Medicaid cuts to further pinch ailing providers

Posted to: Health News State Government Virginia

Local hospitals are bracing for a round of Medicaid spending cuts that executives say could be the worst in decades and lead to more cutbacks in their organizations.

Rising health care costs and a surge in the number of Medicaid patients have increased the state's obligation to the government health insurance program for the poor and disabled by $777.7 million over two years.

The state also must find $1.2 billion to replace stimulus money that the federal government provided last year to help Virginia cope with rising health care demands and declining state revenue. That funding stops at the end of this year.

Former Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's state budget proposal calls for freezing the rates Medicaid pays hospitals for inpatient services a second consecutive year and other cuts to the program.

But hospital officials say Medicaid reimbursement rates already are well below what it costs to provide services and that further reductions would strain their facilities.

Now, the General Assembly is trying to write a budget that probably will need to absorb a $1.9 billion shortfall in addition to Kaine's proposed reductions, and hospital executives worry that the cuts could go deeper.

Their representatives are making their case to legislators. Both houses are scheduled to reveal their budget plans later this month.

"Last year was bad, and this year is a far more Draconian suggestion," said Michael Corcoran, chief financial officer of Chesapeake Regional Medical Center. "It's kind of a slow death, and eventually you'll hit the breaking point."

Medicaid provides insurance for low-income families and the disabled with funding from the state budget and an equal federal match. Beyond federal minimums, states can dictate eligibility requirements, services that are covered and reimbursement rates.

At about $2.6 billion, Medicaid accounts for more than 15 percent of Virginia's annual general fund budget.

Spending on the program grew more than usual last year, as the number of people receiving Medicaid swelled by about 5 percent. Local hospitals also have seen an uptick in the percentage of Medicaid patients, as well as a rise in the number of uninsured patients.

The state's policy is to set Medicaid hospital reimbursement rates at 78 percent at least every three years and then adjust annually for inflation, according to Craig Markva, a spokesman for the Virginia Department of Medical Assistance Services, which administers the program. But the General Assembly can change that.

To control costs, Virginia and 38 other states have withheld increases or reduced reimbursement rates in recent years, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Last year, the state's hospitals received about 72 percent of their cost on Medicaid patients. That's because reimbursement rates were frozen last year and weren't fully adjusted for inflation the previous year.

The Virginia Hospital and Healthcare Association estimates that Medicaid reimbursement could drop to 50 percent by 2012 if the General Assembly cuts the budget 15 percent across the board to make up for the shortfall.

"It's the worst treatment, in terms of rates, that we have ever seen," said Laurens Sartoris, the association's president.

Local hospital executives say it could add up to the loss of millions of dollars, noting that any state cuts will be matched dollar-for-dollar by a reduction in federal funding.

Children's Hospital of The King's Daughters probably would suffer most in South Hampton Roads.

About half of the hospital's patients are covered by Medicaid, enough that the program pays CHKD additional "disproportionate share hospital" funds to offset the losses. About 36 percent of the hospital's revenue last year came from Medicaid - approximately $88 million, said Jim Dahling, its president and CEO.

Because Kaine's plan includes freezing the disproportionate share hospital money and eliminating special payments for facilities with high-volume neonatal intensive-care units, CHKD would lose on more than just reimbursement rates. Its estimated loss under that proposal: $9.1 million a year.

After cutting $6.5 million in expenses last year, including 137 jobs, CHKD may have to trim more positions and scale back the availability of some services, Dahling said.

"The fact of the matter is we don't have much to work with, and any cut to us is devastating to what we're trying to accomplish here," he said.

For other local hospitals, Medicaid makes up 6 to 9 percent of their revenue. The Medicaid cuts come as privately insured patients delay procedures or other services to save money, forcing the organizations to make reductions.

Bon Secours Hampton Roads Health System sustained a $12 million loss in the budget year ending last summer and eliminated 200 positions through attrition and layoffs between fall 2008 and last spring.

Bon Secours, which received $35.6 million from Medicaid last year, stands to lose up to $7.2 million a year by 2012 if Kaine's plan is followed, said chief financial officer Greg Simia.

"You can sustain one year of these kinds of unfortunate trends, but doubled-up, back-to-back, I think that makes it more serious," Simia said.

Under Kaine's budget, Chesapeake General Hospital faces losing $7.6 million over two years from potential Medicaid cuts, Corcoran estimated. Sentara Healthcare's seven Hampton Roads hospitals could see a $20 million decrease next year, said Vicky Gray, a company senior vice president.

To absorb losses, providers likely will raise what they charge private insurance companies, said Sartoris, the president of the state hospital association.

"What we're being forced to do, to a greater extent than ever before, is to become a tax collector for the state," he said.

While some local executives said they wanted to be paid "fairly" or "at an appropriate level" by Medicaid, others were more concrete about their hopes.

CHKD's Dahling wants hospitals with a large number of Medicaid patients to be exempt from reductions in disproportionate share hospital funds and from the elimination of payments for high-volume neonatal intensive-care units.

Given the dire economic situation, Gray said most health care providers will have to accept some cuts. She said Kaine's proposal would be palatable.

 

Amy Jeter, (757) 446-2730, amy.jeter@pilotonline.com

COMMENTS ADVISORY: Users are solely responsible for opinions they post here; comments do not reflect the views of The Virginian-Pilot or its websites. Users must follow agreed-upon rules: Be civil, be clean, be on topic; don't attack private individuals, other users or classes of people. Read the full rules here.
- Comments are automatically checked for inappropriate language, but readers might find some comments offensive or inaccurate. If you believe a comment violates our rules, click the report violation link below it.

