The Virginian-Pilot
©
NORFOLK
She isn't quite saying I told you so, but Del. Paula Miller says she warned city officials a year ago about "the runaway costs of light rail."
That alarm, she says, should still be heeded.
In November 2008, she wrote a letter to Mayor Paul Fraim and the City Council expressing concern about potential cost overruns. She urged them to appoint an independent panel of private business people to oversee light-rail construction.
"Unless we monitor construction costs now, we could be auditing the mistakes later," she wrote.
The council dismissed her request with little discussion. Fraim ardently defended the city in an exchange with Miller during a meeting with General Assembly members.
Now, however, at least three members of the City Council concede that Miller was right a year ago, and they are calling for an independent review of HRT's light-rail expenditures.
Last month, Hampton Roads Transit head Michael Townes informed the council that the latest cost overruns will be as much as $40 million. A day later, he told the HRT executive board that costs could rise by an additional $12 million.
That's on top of $56 million in cost overruns HRT officials announced a year ago. In all, the project could end up costing $340 million, or 47 percent over its original budget.
Although HRT officials hope to fill most of the gap with federal and state money, the city's taxpayers could be on the hook for more than $25 million. HRT is in charge of the project, but the city is responsible for all cost overruns.
Miller, a Democrat who represents northern Norfolk, said the city should have acted forcefully a year ago to claim oversight of the project.
HRT has said much of the overruns occurred because contractors were delayed, some more than 100 days, because utilities needed to be relocated. During the delays, construction workers and consultants continued to be paid.
"If we had an independent board, they would have been monitoring the change orders," Miller said. "The people at HRT knew about these overruns. You don't make change orders without knowing how much they cost."
City officials said they did not know about the overruns until Townes told them in mid-November. Townes said he informed city officials of the overruns as soon as he knew about them.
Councilmen Don Williams and Barclay C. Winn and Vice Mayor Anthony L. Burfoot all say an independent auditor needs to look at light-rail expenditures.
Williams, a former state delegate, said he believes the Auditor of Public Accounts, an arm of state government, might be the right agency. Miller said she will make such a request of the agency if the council asks.
"We need someone who has no interest in the project, other than finding the truth, to look at their books," Williams said.
Winn, who has criticized HRT more forcefully than anyone else on the council, said he regrets not embracing Miller's call for an independent panel and not speaking out more vociferously about his concerns.
"From day one, I was not pleased with the quality of the talent that we had on board to run that job," he said.
Councilmen W. Randy Wright and Paul R. Riddick, who serve on the HRT board, said they think the city should wait until AECOM, a consulting firm hired by HRT in November to analyze cost overruns, issues its report. Wright said AECOM officials will make a presentation at the next City Council meeting on Jan. 12.
"They've got a great national reputation," he said. "Let's see if their report answers our questions."
Councilwoman Daun S. Hester agreed, saying, "Where are they going to get the money from for another study?"
Hester, who opposes efforts by some HRT officials to fire Townes, said the fault lies with cost-cutting ordered by the city years ago after the original light-rail budget was deemed too costly. About $100 million was cut from the project, which was then supposed to be built for $232 million.
"We cut the project too much," she said. " Now we're back to the original budget."
Councilwoman Theresa Whibley declined comment on an outside audit. She said the city appears to have oversight on the project now that John Keifer, the city's director of public works, has been temporarily named the city's liaison for light rail. Moreover, the city hired transportation consultant Philip Shucet, former Virginia Department of Transportation commissioner, to help Keifer.
"I feel like we're finally doing what Paula asked us to do," she said.
Harry Minium, (757) 446-2371, harry.minium@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
The General Assembly created the TDCHR
Let's get this correct, a member of the General Assembly says the following about the TDCHR that the General Assembly created; ""We need someone who has no interest in the project, other than finding the truth, to look at their books," Williams said." Huh? Sooo, then what Del. Miller is admitting is that the all-appointed regional governing body called the TDCHR that was created by the General Assembly cannot be trusted to be objective and look at HRT's books? Wow! If this is the case, then why did the General Assembly create the TDCHR to provide oversight of HRT and to be responsible for lookingt at their books?
Developer Barrett spins his TOD myths
Mike Barrett continues to spin his TOD/Light Rail myths. He claims light rail is designed to go to the oceanfront and Town Center in Virginia Beach. Really? Hummm, I don't recall that being approved by the Virginia Beach City Council. Oh ... that's right, because it hasn't. I do recall Beach voters REJECTING that light rail project at the ballot box in 1999. I do recall that Mayor Sessoms promised to conduct a referendum BEFORE the City Council will vote on light rail and that he said he would honor the results of the referendum. I do recall that the Beach taxpayers will be stuck with millions of dollars of costs to subsidize the 10 mile light rail service should they agree to allow it to be built in our city. Mr. Barrett attacks me because I exposoe the deception and propaganda the TOD lobby is using to gain access to billions in tax funds for light rail and TOD subsidies. You see, it's a "dveloper thing", taxpayers wouldn't understand :)
Fuming
Greenmun fumes below because he got called out on the fact that he uses subsidized roads to get to and from work. Poor guy, he thought we was totally an individual who makes it on his own. Typical libertarian; takes all the public benefits and then denounces them. But let us be clear; light rail, as presently designed, will link the major employment centers from Sentara/EVMS, to downtown, to Harbor Park/NSU, to Military Circle, to Town Center, and thence to the VB Convention Center and the oceanfront. This is the greatest concentration of jobs and employment in our region, and since the I-264/64 project was cancelled ($300,000,000), it is simply unlikely that just this small portion of I-264 will even get improved next decade, much less this one. That is why Light Rail is needed now; it is the low cost option to add capacity in this corridor.
