©
Lawmakers assemble in Richmond next Wednesday for two months of debate on spending - a grim task given the more than $3 billion hole in the state budget. Among those joining the General Assembly for the first time will be a Virginia Beach senator whose victory is a few hours old.
On Tuesday, two men, neither of whom has sought public office before, are on the ballot to replace Ken Stolle in the state Senate: Republican Jeff McWaters, Amerigroup Corp.'s founder, who easily won his party's nomination last month, and Democrat William Fleming, who owns a small technology business and filed to run at the last minute.
Fleming is undeniably a long shot. The district, which encompasses the easternmost sections of Virginia Beach, is overwhelmingly Republican, and Fleming has only a tiny percentage of McWaters' campaign money. As of Jan. 1, McWaters, who has contributed to conservative causes and Republican candidates for years, had raised $371,000 and lent his campaign another $450,000. Fleming had raised about $21,000, nearly all of that his own money.
Fleming, who holds a Ph.D. in physics, is earnest and public spirited but has little grasp of how to solve the state's transportation or budget problems. He's passionate about establishing free medical clinics for the poor. He advocates increasing the number of days public school is in session and raising teacher salaries a corresponding 11 percent. He wants basic health benefits for part-time teachers at community colleges.
Unfortunately, he doesn't know how he'd pay for any of that, much less find more than $3 billion to fill the gap in the budget.
McWaters, retired chief executive of Amerigroup, which employs 1,700 in Virginia Beach, has experience in recruiting businesses and reining in spending. Trained as an accountant and specializing in providing medical care for the poor, he would immediately be a go-to guy in the Senate as the state looks for ways to cut spending.
He understands the need to improve Virginia's roads to protect the ports, tourism and businesses and to allow safe evacuations during emergencies. He points out that his company's expansion plans were curtailed because of a poor transportation infrastructure, so transportation - along with creating jobs and making Medicaid and Medicare more efficient - would be his focus in Richmond.
Unlike Fleming, he supports the purchase of the Norfolk-Southern right of way along Virginia Beach Boulevard to preserve that corridor for future transit uses. In business and in his campaign, McWaters has shown the ability to ask the right questions and solve problems. He has the ear of the state's top leaders, and Stolle, now Virginia Beach's sheriff, has endorsed him.
McWaters offers voters the best chance for leadership in Richmond. They should send him.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
Bill Fleming is the best choice for Virginia and Virginia Beach
Given the two week campaign, it is ludicrous for the Pilot editorial writers to expect either candidate to come up with a budget plan that will do what the entire legislative branch is incapable of doing.
However, from comparing each candidate's websites, and talking to them at appearances, we can conclude that Mr. McWaters will back the McDonnell plan to return TOLL ROADS back to our existing Virginia roads (likely to include the VB-Norfolk Expressway).
Mr. Fleming will NOT support a return to tolls, but has pledged to work towards a bipartisan transportation solution.
When compared on an issue by issue basis, Bill Fleming provides the citizens with a brighter view of our future and provides initiatives that will move Virginia back onto the road to prosperity.
I thank Mr. McWaters for running, but Mr. Fleming simply has more forward-thinking proposals that constitute real solutions to the problems that we all face. I am convinced that Bill Fleming will be much more effective at getting Virginians back to work again, while Mr. McWaters will primarily be looking out for his health insurance company buddies.
Amazing what money can buy...
Fleming understands that transportation issues are due to political gridlock and require extraordinary cooperation to solve. Fleming also understands that the economic and budget issues we face will not be solved through the irresponsible investment in offshore drilling or the short sighted selling off of Virginia’s ABC stores. The paper claims McWaters will “be a go-to guy in the Senate as the state looks for ways to cut spending.” All of this is absolutely true. McWaters has a history of cutting expenses by making difficult decisions, like that of his company, Amerigroup, denying coverage to pregnant women in Illinois; a decision which cost his company $334 million in a lawsuit.
But Never In a close Election....(or a big one)
I have noticed over the years that the Pilot will endorse a Republican now and then. I have also noticed that they only do this when the Republican is so far out in front that he is practically guaranteed of winning and the Democrat hasn't a chance. This way they can claim that they too are "Fair and Balanced".
Got it
Whenever the Virginian-Pilot endorses a Democrat, this is evidence of liberal bias. Whenever the Virginian-Pilot endorses a Republican, this is also evidence of liberal bias.
Well
At least he has more sense than to think more welfare is an economic boon.
Huh?
What do you mean by "democratic operative?" I am a private citizen expressing my own personal opinions. I speak only for myself.
Unanswered questions
Who contributed $371,000 to McWaters and what do they expect in return?
The editorial states that Fleming doesn't know how he'd fill the $3 billion gap in the budget and fund transportation. Does McWaters know how to do it? What is his plan? Borrow billions of dollars? Cut education? Toll booths on 264? Fantasy revenues from offshore oil drilling?
Spoken like a true Liberial
David
In My opinion your statements are just so typical, They are right out of the playbook of Liberal Democrats. If your candidate doesn't have any answers of his own then you must attack your opponent for his answers. If you really want to know where Mcwaters stands, then why not go to his website www.jefferymcwaters.com and get his answers in his words not those of others. Now once again where does Fleming stand on filling the 3 million dollar gap in the budget? What is his Plan? Borrow billions of dollars? Cut education? Put the Toll booths back on 264? also do not automatically assume that the oil drilling revenue from drilling off our shores is a fantasy which is another Liberal environmental wacko stance which has no environmental truth to it.
Offshore Oil Drilling
One element of the McDonnell/McWaters plan to fund transportation needs is using state revenue from offshore oil drilling. For that to happen would require a whole series of unlikely events: approval from the Obama administration, development and approval of some kind of revenue sharing agreement with the state, reversal of opposition by the Navy, substantial oil discoveries, and development of pumping and storage infrastructure somewhere in onshore in Virginia Beach, all within the next four years of the McDonnell administration. That seems a bit unrealistic to me.
The editorial
attacked Fleming for not knowing how to close the budget gap but didn't say how McWaters would do it. That seemed to me a double standard.
I have been to McWaters’ website, where he advocates funding transportation, improving education, and cutting taxes. That just doesn’t add up.
McDonnell’s plan (which McWaters supports) includes reinstalling toll boots on 264. Is that really what Virginia Beach citizens want?