Change begins at the bottom up not the top down.

There's an old saying in Tennessee — I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee — that says, fool me once, shame on — [pauses] - shame on you. Fool me — You can't get fooled again. President W.

Thanks W for two senseless wars, tax cuts for the rich, deregulation and this fine recession. I guess you can get fooled again because the American people were fooled into electing you twice. If they only knew what was coming.

And for those of you who want change. Look in the mirror and start taking action because change begins with you. You have to bring the change to the government and force them to make it happen. At least with Obama, if you bring the change he will sign it into law. If you wait to long, a Republican will eventually be back in office per the political cycle and then even if you act, you will be put back in your place by the corporate wealth oligarchy.

this is the same medicaid

that the Bozobama plan would have 60% of moved into, forget what he said about keeping your insurance, he lied, just like he always does about everything

Oh and one man's greedy corporation is a is another man's greedy development company.

Health Care Reform

I especially like the part about "To absorb losses, providers likely will raise what they charge private insurance companies". Wonder how that's going to impact my health insurance premiums? Thanks Republicans, at least you managed to keep one part of the economy growing, unfortunately it came at the expense of the insured. Shifting cost for medical services like this should be illegal.

Medicaid cuts

Whoever suggested that health-care providers would offset revenue losses from Medicaid cuts by increasing their fees to everyone else doesn't know anything about health care economics. You can charge anything you want but insurance companies set rates. There are only limited ways to deal with cuts: refuse to see Medicaid patients (not practical for hospitals); see them more often than necessary to make up fractional losses with increased volume; or create a medical record that suggests you did more than you really did to increase reimbursement (likely a felony), or get together with providers of similar specialty and try to set rates by collusion, also known as jawboning (also likely a felony). As a provider I may be forced to the first solution even though I feel fortunate to do what I do and like to think that seeing Medicaid patients is my way of giving back to society for my good fortune. One cannot sustain massive losses, however, and survive.

That's absolute horse squeeze Mike.

The Executive Branch (Barack Obama - DEMOCRAT) The House of Representatives (MAJORITY DEMOCRATS), and The US SENATE (MAJORITY DEMOCRAT who had 60 votes until a few weeks ago) are running the show now. You complain we spending money prosecuting two wars, and building bridges to no where. SO What has happened to "the change we can believe in"? Huh? I didn't hear you. BO has the POWER to pull those troops out tomorrow if he wanted to. The democrats are doing the same thing they and you accuse the reublicans of. The House and Senate have agreed to increase the debt spending to 1.9 TRILLION. And you still enspouse this pinko commie progressive tax system. Rubbish. The problems of government having enough money will NEVER go away. You live a fantasy Mike. Your dems are in charge now Mikey and they are still propping up Wall Street. The country's debt is screwed up like it is because both parties want it that way.

And although they control both houses and the presidency.

They have to fight the obstructionist party of no every single step of the way.
One Republican moron Senator from Alabama has held up 80 appointments, for no other reason than playing political games. That is really putting the best interests of the nation first huhn, leaving important positions unfilled?
Senator Dimwit has held up the appointment of the head of the TSA and left our nation without a head in an important Security Department because he is worried about the workers getting collective bargaining rights (something all other depts. already have). Way to put the nation first.
The Republican party has no ideas. All they can do is say no to just about everything because they are beholden to the bankers and corporations and they oppose any legislation or appointments which will cut into profits and bonuses. And some of the DINOs are not much better than their bethren Republican ilk.

I am all for more voices.

As long as they're not speaking through a corporate bought bull horn.

And you call yourself open

And you call yourself open minded? I seem to recall that the grand dragon of the KKK Senator Robert C. Byrd DEMOCRAT West Virginia held the talked about 30 hours about nothing in order to fillibuster something HE didn't agree with. So don't 'just' blame the republicans. Both parties do things to their advantage when the other is in power. I agree with you that the republicans don't stand for nothing anymore. I'll give you this about the dems though. They will kiss you AFTER they have taken everything from you. This is why there needs to be MORE voices.

Civil Society

I guess those who fail to acknowledge that over the last two generations, those in the middle class who work for a living have seen their incomes go up very little, while the top 2% of Americans have reaped gains of 20 to 30 times, mainly due to the tax policies of the republican administrations for whom supply side economics always seem to benefit the wall street types. So even those who have benefitted who point out that we need to address the disparity in incomes are subject to derision and criticism. Point is, if you agree to restore the progressive tax rates of the past, suddenly the aforementioned problems basically go away. Is that too much to pay to restore civil society?

oh and I'm sure

that you didn't put away the maximum allowable contribution to your 401(k) and I'm sure you didn't take any tax differed employer match or profit sharing contribution. Surely you took all this money as income and paid taxes. Surely you didn't tax shelter tens of thousands a year since the changes in ETGRA allowed the highly compensated (you know rich developers) to sock away upwards of 50,000 a year. Surely you paid taxes on this so you wouldn't be perpetuating a cycle of pandering to the rich.

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Please note: Threaded comments work best if you view the oldest comments first.

More articles from: Health rss feed    News rss feed    State Government rss feed   



Toolbox


Partners

Find a HEALTH CARE PROVIDER

Doctor or facility name, keyword: i.e., optometrist, dental, home health care
City, State or Zip: i.e., Norfolk, VA or 23510
 

special features