — but more expensive — fossil fuel. Officials said they view natural gas as a short-term bridge to nuclear power and renewable energy projects.

Others, including North Carolina’s Duke Energy and Pennsylvania’s Exelon, also are preparing to close older, dirtier coal plants.

Like Progress Energy, they’ve decided it’s a wiser course than trying to comply with stricter pollution controls and tougher limits on emissions of carbon dioxide, a leading contributor to global warming.

Last week, the EPA issued a long-anticipated final ruling that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases pose a threat to public health  and should be regulated under the Clean Air Act.

The move comes two years after the U.S. Supreme Court declared that the clean-air law applied to greenhouse gases as well as pollutants.

Coal  plants generate more than one-third of America’s carbon-dioxide pollution, contribute to smog and acid rain and release toxins  — including mercury, harmful to brain development.

More than two-thirds of carbon dioxide emissions from power plants are from facilities built before 1980, according to a recent report by Environment America, a coalition of advocacy groups covering two dozen states.

Some of the nation’s oldest plants, which lack modern scrubbers , date back to 1938. Two of the 50 oldest  are in Virginia — American Electric Power’s Glen Lyn plant, built in 1944 in Giles County, and Mirant’s Potomac River plant, built in 1946 in Alexandria.

 The White House announced this month that AEP and two other utilities will receive nearly $1 billion in stimulus money to retrofit coal-fired plants to capture and store carbon dioxide, a method that’s touted as “clean coal” technology. The facilities are in West Virginia, Texas and Alabama.

Dominion Virginia Power, meanwhile, is proceeding with plans for a new coal-fired plant in Wise County, and Old Dominion Electric Cooperative is seeking  permits for a coal-fired facility in Surry County. Both projects include emission controls more modern than others operating in the region.

The debate will continue over whether those controls are sufficient, whether carbon capture is a sound  solution and whether coal is where taxpayers and utility companies should be investing  research and development money.

But one point of contention, at long last, should be settled: It’s time to end the chokehold that aging coal-fired plants have held on numerous U.S. communities. The decision by Progress Energy to shut down those units is progress that should be emulated.  

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Additional handwriting on wall: higher energy costs

Very happy for the media and the green gusto people in getting their way as these coal-fired plants close and aren't replaced. Oh joy! oh rapture! More coal miners out of work and more ripple effect job-losses in their communities. Maybe they can get jobs making windmill turbines because that industry is apparently going to employ hundreds of thousands of people every month. (Yeah, right.) But what's blithely skipped over in your editorial is where the additional money is going to come from to purchase this "cleaner but more expensive" natural gas. And when demand for nat gas increases, it won't get cheaper. Who really pays for all this green feel-good? We do, consumers, in the form of higher fuel bills and costs for other goods produced by power. No skin off the noses of power companies; fuel prices are what they are and they'll get their price increases rubber-stamped by rate commissions. Then, they get to posture for PR opps "look at us" "we're going green" and "we're concerned about the environment." Big deal. The little guy gets it in the shorts again.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Editorials rss feed    Opinion rss feed   


Toolbox