74°
forecast

Letters to Editor - bLetters

We welcome your opinion on public issues, in either of two ways. You can submit a letter to the editor for possible publication in the printed edition. The Virginian-Pilot welcomes letters to the editor on all topics, although concise letters (150 words or less) on public issues will receive priority. Letters may be edited for length, style and clarity and writers are limited to one published letter every month. Please add your name, city, street address and daytime telephone number for confirmation.

The other way is to comment on the published letters in this blog. In this online forum, you can comment as much as you want by using the comment box at the end of each entry.

By e-mail: letters@pilotonline.com

By mail: Letters to the editor - P.O. Box 449 - Norfolk, VA 23501-0449

By fax: (757) 446-2051

Promise keepers

Re 'As the economy sank, state retirement payments soared' (front page, Dec. 6): The story presented an understandable explanation for part of the problems with the Virginia Retirement System. But readers were left to blame the victims as a solution.

 

State employees long ago were promised that if they worked for the state for most of their working lives, the state would ensure that they received a modest retirement until their death.

Over the decades, state, city and school employees have accepted lower wages because of their faith that the state would live up to the promise. But now the state wants to renegotiate its part of the bargain because for years it has failed to fully fund the retirement system. It has allowed schools and municipalities to make lower payments in exchange for receiving reductions in state funding. Years of not properly funding the retirement system have resulted in a need for much higher payments at a time when the state has severe economic problems. The members of the General Assembly have no one but themselves to blame for this situation.

For teachers, VRS is not a 'generous pension program.' Virginia teachers receive 51 percent of their average salary in retirement, ranking them 39th among the states.

Kentucky teachers receive 90 percent, North Carolina 54.6 percent.

In a state where salaries are already low (30th in the U.S.), adding a dismantled retirement benefit makes it even more difficult to hire and retain high-quality teachers.

Changes need to be made to the retirement system. But the first change that needs to be made is the General Assembly's committing to fully funding the retirement plan promised to all the workers covered by VRS.

Dominic Melito
Virginia Beach

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Retirement

Well Dominic, if you were a former state senator, or house member and got another gig within the state government, then you would get a great pension.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

Toolbox