©
Congress is clearly capable of mucking up efforts to reform the country's health care system without assistance from state legislators in Virginia.
Nevertheless, some Virginia lawmakers feel they have a certain expertise in such fiascoes, if not in constitutional law, and they are compelled to share their talents with the rest of the nation.
It's no great shock to see the theatrically inclined Del. Bob Marshall sponsoring legislation that purports to exempt Virginians from any future federal requirement that they purchase health insurance. But it's a disappointment to see that reliably contemplative legislators have joined his effort, including Sen. Fred Quayle and Del. Harvey Morgan.
The measure has already passed a Senate committee with backing from two Democrats.
That initial success is encouraging similar states' rights rabble-rousing, including a bill to ban federal regulation of guns made and sold in Virginia.
The legislators pushing such measures have yet to pinpoint the section of the U.S. Constitution granting Americans the inalienable right to be violently ill, uninsured and armed to the teeth, but they are apparently certain it exists, and they're prepared to waste the entire winter session of the General Assembly defending it.
Perhaps while they're at it they'll waive existing requirements that motorists carry car insurance and pass a resolution encouraging parents to send their children to school with the whooping cough.
If Congress ever manages to pass a health care bill, court challenges are guaranteed.
Decades of jurisprudence have broadly construed the federal government's power to regulate interstate commerce, including the ability to impose mandatory minimum standards for health programs for the poor.
More recent actions by sitting justices on the U.S. Supreme Court suggest a desire to narrow that authority somewhat, but it's not at all clear that they would dramatically roll back federal rules for Medicaid, education or farming, for example.
Beyond that, the high court will eventually provide certain guidance. Virginia lawmakers will not resolve the matter, regardless of how long they pontificate or how many dubious laws they pass.
Every Virginian has reason to be concerned about the feckless manner in which health care reform has been handled on Capitol Hill. But state legislators who feel they could do a better job should run for Congress.
In the meantime, they've been sent to Richmond to repair a $4 billion gap in the state budget and pass economic policies that will create jobs in Virginia. If they can't handle the assignment at hand, they shouldn't expect a promotion.

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
VP Editorial Board
They don't know the difference between the functions of the federal and state govenrments. If congress has uncontrolled regulation of commerce, then there is no point in having a state legislature at all.
Constitutionality
Article 1 Section 8 of the Constitution lists specifically what Congress can do. The 10th Amendment further limits the Federal Government's efforts to expand. Health care is not listed. It is not the realm of Congress. Remember, the states created the Federal Government, not the other way around.
yeah that's what they want
The legislators pushing such measures have yet to pinpoint the section of the U.S. Constitution granting Americans the inalienable right to be violently ill, uninsured and armed to the teeth, but they are apparently certain it exists, and they're prepared to waste the entire winter session of the General Assembly defending it.
Umm, WHO's theatrically inclined? This argument might as well have been written by any number of knee-jerk partisan posters around here that have to resort to spin and distortions to make a point.
And, by the way, since the answer doesn't exist elsewhere I'd have to point you to the tenth amendment. I know, that pesky thing again?
Civis must not be an elective at J school.
You fail in your opinion essay to "pinpoint" exactly where in the Constitution it grants an inalienable right to low co-pays and irresponsible lifestyle choices. You fail to pinpoint which amendment grants you the right to have others taxed to pay for services that you don't value enough to pay for yourself by maybe sacrificing your Escalade and your big screen t.v. in order to purchase your own health care. Furthermore, where the Constitution does “pinpoint” your rights, you are willing to not only abrogate those rights but willfully deny their existence entirely. Surely this wouldn’t be so that a political agenda can be forced onto a defenseless citizenry unable to defend themselves against a tyrannical government.
It is sad that the opinion holder was so negligently educated while at J- school that he fails to understand that the constitution does "pinpoint" the 2nd amendment, the 9th amendment and the 10th amendment. Thank goodness, our forefathers had better foresight than current opinion makers and the ‘non-representative’ representatives currently, but not for long, serving in Congress.
concentrate
Our delegates nmeed to concentrate on the $4 Billion deficit and leave other matters alone, and stop wasting time. Will they? Heck no they won't. More than one session of the General Session have we seen nothing but a wast of time.
Abortion?
"legislators pushing such measures have yet to pinpoint the section of the U.S. Constitution granting Americans the inalienable right to be violently ill, uninsured and armed to the teeth"
It's right next to the part about 'right to an abortion'
Just because the Supreme
Just because the Supreme Court has leaned a certain way in the past doesn't make it right. The 10th Amendment is clear and I'm proud to see state lawmakers stand up and tell the Federal government that enough is enough!