The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
After Robert lost his retail job in May, he spent his meager savings fast.
So in July, he began eating lunch daily at the Union Mission in Norfolk, joining the city's growing number of people who have come to rely on local social service agencies for food and shelter.
"I'm not homeless yet, but it's coming to a point where I'm going to be," he said. He's submitted more than 50 job applications and has now fallen behind on his rent, he said. In the past year, Norfolk and cities across the country have seen more people like Robert, people who have lost or are about to lose housing because of foreclosure or layoffs.
However, Norfolk's homeless population has grown faster than in any of the other two dozen cities surveyed in a national assessment of homelessness and hunger released Tuesday by the U.S. Conference of Mayors.
According to the report, from 2008 to 2009, Norfolk saw a 15 percent increase in its overall homeless population and a 32 percent increase in the number of people requesting emergency food assistance.
Agencies increased the amount of food they distributed by 7 percent - to more than 11 million pounds - but it still wasn't enough to meet demand.
A count of homeless individuals and families in January found 577 people in the city living in shelters or out on the streets - a number officials said has increased since then.
"The numbers are getting bigger and bigger and bigger," said Sarah Paige Ful-ler, Norfolk's director of the Office to End Homelessness. "And the longer the economy isn't rebounding, the more damage that's done."
She called the study a "wake-up call."
Norfolk was the only Hampton Roads city to be surveyed by the study, which asked 27 municipalities - including Boston, Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit and Miami - to self-report data.
In addition to seeing the greatest percentage increase of individuals who were homeless, Norfolk also recorded a 7 percent increase in homeless families.
The city has a waiting list of 164 families who need shelter, said Priscilla Monti, media corporate relations manager at ForKids, which operates transitional housing and two shelters in Norfolk and Suffolk. The agency is housing 42 families in its locations, she said.
"The need is the most we've ever seen... and the funding is the lowest," Monti said. "It's just tragic times right now."
At Union Mission, men sleep on the floor of the lobby and women have been lodged in offices or hotel rooms, spokeswoman Linda Jones said. The agency's shelters house nearly 300 people each night - up about 10 percent from last year, she said.
The population has also changed. There are more women and younger people becoming homeless, she said.
In the survey, city officials said the closing of the Ford truck assembly plant in 2007 affect ed local employment levels even before the national economy soured. Layoffs and underemployment increased the need for food and housing assistance.
In 2005, Norfolk unveiled a plan to end homelessness in 10 years, pledging to better coordinate efforts between agencies and to increase local funding.
Officials said the biggest concern in the coming year will be making sure they collect enough donations to aid people.
Union Mission has had to turn away volunteers for its food storage warehouse. Like most agencies, it has seen a significant drop in donations, Jones said.
The agency relies solely on private donations, which have declined 23 percent in 2009, she said.
Last year, the mission provided 2,500 boxes of food to families in need during the holidays, she said. This year, it has collected enough to put together only about 1,000 boxes so far.
Norfolk isn't the only city to see a rise in need. In Virginia Beach, food stamp applications spiked 44 percent, spokeswoman Carissa Frasca-Cutrell said. And although its homeless count in January showed a decrease in the city's population, phone calls requesting assistance have increased "tremendously," homeless policy and resources coordinator John Boylan said.
Many of the requests are from people who have had their jobs terminated or their hours cut, Fuller said. There is also a growing pool of tenants who paid their rent but lost housing when their landlord defaulted on the mortgage.
Both Boylan and Fuller said their cities had recently received stimulus money to aid residents before they lost their housing.
Virginia Beach will use its more than $1 million and Norfolk its $2 million to help those on the brink of homelessness pay utility bills or catch up on rent payments.
That money will supplement funding at many local agencies, Fuller said. But she and others are concerned that the money won't be enough to keep up with the demand.
For instance, in October, ForKids served the most people it ever had in its 20-year history.
"Do we all worry? Absolutely," Fuller said. "We're serving three times the number of people with a third of the money. It's a huge concern. What are we going to do next year?"
Pilot writer Judy Le contributed to this report.
Meghan Hoyer, (757) 446-2293, meghan.hoyer@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Not in the bible
"The Union Mission.
Submitted by Rerun50 on Wed, 12/09/2009 at 9:05 am.
What i admire about the Union Mission, Is that they believe this proverb. Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish and you feed him for a lifetime."
Actually,that isn't from the bible.
Much of the funding for
Much of the funding for Norfolk's plan to end homelessness has come from foundation grants, private funds. That there is only a 15% increase in numbers strikes me as a success. Better intake processes are helping to keep families from boomeranging back into the system.
Union Mission Accomplished
Thank goodness these folks will have a safer, un-haunted place to stay. That old building gives me the creeps...
http://tidewaterlog.blogspot.com/2009/12/mission-eerie-position.html
Norfolk's homeless vs. Train to nowhere
Anyone else get the feel that the funds for the 10 year plan to end homelessness went to the train to nowhere? I also wonder if the people who lost their jobs when Norfolk invaded Waterside are those that have added to the 15% higher rate. Fraim is closing places left and right, dumping money into a train no one wants and the homeless rates are at a record amount. Hmmmmm.
Homeless
The more you feed the pigeons, the more they come around. We didn't have many homeless back in the early 80's, just the same handful you would see sleeping in the same bushes or doorways. It wasn't until Norfolk started coddling and feeding them that they started to increase. Liberal unintended consequences of benevolent actions. Haven't the people around you on the beach said not to feed the seagulls because you'll just attract more and they'll crap on you? What's the difference??? Stop feeding them and they'll go away, period. The only citizens who will complain are those paid by the local gov't to feed these pigeons. Those jobs aren't necessary. Gee, just saved a chunk from the budget.
Where have you been?
I worked at the Norfolk Free Clinic in the 70's and early 80's
and there was no lack of homeless back then. Just because you
didn't see them doesn't mean they were not there. The folks that were
working to help people get back on their feet saw them and helped them.
Some people won't be happy until people are dying on the sidewalks like
this was a third world country.
No Picnic for rental property owner.
It's no picnic for rental property owners, who have tenants who can't pay or don't pay their rent. The city demands high real estate taxes. If you are even 1 day late there is a 10% penalty. The city dosen't say that sense the tenant didn't pay, don't worry about the taxes.
Black day care?
Black day care?
What do the Norfolk"officials" have to say about their spending?
"In 2005, Norfolk unveiled a plan to end homelessness in 10 years, pledging to better coordinate efforts between agencies and to increase local funding."
And the results are....?
I appreciate the story about the percentage increase in homelessness.
However, city officials must be asked hard questions about their spending for those homeless with my tax dollars.
That was not done is this report.
I'll be waiting for a follow up to Norfolk's lack of accomplishment to help the homeless with my money. And I do approve of the spending to help the homeless, as long as it can be shown to work.
Information deserves more investigation
Norfolk has always had the highest homeless population mostly because it has been easier to get assistance from more available sources than most of the surrounding cities.
To clear up an incorrect comment that nobody wants to be homeless. Sadly this is not true. There are a number of homeless that suffer from mental illness who have expressed their preference to remain on the streets. If you have volunteered at the NEST program you would know that.
What the newspaper failed to report (perhaps a continuation of their shadow support of the city council?) is that mayor Fraim had declared war on homeless with some ridiculous belief that we could completely eliminate it and what the taxpayers are paying ms. Fuller to basically accomplish nothing? The city would be better off just giving this money to the Union Mission who can do more than a bunch of over paid city employees.