Some question GOP's motives in panel picks

Posted to: News State Government

RICHMOND

Arlington Democratic Del. Bob Brink was dismayed to learn recently of his removal from the House Privileges and Elections Committee, which he had served on since 2002.

Although the Republican majority made other roster changes to reflect its November gains, that shift raised eyebrows because Brink was among a couple of white Democrats replaced on the committee by black legislators.

To some, it was a sign that House GOP leaders are stacking Privileges and Elections as redistricting approaches in 2011, a charge Republicans deny.

Legislative boundaries are redrawn every 10 years in Virginia following the latest population count. Those maps must gain approval from the General Assembly, the governor and federal authorities.

The addition of Hampton Roads Democratic Dels. Lionell Spruill Sr. of Chesapeake and Algie Howell Jr. of Norfolk doubled the African American representation on the panel, which plays a key role in redrawing the election maps. Spruill and Howell join Legislative Black Caucus Chairman Kenneth Alexander, a Democrat from Norfolk, and Del. Rosalyn Dance, D-Petersburg.

Brink believes the new committee alignment is about the "atmospherics" of having black legislators support the Republican redistricting plan, giving it "bona fides" when the U.S. Justice Department reviews it for Voting Rights Act compliance.

House Speaker Bill Howell, R-Stafford, denied that the appointments come with any expectation of loyalty to Republican interests during the debate over redistricting.

"Oh, heavens no," said Howell, who noted that he has a record of placing minority lawmakers on key committees, including four black legislators to Appropriations.

Alexander is willing to offer Republicans the benefit of the doubt.

"I think you have to consider that they are sincere in putting the best qualified legislators on committees they appoint," he said.

Norfolk Democratic activist Vivian Paige isn't convinced.

She views the relationship between black Democrats and House Republicans on redistricting as an "unholy alliance" that may preserve majority-minority districts but cannibalize other Democrats.

How districts are creatively crafted to protect incumbents and penalize opponents can be political gamesmanship at its finest or most duplicitous, depending on one's perspective.

"We all talk about good government and open government," said Del. Onzlee Ware, D-Roanoke. "But the truth is, we know that the party in power uses that as a tool to either strengthen their political power... or they use it to dilute districts so they can pick up other seats."

That's how it's been done for years. And that's how it's expected to occur next year, with House Republicans protecting their own and Senate Democrats doing the same, said Joe Stanley of the Virginia Interfaith Center for Public Policy.

The center advocates reforming the redistricting process to make it less political.

As of last week, the 18-member Black Caucus hadn't taken a position on redistricting, several members said. But despite support for the idea of reform from Gov. Bob McDonnell and numerous state senators, many House GOP officials remain opposed to it.

Del. Chris Jones, R-Suffolk, who carried the bill defining House boundaries in 2001, considers bipartisan redistricting a misnomer.

"There will always be politics involved in this process," he said. "And I don't think the commonwealth has suffered because of it."

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Republican voter suppression

Voter suppression is a proud Republican tradition. Expect to see a lot of it now that Pat Robertson McDonnell is in office.

suppression

Too bad it isn't as effective as all the dead people who vote Democratic in Illinois. Yup, them there poliitcs in Chicago are as pure as the driven snow they are.

HAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAA!

That is hilarious! Is this a nickelodeon introduction to the opposites sketch? LOL! Yeah, maybe you're right. Pat and Bob forced 344,614 more people to vote for McDonnel...or maybe the "suppression" they exerted resulted in 344,615 fewer people from being able to go out and cast their votes for...what was his name again? Deeds? Yeah, Deeds is the name. Go ahead and make mention that Gore got robbed in Florida while you're at it. Ahhh not close enough to make another "hanging chads" controversy is it? Maybe you should take a look at Senator Byrd of West Virginia and see what he believed as a young man and tell me which party is inclusive of people with race based "suppression"...

Wow! Two people dislike my reply...

Why don't you go ahead and debunk what I said instead of just giving me a thumbs down? That way we can have a nice dialogue and exchange of ideas! What I said is factually correct by the way...

you're going to be waiting a while if you want debate

There are a lot of people who aren't interested in debating issues. They'd rather hop on pilotonline, make inane comments and give other folks thumbs downs without explanation. They're the same ones who get bussed in to the polls and vote for whom they are told. As an example, exit polling after the last Presidential election showed a staggering numberof Obama voters didn't know his running mate was Joe Biden. Like her not (and I don't particularly), at least most Repbublican voters knew Sarah Palin was on the ballot.

And you polled

everyone of them? Please, this partisan sniping settles nothing. There is no requirement for voters to pass any type of civics test. Both side profit from the unknowledgable voting for them.

Im curious for the explination of how Mcdonnell or anyone

could stop voters. Does he stand at the doors to the voting places with guns saying "dems aint wanted?" Just how is that done? Maybe long time ago with voting taxes, etc a case was made for voter suppression, but today? I think not. While both sides would love for the other side's voting base to stay home, I don't see how McDonnell (or Kaine) is going to be able to suppress anyone from enjoying and participating in the ability to vote. You show your registered, you vote. You register, you vote. You show up at your polling place, you vote. I do not see any way that McDonnell stops that.
What I can see is McDonnell putting legislation in place that stops dead people from registering and voting, or those who do not live in the district from walking into the polling place and voting. If that is the voting suppression your talking about, good on Gov McDonnell. Dead people should not be voting, don't you agree? One live person, one vote at one designated location. That is not voter suppression, but voter registration integrity.

Legislature committees

Committee assignments are generally purely political with an occasional qualified individual. The Senate has done basically the same thing to Sen Wagner as the House did to Del Brink. It is just politics and if anyone doesn't think the Dems wouldn't do the same is only kidding themselves. This is why we need a non partisan redistricting process!

Keep politics out of redistricting

Can't we get a group of retired judges or some other non political group to handle redistricting after the census? Let's try to get voting districts to align with rational community boundaries and be mostly compact and logical?

Or possibly

even follow the Iowa model of redistricting. But then, redistricting to either party isn't about representation, it's all about power. Unfortunately our General Asembly does all it can to maintain power away from the people. Until we vote out all incumbents and elect people who will work for us and not the party we will never have true representation. The Howells and such like him will try to hold on as long as possible. It doesn't matter which party has dominance, they both act the same.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox