Va. officials upset by report that feds will delay sale of offshore oil leases

Posted to: News State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Some Virginia politicians reacted with dismay Wednesday to reports that the federal Department of the Interior plans to delay drilling off the commonwealth’s coastline for at least a year. 

Gov. Bob McDonnell said he would “strongly oppose” any delay on drilling beyond 2011. And U.S. Sens.  Mark Warner and Jim Webb sent a letter to Interior Secretary Ken Salazar urging him to move forward with the lease sale for an area off the Virginia coast for drilling “in a more expedited manner.”

Reuters news service reported Wednesday that an official with the department’s Minerals Management Service told an industry workshop last week that the lease sale will be put off until 2012, and could be delayed past that date.

The workshop was not open to the media. An agency spokeswoman, Eileen Angelico of Minerals Management Service, confirmed the comments to Reuters but said later that a decision had not yet been made to delay the drilling. She said Salazar was expected to make a decision soon.

McDonnell has used anticipated revenues from taxing offshore drilling as a key piece of his plan to raise money for transportation.

Last month, he wrote to Salazar urging him to move forward with the lease sale quickly. It had been tentatively scheduled for November 2011.

McDonnell said he remains “dead serious about trying to make Virginia the energy capital of the East Coast.”

“A big piece of that … is offshore production of oil, natural gas and wind,” he said. “We don’t need federal government delays; we need cooperation.”

Sen. Frank Wagner, R-Virginia Beach, has filed a bill that would require that 80 percent of tax revenue from offshore drilling or oil exploration  go into a transportation trust fund.

In their letter, Warner and Webb emphasized that  drilling could  bring jobs to Virginia and add to domestic energy production.

“Support among Virginia’s political leadership for the development of oil and gas resources is strong,” it read. “Therefore  it is understandable that recent media reports highlighting additional delays are a source of frustration to Virginia and to a nation that is looking to turn around the economy while simultaneously addressing energy security.”

The Minerals Management Service   estimates that  there could be 130 million barrels of oil and 1.14 trillion cubic feet of natural gas in the area that would be leased – some 3 million acres about 50 miles offshore.

President Barack Obama said earlier this year that he wants a comprehensive U.S. energy strategy  before moving forward with drilling off the Atlantic coast .

Opponents of  drilling have said it could affe ct the Navy’s training and damage the environment. Alicia Wittmeyer, (757) 222-5216, alicia.wittmeyer@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Big Oil Companies.............

I thought I heard that Big Oil ran DC. I guess not!

VA is owned by the coal

VA is owned by the coal lobby.

What it's really about

Just like the Dems going after Palin (their fear of the GOP claiming the first female Prez) this is merely about sabotaging a Repub's efforts to do something positive on the energy & jobs fronts.

not even close

Palin was criticized because she has poor control of English, she was ignorant of American foreign policy, she quit her job, she was hypocritical about choice/life issues, and she doesn't read.

This article is about the classic struggle of a state's right to self determination versus the people's right to control our resources. You can't simplify a complicated argument by mentioning a political hack's name But, nice try.

tough choices?

This must be one of those tough decisions about offshore drilling that Obama was talking about last night. Tough for those that support it.

Exxon Valdez

The 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill occurred as the oil tanker Exxon Valdez was leaving the terminal at Valdez full of oil. The spill occurred at Bligh Reef, about 40 km (25 miles) from Valdez. Although the oil did not reach Valdez, it destroyed much of the marine life in the surrounding area.

Wasn't the captain/pilot

Wasn't the captain/pilot drinking?

Double Hull.

Since then all new tankers built are required to be double hulled and eventually all tankers in US coastal waters also have to be.

so?

The exxon valdez wasn't an offshore oil rig, it was a tanker that was run aground by a drunk captain.

Do oppose shipping? Shipping oil? Using oil? What? Because I don't see a relationship between Hazelwood's drunken criminal acts and offhsore oil platforms.

How many oil platforms have been run aground?

We don't produce anymore

We don't produce our own energy, we don't grow most of our own food, we don't produce most of the durable goods here. These pursuits provide the best jobs, reduce unemployment, provide state/local revenue from sales and a stable tax base. Too many laws were created and pushed for special interest while the public suffered and businesses suffered. The technology to drill safely and responsibly is proven in the Gulf of Mexico. Rigs break free periodically during storms, yet there are no spills. Louisiana gets the benefit of drilling in the gulf, but Virginia can't drill off its coast. Instead wind generators, solar panels, and other future technologies are advocated. This is an issue where federal oversight is oppressive and in six months, Obama will be sitting in the oval office "mystified" why the unemployment rate stays in the double digits. He has no understanding of economics and capital markets. I thought Harvard provided a well rounded education to its graduates - except not in Obama's case.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners

special features