73°
forecast

Beach family goes it alone in suit over Chinese drywall

Posted to: Business Realty News

VIRGINIA BEACH

Ben Proto is mad. He's mad at his builder. Mad at his insurance company. Mad at his bank.

Proto, like hundreds of homeowners, has a home built with tainted Chinese-made drywall. The gases released by the drywall have damaged his electrical appliances and led him to move his family out of the home.

Unlike many of those home-owners who've added their names to the class-action lawsuit, Proto has gone at it alone, spending the past year negotiating with builders, lenders and insurance companies to get the home fixed.

So far, none of the companies that helped usher the Protos into their home has come to their aid. All have pointed the finger elsewhere.

"If I put a defective screw in someone, I would take care of them," said Proto, a podiatrist. "I wouldn't just be like, 'Oh, you'll have to talk to the manufacturer about that.' "

It started with the builder.

During the early weeks of 2009, the couple went to their builder, A.R. "Rick" Gregor of The Futura Group LLC. He said he would take care of the problem, Proto said. Gregor also offered to help find the Protos another place while a remediation was being done.

Gregor declined to comment for this article but confirmed in an interview last year that he was working with the family and intended to fix their house.

Then came the insurance company.

The couple filed a claim over the drywall with their home insurer, Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Co., on March 11. It was denied on March 12. The insurer has argued that the home-owner's policy does not cover defective products or pollutants.

The couple pressed on, contacting Sam Porter, whose Venture Supply Inc. had imported the drywall. Porter reassured the couple, saying his company's commercial liability insurance would probably cover the drywall, Proto said.

But Porter's insurer had a different response. When Proto called Hanover Insurance Co., a representative told him to take it up with his builder.

Frustrated and still waiting for answers, the Protos in April filed suit in Virginia Beach Circuit Court seeking $660,000 to, among other things, remediate the home and pay for living expenses while the family was dislocated. The couple named in the suit Futura Group, one of Futura's subcontractors, Venture Supply, and Metropolitan Insurance.

Realizing it could be months or years before their case is settled, the couple began looking for a home to rent. They talked briefly with the builder about living in one of his vacant condos in Sandbridge. When nothing materialized by September, the Protos rented a home nearby in their Chesapeake Beach neighborhood, and Ben Proto decided that if he wanted his home fixed, he'd have to do it himself.

To do that, the couple would need a loan for about $250,000. The Protos had already contacted their mortgage lender, Wells Fargo Bank, over the summer to ask for assistance. After months of calling and filling out paperwork, Proto said the lender offered a three-month forbearance.

Next he turned to TowneBank, which had given the Protos a home equity line of credit. The bank also turned them down. Then, after learning that the home was built with Chinese-made drywall, the bank rescinded their remaining $50,000 in available credit, Proto said.

"Without so much as a phone call we had the rug pulled out right from under us," Proto said.

Finally in December, the couple met with Monarch Bank, which offered the Protos a loan to fix their house. In a few weeks, crews will arrive to start ripping down drywall, pulling out wires, replacing fixtures and floors.

The couple hope to move back in with their two children by June and that their lawsuit will result in money to at least allow them to pay off the loans and compensate them for a year of frustration.

"I could have walked away from this house, let it go into foreclosure," Proto said, standing in the home's kitchen last week. "There's no reward for trying to do the right thing. You buy something you can afford. You pay your mortgage. But when something goes wrong, you're left holding the bag."

Josh Brown, (757) 446-2318, josh.brown@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Doing the right thing

I sympathize with the Proto family and understand their frustration over the blame dodging and finger pointing. It seems that in this case no one was willing to do the right thing except, perhaps, the Proto family. I would disagree with his final analysis of the situation however. He stated that there's no reward for doing the right thing. Ultimately doing the right thing is its own reward. This family will have their home and the satisfaction of knowing that nothing was given, but rather, all was earned. They, far more than the builders, importers, insurance companies, and other blame dodgers are to be highly commended. It's this determination and spirit that built our nation, won wars, and made us great in the eyes of the world. The Protos are an example that many would do well to follow.

Towne

Another case of Towne's advertisements (We've got money to lend!) and their actions (*arrogant* denial of loans) not matching. But yanking the borrower's line when finding out about the drywall?? I'm even surprised TOWNE did that.

Hat's off to Monarch for helping out - and likely making a reasonable profit on a fairly low-risk (considering the borrower's occupation) as a result. That's how it's supposed to work.

TowneBank

Well, at least TowneBank is standing by their "members". Wait, they denied the loan and then reduced the previously approved credit limit? Hometown banking at it's best.

Smart Bank

I personally would withdraw my money from a bank that did not act prudently like this one did. How many of you know that your bank can (usually - read the agreement) restrict your equity line if your equity drops? That is, if I buy a home for $100, and take out another $100 equity line on a $250 home, but do not use it, I have $200 in available credit on a $250 home. If the home's value drops to $175, should the bank still honor the $100 equity line and let me borrow the $100? Heck no - that would put me at $200 in debt on a home now valued at $175. Is that the kind of decision making you want from the bank that holds YOUR money? Not me. I prefer a bank that chooses to remain solvent through wise lending practices, thank you very much.

If a bank issues a loan, it

If a bank issues a loan, it needs collateral, in case of default. The house is defective, and probably purchased in the over heated market, so at the end of the day, it's a bad decision on the banks part to lend money. Not so long ago they'd misrate (lie) the loans and pass them off to investors, so the banks wouldn't loose when the garbage blew up. But without that mechanism in place, they have to do real due diligence. If banks were always that prudent, then the housing bubble wouldn't of happened and the rush to fill orders before the mania stopped wouldn't have happened, and then China wouldn't have been supplying wall board.

Neat! Maybe it is the banks fault! They're the ones that gave out too much money that caused the "gonna get rich" housing mania that caused the building supply shortage that drove the demand for defective wall board.

give it up

For what they've probably spent on rent, they could have had the house redone in a week.

Instead of wanting to fix these kinds

of problems at the expense of the taxpayer, as certain-to-be-looking-for-new employment-come-next-election Sens. Webb & Warner recently proposed, it is just this kind that he & the rest of Congress could be working on: identifying which entity properly bears responsibility, then passing immediate & retroactive legislation to ensure the affected homeowners are made whole.
Some might argue there are bigger fish to fry than addressing a relatively small problem & perhaps they're right, but if Congress has enough time on their hands to debate the merits of a BCS football playoff system, they've got enough time to deal with this.
'Course the real solution is to demand relief & correction from the Chicom mfg's themselves, but given how much China "owns" us anymore our leaders will never find the guts.

Strategic Default. Let it go

Strategic Default. Let it go into foreclosure. But the US needs a database of Chinese drywall tainted homes, to prevent banks from reselling the poison to new customers.

What about suing the company in China? Over there when someone embarrasses them, they cut off heads.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Business rss feed    Realty News rss feed   



Toolbox