McDonnell: Opposition to gay measures based on law

Posted to: News Politics State Government Virginia

RICHMOND

Gov. Bob McDonnell on Monday said his opposition to two gay rights-related vestiges of former Gov. Timothy M. Kaine’s tenure are based on legal theory and aren’t a sign his administration is anti-gay .

One issue is a proposed regulatory change that would have allowed same-sex partners of state employees to share state health benefits. Kaine pushed that concept on his way out of office; McDonnell had it withdrawn from consideration last week.

The other is McDonnell’s failure to issue a non-discrimination order as several previous governors did. On Monday, McDonnell said that Kaine’s executive order on the subject remains in place, save the “sexual orientation” passage he objects to.

He and Kaine jousted on the topic four years ago when McDonnell was attorney general – McDonnell argues that such employment policies are the province of the legislature, not the governor.

And he told reporters Monday his policy will remain what it was when he was the state’s top prosecutor – discrimination won’t be tolerated in the state work force.

“The only thing I care about is will they work hard, will they follow the vision that I’ve outlined for state government, will they have a servant’s heart, do they love Virginia and will they get results,” he said.

Claire Guthrie Gastanaga, of the gay rights group Equality Virginia, argues that Virginia needs anti-discrimination legislation, not just public statements from the governor.

Chris Freund of the socially conservative Family Foundation disagrees.

Codifying the policy is an unnecessary step because “there’s been no evidence about discrimination in the workplace,” he said.

McDonnell hasn’t said whether he would sign into law that kind of bill.

The unapologetically conservative McDonnell faced tough questions about his views during last year’s campaign when his 1989 graduate thesis that contained writings about the harmful social impact  of homosexuals became public.

The governor later said his views had changed in the 20 years since he wrote the paper.

And while the election is over, the subject of gay rights remains a political fault line that is likely to continue to inspire questions about administration policies and critiques from foes.

“People in the  commonwealth want individuals to be judged on performance rendered on the job, not their personal lifestyles,” said House Minority Leader Ward Armstrong, D-Henry.

Julian Walker, (804) 697-1564, julian.walker@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Let's get involved!

"Chris Freund of the socially conservative Family Foundation disagrees. Codifying the policy is an unnecessary step because “there’s been no evidence about discrimination in the workplace,” he said."
WHAT!!!??? So. Since there is no "evidence about discrimination", we shouldn't legally protect the LGBT community? Seriously. I don't care what kind of problem one has with gay sex or religion. It's WRONG to discriminate in the workplace. Period. Here's the website for Equality Virginia:
http://www.equalityvirginia.org/

Let's make sure that all of our family members and loved ones have equal opportunities in the workplace!

1. Some people are not able

1. Some people are not able to buy their own insurance for a number of reasons: Medical, prior medical, financial reasons...so don't be so short sighted with your ignorant statements. I am myself unable to get insurance because of my family history of colon cancer. Also, I had a stroke and unable to work full time to get insurance. So yes...I get insurance through my husband.

2. There are many churches locally that would perform the ceremonies if they were legally allowed to.

3. How could a lot of things be beneficial through anyone's offspring. Addiction, Alcoholism. ect...so those people shouldn't have babies either?!

couple things drunken sailor

There are churches that would marry gays if it was legal in that state. Homosexuals have children by the same means as heterosexuals if they cannot carry them theirselves. No serious scientific help required.
You and others keep wanting to throw the Bible in you discusion, but your Bible has nothing to do with it, because as a "whole" you don't follow all the Bible tells you to.
One more thing, you can only define normal in what's normal for you, you cannot define normal for everyone else.
In my book hate is normal for some!

the cost of health care for STDs

AIDS is an expensive STD to treat, driving up the cost of health care for everyone in the system. Think about it!

So then african american's

So then african american's shouldn't be allowed anything either then because they have a high number of HIV infection rates. :-)

Your Stupid comment

The above comment was by obviously made by a narrow-minded homophobe ...

Think about it. Anyone seeking treatment for "any disease" will be given treatment ... even if they have no insurance or ability to pay, which is the case for HIV, as it is too expensive for anyone to afford out-of-pocket.

Thusly, the expense for those getting treatment is passed along to everyone else ... So, you are already helping to pay, either by higher insurance premiums or by higher charges/fees from the hospitals and doctors.

HOMOPHOBE

PLEASE,Name calling..

I agree.

The guys likely isn't a homophobe. He's just ignorant.

enough already

Last week it was don't ask don't tell,yesterday it was insurance,now they want to get married.Gay men need to understand that most hetro males not only disagree,but are repulsed at the idea of men having sex with each other.The more noise they make, the more hate they are creating.Imagine if a superstar football or baseball player came out of their closet,guess what,they wouldn't be able to get a job.What does that tell you..The majority won't stand for it..Plain and simple.

NFL

Read "The David Kopay Story". Or just google "David Kopay" We have already survived an NFL football player coming out. My guess is that if you asked him if he is gay, he would probably look at you and ask "You gotta problem with that?"

Coming out is easier and easier all the time. Younger people don't have a problem with it. The trouble is with bigoted people with insecurity problems looking for the next minority to hassle. Closeted gay politicians are usually the worst kind of people. I have to tell you I have my suspicions concerning both Governor McDonnell and Ken Cuccinelli. You've heard the term "it takes one to know one, well, I AM one and I am waiting for someone to spot them "out" somewhere, a la Larry Craig(R), Mark Foley(R), this recent politician in Bakersfield, CA, who got a DUI and was at a gay bar. Heard that line "me thinketh he protesteth too much?" You said "most heterosexual males..." Are you spending alot of time on this issue, asking heterosexuals about their opinions on gay sex?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: News rss feed    State Government rss feed   


Toolbox


Partners

special features