©
By Michael Sluss
Virginia lawmakers would have to disclose income that they and their immediate families receive from state and local government agencies under legislation designed to strengthen the General Assembly's Conflicts of Interests Act.
The bill, sponsored by state Sen. Ralph Smith, R-Botetourt County, is one of several ethics-related measures likely to be filed in the aftermath of a scandal involving former Del. Phil Hamilton, R-Newport News.
Hamilton, a senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, lost his re-election bid this fall after revelations that he negotiated a $40,000-a-year job for himself at Old Dominion University in 2007 while also working to secure state startup funding for the university center that employed him. He resigned from the House before an ethics panel could complete an investigation of his actions.
Hamilton disclosed his ODU income on the statement of economic interests that House and Senate members must file with their respective clerks, but he had no legal requirement to do so.
Legislators must disclose sources of income that exceed $10,000 annually, but the law specifically excludes income that lawmakers and their immediate families earn from state and local government entities, such as public colleges. Some lawmakers disclose such income anyway, but others don't.
Smith said he can think of no justification for such an exemption and wants to do away with it. His bill would simply change the word "exclude" to "include" on the form telling lawmakers how to report income from state and local government.
"Hopefully this will benefit us all," Smith said Wednesday.
"If you are deriving income from state entities, this is not to take away your livelihood," he said. "It's telling the voters who put you there what you're doing, and they will be the ones who decide if that's acceptable."
Smith, a former Roanoke mayor, said the disclosure bill ( SB4) is one in a series of government transparency measures he intends to introduce in the 2010 session. Smith said he also plans to reintroduce a bill requiring the state budget to be posted online for 72 hours before lawmakers vote on it. An identical proposal was defeated in the 2009 session.
The repercussions from Hamilton's case will draw more attention to ethics issues in the upcoming session, said House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong, D-Henry County. Armstrong has indicated that he will push to make legislative ethics investigations open to the public. He also voiced support for Smith's bill.
"I think there is a feeling amongst the people that special interests control government and, as a result, I think we need to continue to work to make certain that's not the case here in Virginia," Armstrong said. "I don't think that Virginia's laws are as protective of the public's interests as they should be."

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo



I'd be surprised if this happened
This most likely won't happen.
I doubt our lawmakers will show us thier books honestly.
It would mean they might loose some questionable money or force them to get thier lobbies to break up contributions in $5,000 increments so it is under the radar.
Bravo for leading the initiative but there are too many greedy crooks in Richmond and D.C. that won't let thier little Paradise crumble.
Nice to know there are one or two that want and are willing to give full disclosure.
Wow...
Perhaps we finally have an Honest politician?!? Would be refreshing wouldn't it? Don't hold you breath on this one folks. There is a whole den of theives to get past. However, I applaud Mr. Smiths effort.
Full Disclosure
Full disclosure by all people who work for the citizens of the Commonwealth is what is needed. Where are the employees of the people from judges to street sweepers? There are too many loopholes through which a buck can be slipped.
When a person, male or female, files for divorce on the grounds of domestic violence, they are raped of their assets by the judges, further victimizing the victim in order to keep them quiet and controlled.
When an elderly person is in need of assistance to handle financial matters, that money, along with all their worldly assets are eaten up by the courts and the court appointed lawyers, and they are placed in homes where they die rather rapidly.
When CPS takes a child unlawfully and without cause and it is proved, the parents are charged as much as $2,000 per month for the care of the child, though the child was illegally taken.
Come on Virginia, clean up, not just the lawmakers, but those that are supposed to apply the law.