The Virginian-Pilot
©
RICHMOND
Virginia would become the only state without an arts commission if legislators approve a House of Delegates proposal to do away with the grant-making body in mid-2011.
"That's a big piece of our budget," said Keith Stava, managing director of the Virginia Stage Company in Norfolk. This year the group, which has a $2.6 million budget, received nearly $100,000 from the Virginia Commission for the Arts. "It'll be incredibly difficult to replace it."
"Everyone is very worried," said Pat Rublein, executive director of the Cultural Alliance of Greater Hampton Roads. She received numerous e-mails and phone calls Tuesday from arts supporters seeking advice on how to influence legislators to save the commission.
Virginians for the Arts contacted arts groups on Monday about Sunday's vote by a House committee. The statewide lobbying group sent out another e-mail Tuesday prodding culture fans to swarm the General Assembly on Thursday, when the budget measures are expected to come up for a full vote in both houses.
The commission this year is handing out about $3.9 million in state grant money plus $1 million in federal money to 700 recipients. If the commission disbands, the federal money will be lost, said Executive Director Peggy Baggett. Hampton Roads groups receive about 20 percent of the commission's funds each year.
The state spent a total of $4.4 million on the commission this year, including administrative expenses.
While the individual grants are relatively modest in relation to many arts groups' budgets, the grants help leverage cash from other sources, Baggett said.
The largest individual grant this year is $95,625, for each of the state's 19 major arts organizations, Baggett said. Local groups that received that sum were the stage company, Virginia Opera, Virginia Symphony Orchestra, Virginia Arts Festival and the Chrysler Museum of Art.
Arts managers said the loss comes at a time when budgets already have been slashed because of the economy.
"We have been preparing ourselves for the loss of government funding," said Gus Stuhlreyer, general director of the opera, "but this is going a lot further than we had envisioned."
Rublein argued that funding the arts is good business. In January 2009, Hampton Roads had 2,851 arts-related businesses that employed 15,288 people, according to figures gleaned from data compiled by Americans for the Arts, a lobbying group.
Alan Albert, legislative counsel and a paid lobbyist for Virginians for the Arts, said the House's budget package includes increases for certain tourism initiatives as it cuts the arts commission. "But one of the principal reasons tourists come from out of town and out of state is for arts attractions," Albert said.
Last spring, the Virginia Arts Festival drew 20,000 patrons from outside the area, including 41 states, said Scott Jackson, general manager. That was 25 percent of its total attendance.
From audience surveys, Jackson said, the arts fest has determined that those visitors "contribute about $10 million each year to the Hampton Roads economy."
"Those people are staying in our hotels, eating in our restaurants, paying to park, paying admission taxes. Also, people who travel for cultural events historically spend more and stay longer," Jackson said.
The Senate Finance Committee voted Sunday to go with then-Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's proposal in his final budget to maintain the commission's current funding.
The commission's budget was already cut by 30 percent in the past two years, Baggett said.
The House Appropriations Committee voted to slice funding in half for 2010- 11, then kill the organization as of July 1, 2011.
Del. Chris Jones, R-Suffolk, a member of the committee, said the decision was painful. "We spent many hours deliberating the cuts we made," he said, but in the end the panel decided that core services such as education, health and public safety had to come first.
The arts commission, "while it's been in the budget for some time," Jones said, "was not, in the minds of the committee, a core function of government."
That will be a recurring theme as the legislature completes work on the budget in the coming weeks, Jones said: "You can't cut $4.3 billion out of a budget and not have almost every function of government affected."
Virginia ranks 34th among states in per-capita spending on the arts, allocating 51 cents per person, Baggett said.
Maryland ranks four th and spends $2.36 per person. North Carolina, at 20th place, spends 89 cents per person.
Baggett, who has held her job for 30 years, said this was the first time one of the financial committees had recommended closing down the commission. In the early 1990s, Gov. L. Douglas Wilder proposed its elimination, but his recommendation was voted down by the legislators, Baggett said.
"This is really as bad as we've ever seen it," she said.
Pilot writer Bill Sizemore contributed to this report.
Teresa Annas, (757) 446-2485, teresa.annas@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo




Our ignorance is showing
It saddens me to read this thread. It perpetuates the stereotype that Southerners are ignorant. The arts are more than "giving" money to painters at the Boardwalk Art Show. That is not where the grant monies go. One more time, ignorant people vocalize their uninformed opinions. Research how the money is spent before spewing condemnations. My groceries or art? It isn't a choice. It's a lame attempt at a poor analogy.