More horse squeeze!
Our esteemed developer writes "But let us be clear; light rail, as presently designed, will link the major employment centers from Sentara/EVMS, to downtown, to Harbor Park/NSU, to Military Circle, to Town Center, and thence to the VB Convention Center and the oceanfront. This is the greatest concentration of jobs and employment in our region" RUBBISH!
So....I guess Norfolk Naval Base, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, and Oceana have all packed up and moved elsewhere huh Mike? If this steel elephant was intended to reduce traffic along the I-264 corridor and link major employment centers, then light rail construction would have started at Gate 2 at NB Norfolk and expanded from there. Light rail as it stands now is a mismanaged SPSA type black hole that is intended to suck the checkbooks dry from the citizens of Norfolk, VB, and coming soon to any local government willing to snort the nose candy and drink the kool-aid.
There are
reasons for mass transit. But it will take $8 a gallon gas for us to clamor for it before we'll give up our McMansions in the distant suburbs. Without either a mass transit system or alternative cars the burbs will become ghost towns as people move closer to work. But until then, LRT is a failure and won't work here. Where LRT has worked also had a very busy and utilized bus system. Ours isn't. There is no clamoring for mass transit
Miss the point
The point is that this extension is not designed nor intended to get people out of McMansions and their Lexi, but to serve those who live and work near this I-264 corridor. It will work in conjunction with roads, busses, walking, and biking, not replace them. While mass transit systems around the country have found more riders because of gas price increases, the system as a whole does not have the capacity to accept everyone. This system links the major employers, cultural and sporting venues, medical complexes, and many multi family complexes to provide an alternative to using ones automobile. It is not either or, it is both.
What jobs along the old NS ROW?
Um, I don't have a job along the old Norfolk Southern rail line, do you? The largest places that people work are NOT what are being connected to any place where large numbers of people live. Further, $8 a gallon gas? Cars are going to become electric, so gas is not the issue - and if transit riders are made to pay what the service they want actually costs, roughly $8 a ticket to ride a 21 MPH (ave speed of the Tide) to ride 18 miles from downtown Norfolk to the Virginia Beach Convention Center, which is less expensive? A $16 round trip to travel a total of 36 miles a day/ Or the $8 for 1 gallon of gas to drive 36 miles? But - because people not using the light rail are being taxed to pay for 75% of the cost of each seat, people think "Wow - light rail is cheaper!". No, it is not cheaper - it is simply that someone else is paying for the light rail riders daily commute - why?
Left out the important stuff
Greenmun has a short memory; he told us on Pilot Online a few weeks ago that he had to leave his offices at Town Center because the rent was too high. So of course, now he has to commute to his new offices, presumably by using the interstate system and the tunnels, infrastructure that is highly subsidized by all of us. Funny how he neglects to provide any fair and balanced view, but that is the definition of an extremist. Fact is, the light rail system as proposed would link major employers from the Medical Complex at Colley and Brambleton through Downtown, past Harbor Park/Norfolk State University, to Town Center, through the Beach to the Oceanfront. This is the most highly developed corridor of major employers in our region, yet Greenmun denies that even he had a job along that corridor. Of course, he said he did, but that does not now fit his hysterical denunciation, do he left that out.
On Crack ?
Huh? Mike, you admit that you know I don't work at Town Center anymore and now attack me because I told the truth? What? You're so funny and twisted! But, let's examine what Mike wrote, shall we? he basically states this boondoggle is meant to serve "the Medical Complex at Colley and Brambleton" as the major employer. Okay - let's run with that, shall we? Okay - then clearly we need to have the "the Medical Complex at Colley and Brambleton" pay higher taxes to pay back the taxpayers for this massively expensive train to nowhere. So, how much more taxes are the folks that own "the Medical Complex at Colley and Brambleton" now paying for this massively taxpayer subsidized amenity for THEIR workforce? Oh .. that's right - NOTHING.
I do not mind TOD (Transit
I do not mind TOD (Transit Oriented Development) Because I love walking, and people who love walking but hate transit may still like TOD'S. But a TOD has to be done right, and for that we have to look to other cities, not Portland (Oregon) or Norfolk, to accomplish it the right way. I kind of like what Dallas is doing. or orienting it just around a commuter lot. A TOD does not have to be oriented around a train line or a bus line, just a commuter lot would do.
I think they sprouted up around the old stagecoach stops of yesteryear, and were quite a convenience.
Today, a TOD is still super convenient, and only has to be built around a community that enjoys walking a couple of blocks to achieve its goals.