The Virginian-Pilot
©
VIRGINIA BEACH
Since the early '90s, some convicted nonviolent offenders have had the opportunity to serve their jail time from home and continue working.
GPS-enabled bracelets made the Electronic Home Monitoring and Work Release programs possible. More importantly, criminal defense attorneys say the programs allowed people to be punished for their crimes while still contributing to society, keeping their homes and providing for their families.
But after the state's $4.2 billion budget shortfall, Virginia Beach Sheriff Ken Stolle ended the two programs last month. With nearly $6 million in budget cuts on the table for the Sheriff's Office, Stolle said he could no longer justify the programs' roughly $120,000 annual cost.
Finding ways to save money has been Stolle's principal task since he took office Jan. 1. He has said his goal is to avert layoffs and avoid compromising jail or court security when the General Assembly hands down its final budget reductions in March. The cuts could reach roughly $5.7 million over two years, or 7.7 percent of the Sheriff Office's $37 million annual budget.
If that happens, 60 to 90 deputies could lose their jobs if savings aren't found elsewhere, Stolle said. Sheriffs and police chiefs around the commonwealth have also said that state cuts will cost jobs and service reductions in their departments.
Stolle has frozen vacant positions and commissioned a systemwide audit of the Sheriff's Office. He ha s also notified all of the office's vendors that he is reviewing their contracts and may look to terminate or re negotiate them. Contracts under review include those for the jail's food and medical services, he said.
Operating the jail is the office's biggest expense, besides providing court security, serving civil papers and offering community programs, such as drug education in schools.
The city supplements the sheriff's budget, and may also make cuts this year. Officials have proposed ending the deputy-run Drug Abuse Resistance Education, or DARE, program.
"I don't think the public would support cutting DARE," Stolle said.
When the Electronic Home Monitoring and Work Release programs ended last month, 14 people were participating, Stolle said. Most were given credit for the time they served and released. One returned to prison and one to jail. About 20 people participated last year, he said.
Other local sheriff's offices have also reduced or eliminated their own prisoner early-release programs, including Chesapeake, Stolle said.
"The decision was very simple," he said. "I've got millions of dollars of cuts I have to make and this program, although it has some benefits, it doesn't outweigh other security interests and concerns that I have."
Several criminal defense attorneys lamented the programs' end.
"It's really unfortunate that any aspect of criminal justice services has fallen victim to budget cuts," said attorney Bob Morecock. "I think people can do a lot and can have a much more positive experience when they can give back to the community or work, as opposed to sitting in jail."
The Sheriff's Office only offered Electronic Home Monitoring or Work Release to inmates when mandated by the court, Stolle said.
For those given the opportunity, the programs helped prevent their families from becoming victims as well, attorney Mark Del Duca said.
"Obviously he has to deal with a lot of budget constraints, and I understand his position," Del Duca said of Stolle. But "it is a great program and hopefully will come back again."
Kathy Adams, (757) 222-5155, kathy.adams@pilotonline.com

Delicious
Digg
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
Google
Yahoo
More on Alcohol Monitoring/Home Electronic Monitoring
To get accurate and reliable information on Alcohol Monitoring (AM) and Home Electronic Monitoring (HEM)in the Tidewater area go to www.alcoholmonitoring.com. A number of postings have referred to this service which is being used in the Tidewater Area, primarily by Virginia Beach and Chesapeake courts. It is now expanding into Portsmouth and Norfolk.
The system started in late March 2009 in Chesapeake and in April 2009 in Virginia Beach. To date 79 DUI offenders, underage alcohol possessors, spousal abusers, alcohol-driven accused sex offenders and other non-violent persons have been placed on the system. 46 of them are no longer on the system as they have completed the program, had their cases adjudicated or have been sent back to jail for violations. Twelve (12) persons are in this latter category. It is used for pretrial and presentence bonds, in conjunction with post-conviction sentences and for probation purposes.
The time in the system has ranged from 6 days to two (2) years. The average time on the system is 85 days. The wearers of our ankle bracelet and HEM pay for the cost of the system. A failure to pay these costs is a violation and can send the non-payer b
MONEY HUNGRY
It's called lining his own pocket with money. The more inmates in jail, the more money he gets from the state and tax payers. The ones who are on work release actually make money and pay to stay in the jail, they require less supervision and are considered non-violent. Instead of home monitoring or work release, why dont you just put them on supervised probation, if they are eligible for home monitoring or work release then they dont really need to be in jail at all. MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! That is all it boils down to. Let's pack them in as much as we can, the jails are overcrowded as it is, which in turn requires more deputies,more staff which requires more money. Come on, get your head out of the clouds. I think he is making a big mistake and will regret it come next election
"a big mistake"?
Could it be a budget game? Deliberately increasing costs makes that much more rationalization for needing more money.
Campaign Workers
Several readers missed the most important part of the Sheriff's statement: his main goal is not to save money but to keep all his deputies employed. If the Sheriff reduces the inmate census, he's got to lay-off those campaign workers.
Get rid of all the programs
If they have cut the money the Sheriff is 100% correct in what he is doing. It hardly matters if we think it is right or wrong. He runs that service and it is his job to cut and save where he feels he should. If it is not right then he will be held accountable. For those of you who dont want to sit in jail because the conditions are horrible then it is simple, dont do anything that will wind you up in there. I think you already knew what jail was like before you committed your crime but that apparently didnt stop you. You just didnt think you would get caught, but you did, so deal with the punishment. Dont cry now because you wont be able to go home and stay in the luxury of your cushy house. By the way, if you are awaiting sentencing then you have been caught more than one time!
So, in essence, you think
So, in essence, you think the Sheriff is right in what he is doing, but "it hardly matters" what you think about it? I disagree. I believe your thoughts do matter and I will defend your right to express them.
I concur, But do we listen
I concur, But do we listen everytime they tell us this will be the best for the citizens this week and then they change their mind again in two weeks. Do they Know?
Stolle's decision
It seems to me that we should be hearing more from our judges in the Va. Beach courts. I cannot imagine that sort of decision being made without consulting with those who try these types of cases in their court. It seems to me they are being less and less allowed to make good decisions for those defendants appearing before them.
Options that work in the best interest of all should not be discarded.
There is nothing that I know of that should not allow a judge to consider all options proposed to him/her. All cases are different.
We come before a judge for him/her to listen, think, consider, counsel,
without their hands tied by politics, lobbyists, and other constraints.
Are "we the people" losing faith in our democratic system of government to machines that disable our honorable and trusted judges ?
Doesn't Pass the Smell Test
From a purely financial perspective this doesn't pass the smell test. Housing these "non-violent" inmates in jail can't be cheaper than $120k for this program. I'm not debating what "non-violent is, just the cost. There is some other hidden agenda.
Jail & TV
"He says if 40 guys are in there watching a football game, just one deputy can keep an eye on 'em. But if they're spread all across the jail, in cells, rec area, showers, etc., it takes six."
If it's a Redskin game it would fall under "cruel and unusual punishment"