The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
When work on the pricey Ashville Park subdivision stalled, Beach officials turned to the country's leading bond underwriter to finish the public infrastructure work.
Virginia Beach wasn't the only city to call in its insurance policy on a project by struggling local developer L.M. Sandler & Sons Inc.
Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. of America says that 10 bonds on L.M. Sandler developments already have been called in Maryland, North Carolina, South Carolina, and Virginia Beach.
Travelers could be on the hook for a total of 113 bonds, including those for New Port in Portsmouth and Sandler at Graystone and Belmont Park in Suffolk, totaling $49 million for unfinished work.
Travelers, which is based in Connecticut, has sued L.M. Sandler and owners Steve and Art Sandler in federal court in Norfolk.
Travelers is demanding that the Sandlers put up at least $21 million to cover the cost of this work, up and down the East Coast, according to court documents filed earlier this month.
Officials from Travelers declined to comment about the lawsuit. Representatives from Sandler did not return phone calls last week.
"L.M. Sandler has indicated that it disagrees with both the amount of collateral demanded and said collateral will be spent," according to court documents.
The Sandlers, who were one of the area's biggest developers and major philanthropists, have been struggling since the collapse of the housing market.
Banks have foreclosed on some of their developments and hired managers to take care of others.
The Sandlers also have sold a few of their developments.
Virginia Beach's Ashville Park was the site of a Home-arama and most of the first phase of the development with 21 homes complete. But the final touch-ups, such as broken curbs and gutters or cracked sidewalks, need to be fixed, said Charles Hassen of the city's planning department.
After trying to work with the Sandlers for several months, Virginia Beach notified Travelers in late October that it needed to pull down the $1.9 million surety bond.
"It was a matter that nothing was happening, and we weren't seeing a completion and the agreement time was up," Hassen said. "Our bottom line is that we want the improvements completed and done."
It was the first time the city had to call a surety since the early 1990s, and at that time it was for a much smaller project, Hassen said.
State law requires localities to have some sort of financial assurance to cover themselves if a developer can't finish a project.
Sometimes developers provide a letter of credit with a bank, and other times they put cash into escrow, Hassen said.
For larger projects, surety bonds are a popular option, since a developer may not want to tie up several millions of dollars on a worst-case scenario, Hassen said.
Virginia Beach's claim should not be jeopardized by Traveler's lawsuit, Hassen said.
"Our interest, in my mind, is secure," Hassen said.
That is likely the case, said Edward Gallagher, general counsel for The Surety & Fidelity Association of America, a trade association for companies that write surety bonds.
Travelers can't argue that it doesn't have to pay the bond because the developer has defaulted or is no longer in business, that's the reason for the bond, Gallagher said.
Travelers also is a large company, which generated $24 billion in revenue in 2008, according to its Web site.
"Travelers would be extremely unhappy if they had to pay $49 million, but they certainly could," Gallagher said.
"They're saying, 'We're not going to sit here and let you go out of business and leave us holding the bag.' "
Typically, when a bond is called, the developer has to offer some collateral and reimburse the underwriter, under the terms of the contract, Gallagher said.
But according to court documents, Travelers said it is concerned that the Sandlers are negotiating with the banks to settle their loans and won't have any money left to pay Travelers.
"The defendants may render themselves insolvent, all to the prejudice and irreparable harm of Travelers," the company alleges.
Travelers has asked the court to not only force the Sandlers to put up $21 million but also to stop them from selling any of their corporate and personal property until their obligation to Travelers is settled.
Deirdre Fernandes, (757) 222-5121, deirdre.fernandes@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo


The Sandlers could care less
The Sandlers could care less about the exploitation of our personal freedoms when creating their 25 year bulk billing annuities. Personally, I don't blame them for not caring---this is a vicious world we live in and you evolve or die. They found a kink in the system, lawyered it and made it profitable.
That being said, it doesn't change the fact that we (the affected buyers) feel a little sense of retribution. This is bitter-sweet payment for the endless hours we spent trying to secure our lost freedoms against a Multi-Billion dollar firm that said without saying, "We're rich, We're powerful, let's see how long you can litigate".
Art and Steve, I hope your families make it throught these rough times---as for your business, put the other foot in the coffin.
Lost the family fortune
Made a bunch if money selling there family company to lose it (Sandler Foods). Terrible. Wonder what it means for the "Sandler Center" the City hasn't recieved the money for last update?
Sandlers bad timing
I know the Sandler Family are good people. I know they have sold their homes and have lost so much this past year. They have given back so much to this community. They have been generous with their resources. Yes, they have lived the life of luxury, but have worked very hard for it. They were up to their elbows in debt, building new neighborhoods for virginia beach, when the market crashed. They took risk with their money, and investors money, and are now paying the price. I wish you well Sandler brothers!
Con artists for a living....
The Sandlers deserve to lose their homes and their fancy, over-indulgent lifestyles. Maybe if they sold off a couple of their Lamborghinis, hummers, private jets and villas in various places around the world they would have some money to pay their debts. Instead the people who've bought their homes have to bear with rising "association" fees on an ongoing basis to help the brothers keep some money in their pockets!! They have done nothing but con people! The quality of their houses are crap and they enter into 75 year long contracts on behalf of the people buying their homes. I wish you the worst, Sandler bothers!
I might add...
that these 75 year contracts were NOT disclosed to the homebuyers and as of yet, the Sandler company cannot produce copies of any agreements for said contracts that have been signed by residents...How's that for "earning" their money. Sounds like a scam to me!
How About We Get the Facts Right
1) The City loses no money nor pays any money out when they call the performance bond on Ashville Park. The developers (the Sandlers) bought that bond when they began the devlopment.
2) The Sandlers have, by most accounts, been model citizens and local businessmen. They spent $5M of their money to support the performing arts center, money I'm sure they wish they had back today. They are not the same guys that shoved their noses into the public trough at Towne Center, 31st Street, or around the new Pavillion.
3) The Sandlers made a fortune when the building business was good, and they simply got caught up in housing bust. The only difference is that they were caught to a massive extent. Rumor has it that they may owe as much as a billion dollars (when all the debts are counted), money they certainly don't have.
4) The fight between the Sandlers and Travelers is simply the case of an insurance company not wanting to pay a claim. Happens every day.
How about we cut our neighbors some slack...
LEXINGTON DEVELOPMENT IN VIRGINIA BEACH
The City of Virginia Beach needs to pay attention to Sandler's inaction at the Lexington Development in Virginia Beach too. Homeowners have lived here for three years and still don't have paved roads. It's immoral that Sandler would collect cash on our backs because of their exclusive agreement with the cable provider, Cox, but then sit on their hands and let the community suffer without completing the infrastructure. THE CITY SHOULD TAKE THE SANDLERS NAME OFF THE PERFORMING ARTS CENTER until the company meets its obligations with the citizens of VB rather than the wealthy theater patrons.
Remington Park
The comment above could be applied directly to the residents of Remington Park in Suffolk by changing the cable provider from "Cox" to "Charter". Road paving is still not finished in this development after 3 plus years. The Sandler brothers should be held accountable.
How...
do they continue to get away with doing this kind of stuff to development after development? Why is there no accountability?
fyi
According to the PILOT, the Sandlers, under a little "public pressure" recently paid off their debt for naming rights to the performing arts center. I can't recall if the deal was in perpetuity or a designated number of years.
Fortunes rise and fall according to economic conditions. I wish them well, unlike a lot of locally connected political/developer crooks who want us to pay to minimize their risk ala towne center, laskin road, on and on.