When businesses are looking to relocate, the number one consideration is quality of life. (No it is NOT tax incentives) Are there sports teams? Theater? Symphony? Ballet? Opera? Without the VA Arts Commission we stand to lose our NEA grants in addition to our state contributions. Chrysler Hall/Scope bring in more to our local economy than any other venues. Just ask the surrounding hotels and restaurants how well they do on performance nights. Our claim to fame will be the only state without an arts commission. We need to replace our signs at the borders, "Welcome to Virginia, please set your watch back 25 years."
I'll gladly support the arts.
The Arts are a multi-billion dollar industry that contribute far more to society and the economy than they ever receive in funding or support--about $166.2 billion every year across this country. For every one dollar invested in the arts, a business receives anywhere from $7-9 dollars on return for their investment. Arts and culture are responsible for more tourism than any other draw. Nothing operates in a vacuum, especially not the arts. Patrons who attend art attractions spend money in local restaurants, hotels, and other spending which in turn generates TIFF funds that are used to fund necessary programs for the citizens of those areas. The City of Virginia Beach just did a study that indicated that $56.8 million in economic activity and 1,411 jobs are generated annually by the Non-profit Arts & Culture Industry in their city ALONE.
Many areas that have been
Many areas that have been historically depressed economically have found that investing in the arts and culture in their areas have been a means to revitalizing their economy unlike any other. The arts contributes to taxes as well. Again, in Virginia Beach, 2.3 million in local government tax revenues is generated annually as well as 3.6 million in state government tax revenues. That's in ONE city. The State only spent $4.4 million on the arts last year. Yet, they received over 80% back of what was spent from one city alone! Scientifically the arts are proven to enhance skills that are necessary to careers such as engineering, architecture, and physics. Children who are exposed to the arts from an early age have significant developmental advantages over underprivileged children who do not.
Employers benefit from
Employers benefit from hiring individuals who have significant experience in the arts as not only are those people more likely to think creatively and out of the box, they are also used to operating on small shoe-string budgets. Cutting out the Virginia Commission for the Arts would do far more irreperable harm than it would save anything. Continue to cut art funding? Sure, then don't be surprised when taxes go up anyway because of increased unemployment--not just of those "starving artists" but of the other businesses (including some of yours maybe) that are dependent upon their spending.
"Pat Rublein, executive
"Pat Rublein, executive director of the Cultural Alliance of Greater Hampton Roads. She received numerous e-mails and phone calls Tuesday from arts supporters seeking advice on how to influence legislators to save the commission"___ I wonder how much Pat Rubelin, a lobbyist for the arts, makes a year????????
Elitists and their hobbies
Please, if you enjoy the opera, theater or symphony then go and YOU PAY for it! I and others should not be FORCED to SUBSIDIZE your desire to feign culture. If the MAJORITY of people wanted the "arts" then it would be like other businesses, in demand and able to support itself. Can you imagine Washington of Jefferson TAKING money from the masses so a small faction can enjoy a show?????? The country is so out of control with pet projects and interests (many designed to give cronies and relatives jobs) it's ridiculous!
"Virginia ranks 34th among
"Virginia ranks 34th among states in per-capita spending on the arts, allocating 51 cents per person, Baggett said."
How many people are in your family? If you're married with the requisite 2.5 kids, then the State took exactly $2.30 last year, from your family, in order to fund the arts.
That's less than a box of cereal--for the ENTIRE year.
No one in the Arts is getting rich off of 51 cents a year.
Maybe if those who work in corporations, especially those on Wall Street, where capable of running their businesses on the lean, shoe-string, budgets most NON-PROFIT Arts groups are, we wouldn't be in such an economic downturn in ths country.
paint some nice ducks or ponies and people would buy it
Owls and old barns are popular too.
something has to be cut
In a tough budget year you have to cut something. Art is clearly nice to have--police, fire, EMS, schools are not. This is the kind of thing that if a community wants they can donate to it--just like the Boy/Girl Scouts.
If you want art--get out your checkbook.
How much do their "paid"
How much do their "paid" lobbyist's making? if there is no reason to lobby maybe they could spend that money on the arts. When we can afford it yea im sure we could spare some money for the arts but when schools and other needed services are being cut then you have to prioritize and im sorry but school lunches rank just a little bit higher than a night at an art show. Its another one of those nice to have things that we just cant afford but everyone that is getting cut from the budget just wants it to be taken from somewhere else. When all these art patrons that are so upset have a choice of buying groceries or going to one of their art shows and buying a painting what do you think they are going to buy,but when it comes to the state deciding its time to get all the lobbyists together and add another 3 or 4 million to the budget. This just doesn't go for the arts it goes for every non essential service out there. Art is part of education or it should be and that part should be funded but for actors, and painters,and the like, im sorry, times are tough, think outside the box and replace your funding, i dont know maybe get a job at that Golden Corral you detest so much, maybe then yo